RSS Facebook Twitter Email
Community / Forums / Archive / Pathfinder / Playtests & Prerelease Discussions / Pathfinder Playtest / Pathfinder Playtest Prerelease Discussion

The unpopular opinion; Maybe Paladins shouldn't be a class

Prerelease Discussion

Search Thread

Search this Thread:

551 to 554 of 554 << first < prev | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | next > last >>
2 people marked this as a favorite.

Alright, please explain how we're removing the identity of the Paladin by opening it up, without resorting to "tradition" or "I feel that it does" for your arguement.

Right now the only reasons I've heard are those ones, and frankly it's getting weary.

Also explain why NG can't make a good paladin.
Arssanguinus wrote:


You are removing the identity of the paladin and re0acing it with something more generic.

I can't speak to all approaches, but Paladins as a branch of a larger class does nothing to harm the Paladin's identity.

Becoming a Paladin, being a Paladin, etc remain exactly the same as they would have otherwise.
Lantern Lodge Customer Service Manager
6 people marked this as a favorite.

Locked.
551 to 554 of 554 << first < prev | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Archive / Pathfinder / Playtests & Prerelease Discussions / Pathfinder Playtest / Pathfinder Playtest Prerelease Discussion / The unpopular opinion; Maybe Paladins shouldn't be a class All Messageboards
Recent threads in Pathfinder Playtest Prerelease Discussion