Sisterhood Style and teamwork feat prerequisites


Rules Questions


1 person marked this as FAQ candidate.

I have a build that probably won't come online until a late level, but I'd still like to build around the Coordinated Charge and Sisterhood Style feats, both for their flavor and mechanical advantages.

Can you grant an ally Coordinated Charge if they don't meet the prerequisites (having two other teamwork feats, BAB +10)? Certain "grant feats to an ally" abilities explicitly say they do not need to meet the prerequisites, but Sisterhood Style does not, just says:

Sisterhood Style:
when you enter the Sisterhood Style stance, you can choose a teamwork feat you have. As a swift action, you can grant that feat to an ally within 10 feet until the beginning of your next turn.

Coordinated Charge is admittedly a powerful feat, but so is the feat chain to get and grant it. I want to say it's legal, but then I've read PFS rulings that say you can't grant allies Amplified Rage, for example, because they don't meet the half-orc prerequisite. Presumably, Coordinated Charge + Sisterhood Style would be sunk under that same ruling, assuming the allies don't also have two teamwork feats and BAB 10.

Any advice is appreciated.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

The intention, when writing Sisterhood Style, was that the targets would not need to meet the prerequisites.

As always, this isn't an official ruling, as I lack the authority to make such rulings. Merely an author's statement of intent. ^_^


It actually does work, even though it's a pretty weird case: First, granting the entire feat includes the prereqs. But, the relevant rule says "A character can’t use a feat if he loses a prerequisite, but he does not lose the feat itself." (CRB pg. 112) Since the target never had the prereqs, they can't lose them.

@Isabelle: It would have been better to either say "As a swift action, you can grant the benefits of that feat to an ally within 10 feet until the beginning of your next turn.", or explicitly say prereqs are ignored.


Granting the benefits of a teamwork feat may not be a great thing as it creates a grey area of if they actually have it for the purposes of others using it too, like boosting saves of adjacent allies with the feat, for example.


Oh, yeah, you're right. I didn't think about that, sorry.


Despite the author's intent, I would say that based on the wording of the tactician ability from the Cavalier (the original teamwork feat sharing ability) that you would need an explicit statement of not needing to meet the prereqs built in to the ability. At least from a a strict "Rules as Written" perspective. So lacking it would mean those granted the feat would need to meet the prereqs to make use of it.


Claxon wrote:
At least from a a strict "Rules as Written" perspective. So lacking it would mean those granted the feat would need to meet the prereqs to make use of it.

Due to which rule?


There are plenty of classes and/or archetypes which give bonus feats without explicitly stating that you need to meet the prereqs.


Derklord wrote:
Claxon wrote:
At least from a a strict "Rules as Written" perspective. So lacking it would mean those granted the feat would need to meet the prereqs to make use of it.
Due to which rule?
CRB, Feats wrote:

Prerequisites

Some feats have prerequisites. Your character must have the indicated ability score, class feature, feat, skill, base attack bonus, or other quality designated in order to select or use that feat. A character can gain a feat at the same level at which he gains the prerequisite.

A character can't use a feat if he loses a prerequisite, but he does not lose the feat itself. If, at a later time, he regains the lost prerequisite, he immediately regains full use of the feat that prerequisite enables.

If you don't have the prereq, you can't use the feat, absent a special ability overriding this.


Feats general require you to meet their prerequisites for use.

If you don't meet their prerequisites, you can't use them.

Even if you grant the feat to your allies, if you don't allow them ignore the prereqs they would still need to meet them. The ability in question doesn't specify that they can ignore prereqs.

Quote:

Prerequisites

Some feats have prerequisites. Your character must have the indicated ability score, class feature, feat, skill, base attack bonus, or other quality designated in order to select or use that feat. A character can gain a feat at the same level at which he gains the prerequisite.


Kristal Moonhand wrote:
There are plenty of classes and/or archetypes which give bonus feats without explicitly stating that you need to meet the prereqs.

They don't need to since the general rules tell you that you must.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

First, thank you, Isabella, for the awesome work you’ve done. I’m a big fan of the classes/archetype/feats you’ve created. I appreciate your perspective on authorial intent.

Fuzzy-Wuzzy wrote:
If you don't have the prereq, you can't use the feat, absent a special ability overriding this.

I agree with the consensus view that prerequisites apply unless explicitly stated by the ability. I could’ve sworn I found another class or archetype that allowed you to share feats but did not specify that allies did not need to meet the prerequisites, but now I can’t seem to find any. Am I missing something?

If Sisterhood Style is the anomaly, I think that it deserves an errata for consistency, if nothing else. The feats themselves lose a lot of their punch since most teamwork feats carry prerequisites. I could see an argument that the style is meant to be taken by the Gray Maidens alone, therefore they all share similar training, but then why bother sharing feats at all? Besides, Isabella has already said the intent was to ignore prerequisites.

Had I been able to find another example of an ability that shared feats but not granted the ability to bypass prereqs, I would have suggested breaking those two abilities into distinct features that are granted at different levels. For example, you can share any teamwork feats you know at a lower level, but only after a certain, higher level could you share feats with prerequisites and allow the allies to ignore those prerequisites.


Claxon wrote:
Kristal Moonhand wrote:
There are plenty of classes and/or archetypes which give bonus feats without explicitly stating that you need to meet the prereqs.
They don't need to since the general rules tell you that you must.

So I guess the True Silvered Throne Shaman doesn't get Ritual Hex since that's a 1st level ability for them and Ritual Hex requires 4 ranks in both Arcana and History? Warpriests don't get Weapon Focus since that requires +1 BAB and they have +0 BAB at 1st level.


Kristal Moonhand wrote:
Claxon wrote:
Kristal Moonhand wrote:
There are plenty of classes and/or archetypes which give bonus feats without explicitly stating that you need to meet the prereqs.
They don't need to since the general rules tell you that you must.
So I guess the True Silvered Throne Shaman doesn't get Ritual Hex since that's a 1st level ability for them and Ritual Hex requires 4 ranks in both Arcana and History? Warpriests don't get Weapon Focus since that requires +1 BAB and they have +0 BAB at 1st level.

i don't think anyone said that. of course they get those feats. but since there's no text stating otherwise, according to the RAW, they can't use those feats until they meet the prerequisites.


Kristal Moonhand wrote:
Claxon wrote:
Kristal Moonhand wrote:
There are plenty of classes and/or archetypes which give bonus feats without explicitly stating that you need to meet the prereqs.
They don't need to since the general rules tell you that you must.
So I guess the True Silvered Throne Shaman doesn't get Ritual Hex since that's a 1st level ability for them and Ritual Hex requires 4 ranks in both Arcana and History? Warpriests don't get Weapon Focus since that requires +1 BAB and they have +0 BAB at 1st level.

It's not a question of "get," it's a question of "can use."

The Warpriest's Weapon Focus not falling under their Bonus Feats ability was an authorial screwup. I've heard this has been officially clarified, but I don't know where (so it might not be true).

Warpriest wrote:
Bonus Feats: At 3rd level and every 3 levels thereafter, a warpriest gains a bonus feat in addition to those gained from normal advancement. These bonus feats must be selected from those listed as combat feats. The warpriest must meet the prerequisites for these feats, but he treats his warpriest level as his base attack bonus (in addition to base attack bonuses gained from other classes and Hit Dice) for the purpose of qualifying for these feats. Finally, for the purposes of these feats, the warpriest can select feats that have a minimum number of fighter levels as a prerequisite, treating his warpriest level as his fighter level.
True Silvered Throne Shaman wrote:
Ritual Hex: A true silvered throne gains Ritual Hex (see page 24) as a bonus feat.

I imagine the TSTS author thought that "bonus feat" has been defined to mean "one that you don't need prereqs for." They were wrong. Mistakes happen even in hardcovers, and the TSTS is from a splatbook, hence less edited (and not going to get errata'd).


cuatroespada wrote:
Kristal Moonhand wrote:
Claxon wrote:
Kristal Moonhand wrote:
There are plenty of classes and/or archetypes which give bonus feats without explicitly stating that you need to meet the prereqs.
They don't need to since the general rules tell you that you must.
So I guess the True Silvered Throne Shaman doesn't get Ritual Hex since that's a 1st level ability for them and Ritual Hex requires 4 ranks in both Arcana and History? Warpriests don't get Weapon Focus since that requires +1 BAB and they have +0 BAB at 1st level.
i don't think anyone said that. of course they get those feats. but since there's no text stating otherwise, according to the RAW, they can't use those feats until they meet the prerequisites.

Exactly. In those cases they would have the feat, but be unable to use it (by strict rules). But much as Isabell has indicated here, that probably wasn't the intention.

So how it works depends on your GM and how they run things.

I'm not saying one interpretation is better than the other, just expressing that by the rules you wouldn't be able to use the feats, unless it was expressly mentioned you didn't need to meet the prereqs.


Fuzzy-Wuzzy wrote:
If you don't have the prereq, you can't use the feat, absent a special ability overriding this.

Ok, this is amberassing - I didn't see the "or use" part. My bad!


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Derklord wrote:
Fuzzy-Wuzzy wrote:
If you don't have the prereq, you can't use the feat, absent a special ability overriding this.
Ok, this is amberassing - I didn't see the "or use" part. My bad!

Hey, we're all human. We all make mistakes and miss things even when we're trying our best not to. Sometimes we fixate on one part of something and miss another. Nothing to be embarrassed about.


I blame the line break!

Well, can I at least be embarassed that apparently, I can't type "embarrassing"? ;-)

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Sisterhood Style and teamwork feat prerequisites All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Rules Questions