| Luca Bancone |
Luca Bancone wrote:I have found nothing about it in the manual, can't you use it anymore?With the new action economy there's not a real need for specific Two-Weapon Fighting Rules. However, there's Fighter/Ranger Feats for enhancing Two-Weapon Fighting.
I don't know, with "double slice" it seems the only difference is your second strike use the same penality of the first one, then the third counts as third.
that means your attacks are 0, 0, -10, instead of 0, -5, -10
it doesn't give to you an extra attack anymore and that was the peculiarity of the two weapon fighting styile.
| TheFinish |
TheFinish wrote:Luca Bancone wrote:I have found nothing about it in the manual, can't you use it anymore?With the new action economy there's not a real need for specific Two-Weapon Fighting Rules. However, there's Fighter/Ranger Feats for enhancing Two-Weapon Fighting.I don't know, with "double slice" it seems the only difference is your second strike use the same penality of the first one, then the third counts as third.
that means your attacks are 0, 0, -10, instead of 0, -5, -10
it doesn't give to you an extra attack anymore and that was the peculiarity of the two weapon fighting styile.
Well, it combines the damage, which is good for beating Resistances (though bad for taking advantage of Weaknesses.). Still, having two attacks at your highest bonus is an advantage, and a definite one.
Fighters and Rangers also both get Twin Parry, Twin Riposte. Fighters can also get Improved Twin Riposte, Two Weapon Flurry and Twin Paragon. All of those work with and enhance the use of two weapons. That's what I meant by saying those classes get feats for enhancing Two-Weapon Fighting.
| Zman0 |
It is specific to Fighter and Ranger class feats. It is pretty good actually, basically you get to make a second attack at a greatly reduced penalty.
What surprises me is that Rogues do not currently have access to it without spending two feats to multiclass into Fighter. So, a Rogue can get it at level 4. I suspect this was intentional for balance issue, but still, this one doesn't sit right.