Venture-Agent, Ohio—Columbus
|
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
So now that we have reporting open I got to sit and report sheets that have been waiting and I came across something that it seems a point to make.
Why is the Organized Play # box this small? Most of my players and many without crazy large handwriting, are not fitting their number into this box making is a lot harder for reporters to read what we are typing in.
The longest and newest sets of numbers from our lodge for a 2e character is 11 in length, not counting the dash (12 with the dash).
The longest class name after the playtest will be Investigator at 12 - the current is 9 at Barbarian -- and these can be abbreviated and currently not needed for reporting.
Proposal: Switch the Class and Org Play # Boxes.
|
I also wish that the sheets in the scenarios had the scenario name hard coded (as was done in PF1). It was one of the reasons that I printed out the scenario sheet as opposed to just using a generic sign up sheet (one less thing to get wrong, one less place where I have to figure out my handwriting days or weeks later)
|
Venture-Agent, Ohio—Columbus
|
I like the one that is on pfsprep - my only issue is most of the people who run here just hit "print all" on the pages and use the one out of the back of the scenario.
Thus hopefully asking the great, powerful, gracious, obliging, and amiable one's we might help GM, lodge, reporters, and players everywhere.
|
Ditto. I just reported my first PFS2 event. I emphasized to all the players that it was important to their rewards to legibly fill out the reporting sheet, only to realize it was nearly impossible to put in most players' character number in a legible manner. Come on guys! This is the most important field for reporting and there isn't enough room on the form for it?
For God's sake, the Org Play # spot is way too small. Paizo, please fix this. It seems to me that particular space is the most important spot for PCs to log on the reporting sheet.