| LegendOfDragoon |
Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber
Dragonborn3 wrote:
Dude, it's a playtest. The entirety of the previous edition is not in it. Wait until the final book is out, okay?
That's a double edged sword. It's a playtest so they need feedback both on a mechanical level and an option level. I'm putting the desire out there as feedback.
| MerlinCross |
Alchemaic wrote:
Not only does SNA not function in the same way it did before, but the Alchemist is a completely different class than the PF1e version and lacks spells. A Preservationist can't happen as-is.
No but I for one wouldn't mind seeing some kind of Ooze based Alchemist early.
But if it's crafting based that's going to really stink.
| Alchemaic |
Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
MerlinCross wrote:
Alchemaic wrote:Not only does SNA not function in the same way it did before, but the Alchemist is a completely different class than the PF1e version and lacks spells. A Preservationist can't happen as-is.No but I for one wouldn't mind seeing some kind of Ooze based Alchemist early.
But if it's crafting based that's going to really stink.
See, that I could see happening at least. Oozecrafting was a thing, and there was also the option of turning yourself into Ooze in a few different ways with mutagens. Plus there was the Petrified Ooze alchemical item.