
shroudb |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
i disagree.
a melee thrown weapon is still a melee weapon.
as per the weapon traits, they specifically exist ranged thrown weapons and melee thrown weapons.
ofc, again per the traits, if you thow the weapon it is a ranged strike.
but if the only thing that a feat asks is "strike with a melee weapon" then you can use a melee thrown weapon to strike (regardless if it's a melee strike or a ranged strike) with said feat.
If the feat specified a melee strike, then no, you couldn't use melee thrown weapons, because when you use the Throw trait, the strike becomes a ranged attack.
Twin takedown as an example:
it requires two melee weapon in hand.
those can easily be 2 melee trown weapons.
it requires you to strike with them.
again, not a melee strike, but a strike. That can easily be a thrown strike.
you could do that then with something like thrown axes, but not with darts/javelins

Stregi |
i disagree.
a melee thrown weapon is still a melee weapon.
as per the weapon traits, they specifically exist ranged thrown weapons and melee thrown weapons.
ofc, again per the traits, if you thow the weapon it is a ranged strike.
but if the only thing that a feat asks is "strike with a melee weapon" then you can use a melee thrown weapon to strike (regardless if it's a melee strike or a ranged strike) with said feat.
If the feat specified a melee strike, then no, you couldn't use melee thrown weapons, because when you use the Throw trait, the strike becomes a ranged attack.
Twin takedown as an example:
it requires two melee weapon in hand.
those can easily be 2 melee trown weapons.
it requires you to strike with them.
again, not a melee strike, but a strike. That can easily be a thrown strike.
you could do that then with something like thrown axes, but not with darts/javelins
I agree with your point of view, I'll try a to build something around it and see if it feels too wrong