Presentation Survey

[Strachan Fireblade]

I thought it was worth mentioning that I thought this was a very solid survey. It seemed to have the right balance/types of questions for the feedback I wanted to give. Kudos to the designer of this survey!

[FitzTheRuke]

Yeah, this one was good and very important. I think that the Playtest document was pretty poorly presented. I've always assumed that they would do a much, much better job for the final product, but I admit that *I* don't know what would make it better, I just know that I don't like it the way it is.

[Marc Radle]

I was very happy to see a number of questions specifically aimed at if the icons should stay or go in the final book ...

[Vic Ferrari]

Marc Radle wrote:

I was very happy to see a number of questions specifically aimed at if the icons should stay or go in the final book ...

Me too. That has been a big one for me, aside from being vision impaired and all that, I find them aesthetically unappealing and cheap. Hard to differentiate between the 2 and 3 action symbol at a glance. I entered I would prefer something like:

2 Actions
Actions (2)

Anything, but icons/symbols. The Reaction symbol looks like a men's lavatory sign, to me.

I also don't like the light puke-green bubble-box for monster traits.

The entire thing comes across as a dry, dense, technical read. it also seems like it was a Sci-Fi RPG, converted to the Fantasy milieu.

[Marc Radle]

Agreed!
Let’s hope the survey data bares this out ...