| toastedamphibian |
Nefreet
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Tacticslion wrote:Dot!?
It means that Tacticslion is marking this thread so that they can better find and follow up with it at a later date, perhaps after more opinions have been added, or so that they can create a more in-depth post themselves after some research.
Often this is done by leaving a sole period (a "."), but as with any behavior on the internet it can evolve over time (. => . => • => dot => dottage => etc).
| Unassuming Local Guy |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
If your GM is allowing 3.5 items in their Pathfinder game (Celestial Plate is not a Pathfinder item) then it should work, pending their approval.
It claims its from a PF module Skeletons of Scarwall.
Not saying you are wrong, I'm curious as to what I'm reading, its quite possible I'm mistaken and I could learn something from this. Is it not a "PF legal" module or something? (I'm not goung to even ask if its PFS legal)
| Lost In Limbo |
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Nefreet wrote:If your GM is allowing 3.5 items in their Pathfinder game (Celestial Plate is not a Pathfinder item) then it should work, pending their approval.It claims its from a PF module Skeletons of Scarwall.
Not saying you are wrong, I'm curious as to what I'm reading, its quite possible I'm mistaken and I could learn something from this. Is it not a "PF legal" module or something? (I'm not goung to even ask if its PFS legal)
Skeletons of Scarwall is a very old module, from back when Pathfinder was just a campaign setting and not a separate game system from 3.5.
| Unassuming Local Guy |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Unassuming Local Guy wrote:Skeletons of Scarwall is a very old module, from back when Pathfinder was just a campaign setting and not a separate game system from 3.5.Nefreet wrote:If your GM is allowing 3.5 items in their Pathfinder game (Celestial Plate is not a Pathfinder item) then it should work, pending their approval.It claims its from a PF module Skeletons of Scarwall.
Not saying you are wrong, I'm curious as to what I'm reading, its quite possible I'm mistaken and I could learn something from this. Is it not a "PF legal" module or something? (I'm not goung to even ask if its PFS legal)
Thank you, that makes so much sense and is very helpful
| Cevah |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Possible? Heretical? What armor proficiency is needed? What bonus does it provide to Bulette Rampage? What are it's stats?
Seems like it would work. +10 AC before enhancement bonus, +4 max dex, -3ACP, 45lbs, Heavy Armor. Right?
Don't forget:
Drawback
Double-plated armor’s armor category (light, medium, or heavy) is considered to be one heavier. Heavy armor that has the modification added to it is too restrictive to use without the Armor Adept (double-plated) feat (see page 11).
Full Plate is heavy, so you need a feat to use double plated full plate.
/cevah
| Coidzor |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Possible? Heretical? What armor proficiency is needed? What bonus does it provide to Bulette Rampage? What are it's stats?
Seems like it would work. +10 AC before enhancement bonus, +4 max dex, -3ACP, 45lbs, Heavy Armor. Right?
Depends on if your GM allows a suit of armor to be made in the distinctive Gray Maiden style of armor as well as the Celestial armor style and manufacture. As that is a GM call as far as I can tell.
As is whether to allow Celestial Plate as well, though I don't see any compelling reason to disallow Celestial Plate existing.
| Tacticslion |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
toastedamphibian wrote:Tacticslion wrote:Dot!?It means that Tacticslion is marking this thread so that they can better find and follow up with it at a later date, perhaps after more opinions have been added, or so that they can create a more in-depth post themselves after some research.
Often this is done by leaving a sole period (a "."), but as with any behavior on the internet it can evolve over time (. => . => • => dot => dottage => etc).
Yep!