| Balkoth |
"You can move 5 feet in any round when you don’t perform any other kind of movement. Taking this 5-foot step never provokes an attack of opportunity. You can’t take more than one 5-foot step in a round, and you can’t take a 5-foot step in the same round that you move any distance."
Say you're next to an enemy and decide to normally move away. Unfortunately, this provokes an AoO and the enemy trips you, so you fall prone in your starting square. You stand up as another move action (two move actions used so far).
At this point, which is true?
1, you can 5 foot step still because you didn't actually move any distance and the rule is "you can’t take a 5-foot step in the same round that you move any distance"
or
2, you cannot 5 foot step because you performed a move action on failed movement and the rule is "You can move 5 feet in any round when you don’t perform any other kind of movement"
Diego Rossi
|
Standing up is a "kind of movement", so you can't 5-foot step.
Standing up is a move action, but not movement.
@Balkoth
Take 5-Foot StepYou can move 5 feet in any round when you don't perform any other kind of movement.
Moving: Moving out of a threatened square usually provokes attacks of opportunity from threatening opponents. There are two common methods of avoiding such an attack—the 5-foot step and the withdraw action.
The attack of opportunity happen when you are leaving the square, so you have moved. Maybe only half a step, but you have started your movement.
| Balkoth |
The attack of opportunity happen when you are leaving the square, so you have moved. Maybe only half a step, but you have started your movement.
I suspect someone arguing #1 (like Melkiador) would claim that if you get tripped before leaving your square (and thus fall prone in your square) then you haven't effectively moved.
So that's effectively 1 vote for #1 (Melkiador) and one vote for #2 (Diego).
I agree that standing up from prone doesn't preclude a 5 foot step.