7-19 Labyrinth Of Hungry Ghosts


GM Discussion

1 to 50 of 96 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
3/5

Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber

Starting my prep of this scenario, and starting this thread to ask questions etc. First up...

Encounter B1

Spoiler:

Low Tier says - "The wight does attack Ilzinian—it knows that Tzur Vaal is possessing him. "

High Tier Says - "The wights do not attack Ilzinian—they know that Tzur Vaal is possessing him."

I assume both should have been "not attack", correct?

A bit confused about the interaction of the unique mist monster and the undead. The tactics say "It is aware of the advantages it has when fighting inside the hungry mist and does its best to remain within it". Since the mist is doing negative energy, I assume the tactic was meant to heal the wights with it's Enveloping Mists ability? Do they take the staggered condition that ability also imposes?

Encounter B2

Spoiler:

The hazard section of this in some parts refers to "stonework", "marble" and in others places "walls". If a PC is barefoot... Does this hazard apply to them walking normally w/o touching a wall?

The hazard mentions only PCs, but if they have companions/summons/etc does this hazard apply to them as well?

Grand Lodge 4/5 **** Developer

Encounter B1:

Low tier should also say "does not attack".
The wights are immune to taking damage from negative energy, so they are not staggered by enveloping mists.

Encounter B2:
Companions, summons, and other creatures are also affected. The hazard applies to touching walls only rather than walking barefoot—otherwise, animal companions would be in for quite a rough journey.

Sovereign Court 4/5 5/5 ***

Pathfinder Starfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Looking over to prep this - the boons are _really_ nice. They're not powerful, but they're really flavorful and appropriate. I like it!

Shadow Lodge 5/5

Just read through. Interesting premise. Some questions though to others prepping.

First question is on Encounter B1

Encounter B1:
Just for my own making sure I got this. The high-tier Hungry Fog stat block does not appear anywhere in the scenario, correct? The block says "see page 11", but page 11 has the variant hungry mist. I can't find Hungry Fog in the appendix.

A little confused on the last encounter in B5. Maybe it's implied but I can't find it implicitly stated.

B5:
Assuming that the group does not identify Tzur-Vaal, do they get to fight possessed Jaohd, and once he is killed, the incorporeal version will appear that they have to fight as well. If this is correct, and Jaohd is instead knocked unconscious, should I assume that the spirit will dismiss the possession spell-like effect (which is listed as a duration with a (D)) and leave the body?

Alternatively, is it that you either fight the possessed Jaohd, or the incorporeal undead that possesses him?

I can make up lots of tactics for this encounter, but I'm wondering what the intent was.

Contributor, RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, 2011 Top 32, 2012 Top 4

MisterSlanky wrote:

First question is on Encounter B1

** spoiler omitted **

I haven't seen the final PDF, so I can't answer this one.

MisterSlanky wrote:

A little confused on the last encounter in B5. Maybe it's implied but I can't find it implicitly stated.

** spoiler omitted **

I'll answer this using a spoiler tag ...

B5 response:
If the PCs do not unmask Jaohd/Tzur-Vaal and dispel the possession effect, they will indeed have to fight the possessed Jaohd. If Jaohd is killed, rendered unconscious, or even just rendered helpless for more than two or three rounds while his beloved Aluu-Nekva is threatened, I'd expect Tzur-Vaal would dismiss the possession effect and emerge to attack the PCs in his ghostly form since he'd be desperate to protect his mate (even though she wants to eat him while he "wears" Jaohd).

Hope that helps!

Shadow Lodge 5/5

Tom Phillips wrote:
MisterSlanky wrote:

A little confused on the last encounter in B5. Maybe it's implied but I can't find it implicitly stated.

** spoiler omitted **

I'll answer this using a spoiler tag ...

** spoiler omitted **

Hope that helps!

That answers the question implicitly. As I said. I could make up tactics until I the cows came home, but it's PFS so I wanted to measure intent. Yours follows what I was thinking, so cool.

Grand Lodge 4/5 **** Developer

MisterSlanky wrote:

Just read through. Interesting premise. Some questions though to others prepping.

First question is on Encounter B1

** spoiler omitted **

A little confused on the last encounter in B5. Maybe it's implied but I can't find it implicitly stated.

** spoiler omitted **

Encounter B1:
That reference is in error. The high subtier should use the standard hungry fog monster from Bestiary 3, which is missing from the appendix.

For B5, basically, what Tom said.

Dark Archive 4/5 5/5 ****

Had a lot of fun playing this one with MisterSlanky GMing. Was a real challenge for a Lust (enchantments) specialist, but was able to tweak my spell selection to give more options. Love that durations matter on buff spells.

The possession was interesting, too... Was not a shock with "Jhoad" attacked me... But it was one when the ghost flew out of his body after I used Hold Person on him! Guess it was a good thing that I had used up a large portion of my spells by this time (and missed the concentration check on Glitterdust her. I could "sparkle-bomb four PCs).

Great challenge, and one where many different types of characters will shine!

Shadow Lodge 4/5 5/55/55/55/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—San Francisco Bay Area North & East

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Reading through... it seams like Rogues will not be shining. Most of the things in here can't be sneak attacked. Also, most things are incorporeal (as can be expected from the title). Most people will have magic weapons by high tier, but ghostbane is a bit of a niche case.

You start off at the Spires, so the party doesn't have a chance to go shopping to get stuff after the briefing. While this is nice narratively, it'd be nice if you were told in Drenchport (or whereever Benarry picks you up) "Hey, you're going to a place called the Labyrinth of Hungry Ghosts - you might want to grab some stuff for dealing with ghosts."

Another option: A previous scenario with Benarry (Fate of the Fiend) included this line: "If the PCs need to purchase any gear, the Grinning Pixie’s quartermaster can sell them nearly any mundane or alchemical gear in addition to magic items worth 2,500 gp or less." Should that be in effect here as well?

Sovereign Court 4/5 5/5 ***

Pathfinder Starfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
James Anderson wrote:
Another option: A previous scenario with Benarry (Fate of the Fiend) included this line: "If the PCs need to purchase any gear, the Grinning Pixie’s quartermaster can sell them nearly any mundane or alchemical gear in addition to magic items worth 2,500 gp or less." Should that be in effect here as well?

It's on the bottom right-hand corner of page 5

The Exchange 4/5 5/5

James Anderson wrote:
Reading through... it seams like Rogues will not be shining. Most of the things in here can't be sneak attacked. Also, most things are incorporeal (as can be expected from the title). Most people will have magic weapons by high tier, but ghostbane is a bit of a niche case.

Depending on the tier, number of players, and the party's actions they may only have to fight two incorporeal creatures.

I ran this for a low-tier party of four including two rogues. Very few chances to sneak attack, but they weren't really necessary. Each rogue was carrying one of the pouches of Grave Salt and that was actually the star of the show in the final fight. They decided to fight Tzur-Vaal while he was chilling in the Oblivion Shaft. With no magical ranged weapons they just kept chucking salt at him. Eventually they knocked off 19 points of Charisma, dropping him to 6 max HP remaining (and to AC 13). That was enough for one positive channel to kill him even in the Shaft.

The fights went long but I think the salt and the wand of ghostbane dirge kept this from being an impossible scenario.

Lady Kaviiri:
They didn't fight her. They saw the instruments and identified the tune. Then one of the players started singing a mournful sea shanty. That's one of the players, not his character. He was doing it as an out-of-character aside without realizing there would be an in-game effect. He was a bit surprised when I said "that was pretty good. Give me a perform: sing check." He made it (even without the circumstance bonus I was going to give him for actually singing) and she came through the curtain and gracefully applauded his abilities.

One of the hardest things to keep rolling along with was keeping up appearance with Tzur-Vaal. The party is going to come across a reason to be suspicious of him at some point. For my party it was when they rested after the haunt room (on the go for over a day at that point) and he couldn't prepare lesser restoration for them. He explained that he had just missed the time of day when he prays to his deity for spells and then "aided" the party by "making a really good dungeoneering check" to lead them through the maze very quickly from then on out so they wouldn't get suspicious if they rested again.

Especially with a group of experienced players it's best to just give an outline of a reason and let them fill in the details on their own.
"No, I cannot stay outside, I must find the others!"
"Oh, I guess as a paladin he has to protect his compatriots."

Shadow Lodge 4/5 5/55/55/55/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—San Francisco Bay Area North & East

James McTeague wrote:
James Anderson wrote:
Another option: A previous scenario with Benarry (Fate of the Fiend) included this line: "If the PCs need to purchase any gear, the Grinning Pixie’s quartermaster can sell them nearly any mundane or alchemical gear in addition to magic items worth 2,500 gp or less." Should that be in effect here as well?
It's on the bottom right-hand corner of page 5

And I'm blind, because I had just read the paragraph below that. Thanks.

Dark Archive 4/5 5/55/55/55/5 *****

We played this high-tier with the four player adjustment. We had 6 players of which only two were sixth. Everyone was lower.

I also enjoyed this one with Mr. Slanky GMing, but it was a tough scenario. We had no characters that were really built for dealing with incorporeal undead, but the party we brought to the table was versatile and had high system mastery. Despite this, we had a rough time even with me providing countersong to the sonic effects, and with my spellwarrior skald counterpart making all our weapons ghost touch.

Today, I watched a group play through it that had an even rougher time, avoiding the TPK by the skin of their teeth. The only thing that saved them was a Magic Circle v. Evil spell and sure grit and determination. Without really good prep, or the right kind of divine caster / necromancer, this could be a deadly scenario.

I did love the boon, though! As a Calisro Benarry fan, I squee'ed when I saw what we could get with 1PP on that chronicle sheet. Jasmine is totally buying that item. Thank you for including it.

Hmm

Shadow Lodge 5/5

I had the opportunity to run this one on Saturday. I will warn anybody planning on GMing, this one is a prep monster (at least if you want to run it well). Trying to keep up the guide of the Paladin plus juggling some fairly complicated mechanics made things tough. I did not have the situation Kevin did (I had the group just barely convinced, and they were surprised when they figured out what was really going on), but I can understand why it could be hard to keep up appearances with a group.

If the party does not figure out the ruse before the last fight, the last fight can be pretty horrible (especially if you don't have a countersonger or silencer in the group). I do though think running the fight in the shaft is overkill though, the encounter with Tzur-Vaal should be occuring prior to that room, as to not give him an even greater advantage.

One thing to remember while GMing (and remind the characters of if they're struggling is the following rule tidbit under the incorporeal subtype, "An incorporeal creature has no physical body. An incorporeal creature is immune to critical hits and precision-based damage (such as sneak attack damage) unless the attacks are made using a weapon with the ghost touch special weapon quality." Meaning, the wand of ghostbane dirge, though it has a 50% miss chance itself on an incorporeal target, once it's registered, sneak attacks and critical hits do in fact work against it.

The Exchange 4/5 5/5

MisterSlanky wrote:
If the party does not figure out the ruse before the last fight, the last fight can be pretty horrible (especially if you don't have a countersonger or silencer in the group). I do though think running the fight in the shaft is overkill though, the encounter with Tzur-Vaal should be occuring prior to that room, as to not give him an even greater advantage.

The last fight was by far the most challenging. Allips can be nasty but since you are immune to a specific allip once you save its not terrible (especially since their relatively low attack bonus means they often attack a fascinated creature - breaking the effect - but miss.)

Tzur-Vaal's tactics call for him to fight in the Shaft once Aluu-Nevka is killed. But if the party flees he will follow them. As long as you are adequately describing the healing he is receiving I think it's a good chance for parties to learn "sometimes you need to run."

Quote:
One thing to remember while GMing (and remind the characters of if they're struggling is the following rule tidbit under the incorporeal subtype, "An incorporeal creature has no physical body. An incorporeal creature is immune to critical hits and precision-based damage (such as sneak attack damage) unless the attacks are made using a weapon with the ghost touch special weapon quality." Meaning, the wand of ghostbane dirge, though it has a 50% miss chance itself on an incorporeal target, once it's registered, sneak attacks and critical hits do in fact work against it.

Ghostbane dirge does not have a miss chance (though there is a save). I don't believe it allows criticals and sneak attack to function as it "coalesces into a semi-physical form" and still only takes half damage from non-magical weapons. Is there a FAQ stating otherwise?

Dark Archive 4/5 5/5 ****

Kevin Willis wrote:
Ghostbane dirge does not have a miss chance (though there is a save). I don't believe it allows criticals and sneak attack to function as it "coalesces into a semi-physical form" and still only takes half damage from non-magical weapons. Is there a FAQ stating otherwise?

@Kevin:

Incorporeal wrote:
Corporeal spells and effects that do not cause damage only have a 50% chance of affecting an incorporeal creature.

Nothing in ghostbane dirge counteracts that statement.

However, on rereading the spell, incorporeal quality, and incorporeal undead subtype, I would tend to agree with you on the critical/sneak attack piece.

The Exchange 4/5 5/5

Bah, you're right about the miss chance. The Bestiary includes that language but the CRB (where I was looking) does not.

You know, if I had written ghostbane dirge I would have it ignore that part. It already suffers from SR and requires a saving throw, as well as being a very limited duration. And it's a spell specifically designed to affect incorporeal creatures.

Dark Archive 4/5 5/5 ****

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I agree 100% that it should ignore the miss chance... but...

On the other hand, in addition to the higher save DC, that wrapping should have allowed it to bypass the miss chance :)

Grand Lodge 4/5 **** Developer

5 people marked this as a favorite.
Jack Brown wrote:

I agree 100% that it should ignore the miss chance... but...

On the other hand, in addition to the higher save DC, that wrapping should have allowed it to bypass the miss chance :)

In developing the scenario, I thought that the spell did not suffer a 50% mischance. Making an official ruling on the spell would be a matter for the design team, but for PFS purposes, I'll take Jack's solution.

The wrapping around the wand of ghostbane dirge allows it to bypass the 50% mischance.

Shadow Lodge 5/5

Kevin Willis wrote:
As long as you are adequately describing the healing he is receiving I think it's a good chance for parties to learn "sometimes you need to run."

The lesson that got me to quit PFS for 2 years...

Quote:
Ghostbane dirge does not have a miss chance (though there is a save). I don't believe it allows criticals and sneak attack to function as it "coalesces into a semi-physical form" and still only takes half damage from non-magical weapons. Is there a FAQ stating otherwise?

We looked this one up. Please reference where Ghostbane Dirge does not have the 50% miss chance. The incorporeal type gives a 50% on all spells, so it should have the same penalty as anything. I'll try to dig out the rules route we followed.

Shadow Lodge 5/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Here's our path to figuring out Ghostbane Dirge.

Ghostly qualities include...
Ghosts have the incorporeal subtype and the incorporeal defensive ability.

The Incorporeal subtype reads...
An incorporeal creature has no physical body. An incorporeal creature is immune to critical hits and precision-based damage (such as sneak attack damage) unless the attacks are made using a weapon with the ghost touch special weapon quality. In addition, creatures with the incorporeal subtype gain the incorporeal special quality.

The Incorporeal Monster Rules reade..
An incorporeal creature has no physical body. It can be harmed only by other incorporeal creatures, magic weapons or creatures that strike as magic weapons, and spells, spell-like abilities, or supernatural abilities. It is immune to all nonmagical attack forms. Even when hit by spells or magic weapons, it takes only half damage from a corporeal source (except for channel energy). Although it is not a magical attack, holy water can affect incorporeal undead. Corporeal spells and effects that do not cause damage only have a 50% chance of affecting an incorporeal creature. Force spells and effects, such as from a magic missile, affect an incorporeal creature normally.

So the ruling would be

A casting of ghostbane dirge is subject to the Incorporeal Monster Rule of "Corporeal spells and effects that do not cause damage only have a 50% chance of affecting an incorporeal creature".

Assuming that you make the 50% check, save is successful, etc. Then the subject takes full damage, doesn't get a 50% miss chance on spells/spell-like abilities, as noted.

Now, if you can get ghost touch (not ghostbane dirge) on your weapons, then rather than referecing the Incorporeal Monster Rule, you have to go to the Incorporeal Subtype and read that..."An incorporeal creature is immune to critical hits and precision-based damage (such as sneak attack damage) unless the attacks are made using a weapon with the ghost touch special weapon quality."

At this point they're subject to critical hits and sneak attack.

It's kind of a double whammy. My group didn't use the ghostbane dirge to cancel out the Monster Rule, but rather ghost touch to cancel out the incorporeal subtype.

Aaah Pathfinder rules complications and the need to look in four places for the rule.

The clarification
Regardless of what I just wrote though, the discussion of ghostbane dirge is moot per this post here.

Dark Archive 4/5 5/5 ****

Linda Zayas-Palmer wrote:
Jack Brown wrote:

I agree 100% that it should ignore the miss chance... but...

On the other hand, in addition to the higher save DC, that wrapping should have allowed it to bypass the miss chance :)

In developing the scenario, I thought that the spell did not suffer a 50% mischance. Making an official ruling on the spell would be a matter for the design team, but for PFS purposes, I'll take Jack's solution.

The wrapping around the wand of ghostbane dirge allows it to bypass the 50% mischance.

Thank you, Linda.

I think that's a fantastic solution to the problem... we don't have to tell the PCs that it will work, but just let it work. At levels 3-4, that might be the only way that they can survive certain fights (since they may not have magic weapons, yet).

Grand Lodge 4/5 5/55/55/55/5 ***** Venture-Agent, Minnesota

Linda and Jack, that's a fantastic solution to the problem!

It would have made a huge difference in the game I witnessed on Sunday. They ended the battle with three of the players down, and the other three huddled in a protection from evil spell, desperately trying to hit the ghost with magic weapons and cure light spells... They nearly went down because they could not get the Ghostbane Dirge wand to work!

Hmm

Shadow Lodge 5/5

Hmm wrote:
They ended the battle with three of the players down, and the other three huddled in a protection from evil spell, desperately trying to hit the ghost with magic weapons and cure light spells... They nearly went down because they could not get the Ghostbane Dirge wand to work!Hmm

I'm curious what the Protection from evil spell did beyond provide a +2 to AC. Protection from evil prevents mental control of the target (and specifies specific examples via enchantment) but does not prevent possession. In fact, the spell specifically indicates that you can possess somebody protected, you just cannot cause any control over the target.

In this case I'd suspect the ghost smart enough to know that he just needs to wait out the duration of the spell. Now, I realize that in the scope of a game, this timing is problematic, but it's worth noting that it's not really the magic bullet.

Shadow Lodge 4/5 5/55/55/55/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—San Francisco Bay Area North & East

Would be interesting to take a Dhampir in there (rare, I know). Or something else that had reversed takes on negative energy. "What do you mean the scenario's over? This well feels great!"

Death domain gives it to clerics, but not till level 8, so the scenario's safe from them.

3/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber

I ran a table of Ghosts last night.

Questions if I run this again:

1) What happens if a possessed Jaohd is caught in a positive channel energy to damage undead accidentally or intentionally?
a) Nothing
b) Damage directed to Jaohd's body
c) Damage directed to Tzur-Vaal soul
d) If b) or c) is there any outward appearance that would alert the party. I'm not sure if I've ever heard anyone describe what it looks like while its affecting an undead.

2) What happens (if anything) if holy water is thrown or splashed on a possessed Jaohd?

3) Does the hazard that was previously clarified to only affect walls not floors, affect doors?

4) Does the allip's babble break fascinate on creatures currently fascinated by a different allip? For example, allip1 emerges from the silence area and some PCs are fascinated. Allip2 emerges, what happens:
a) All fascinated by allip1 freed and all make a new will save to against allip2?
b) All fascinated by allip1 get a new save against allip1, and all free after that make a new will save to against allip2?
c) Only those free make a will save to avoid allip2 fascinate?
d) Only those free make a will save to avoid allip2 fascinate, but when those fascinated by allip1 are freed then they save against allip2?
e) All make a new will save to avoid allip2 fascinate and track the babbles concurrently?
f) something else?

Notes from my session:

1) This is a prep monster, do not underestimate it or you will fail your GM fort save against exhaustion. Looking back on the session with 20/20 hindsight I see I made a few mistakes both in favor of and against the party so at least the oops went both ways. But the short list of prep: Possessed NPC (potentially possessing a PC) and all the "what if"s that come with that, incorporeal monsters (note: the subtype and the ability grant different complementary effects), gaseous monsters, haunt and ecoplasmic monsters in the same encounter, hazards, environmental effects (unnatural fog), monsters that fascinate/age damage/energy drain/stat damage, multiple enemies with caster levels, etc. It was quite the mix.

2) This ran long... We finished at the max time for our gaming room at 5.5 hours. We could probably have used another 30 minutes to wrap things up properly, and even more as we went light on the role playing with the paladin trying to get through the encounters without running out of time.

3) Outdoor combat took a long time at high tier, the fog played a good part limiting visibility and the PCs focus was split with all the sailors.

4) The multiple allips could be deadly with the 60' babble range. With only two PC's and two minions free, they chose to engage the allips and paladin instead of freeing the other four PCs. This drew out this fight a lot longer then it could have been with most of the party active. IMPORTANT: In addition to tracking HOW LONG a PC is fascinated for you need to track WHICH allip has them under fascination. Per the fascinate condition, "...taking no actions other than to pay attention to the fascinating effect, for as long as the effect lasts." Therefore, I would assume the effect ends when the particular allip is dead as did a PC. When the first allip went down the question arose around the table of "Was that the one that fascinated me?" The PC's were all tracking their fascinate rounds ticking down a die, but I forgot to record or have them record which allip.

Comments to Dev Team:

1) Stat Blocks - Looking past the one that was just left out noted earlier in the thread, there was a significant amount of page flipping necessary due to some stat blocks being published at the end, while others being published inline. I understand it saves pages if there are multiple encounters with creature X and the stats are just printed at the back. Is there a reason the custom ones get put in-line instead of at the end with the rest? Otherwise it's almost necessary to re-compile them like some kind soul does on pfsprep.com.

2) My high tier players lamented that while the wand had a boosted DC, but the scenario did not specify a boosted caster level too. This meant it was unlikely to be useful against high-tier Tzur-Vaal due to his high SR, even with the 50% incorporeal errata above in the thread.

3) The awesome wall hazard never came into play. None of my players voluntarily wanted to touch a wall after the description given in the text block starting the labyrinth. I had previously asked if it affected floors and the answer was no, but I forgot to ask about doors as each room on the map has one.

4) Atanda - Low tier she's basically another slightly special sailor, high tier she's a halfling druid who's tactic is to wildshape into a huge triceratops. I believe the general feel from the table was "Did that just happen?" This just felt completely random.

5) The map is AWESOME, but ONLY if you print it or have a way to show the players. Printing it provides an artistic way of showing that this is a huge maze, without having to go to the nitty gritty having a huge map and worked well with the travel mechanic.

6) Tactics - Some of the encounters in here were much more devious then I'm used to for PFS. The dancing haunt + ecoplasmic rogues who try to flank and have combat reflexes for AOOs... Whew... <insert evil grin here>

Liberty's Edge 4/5

When I read about the oblivion shaft I thought it would be amazing if the next scenario of the series starts with Venture-Captain Benarry suggesting the Pathfinders drink from the Chalice of Undeath that appeared in You Only Die Twice. It would be a cool connection to past scenarios and show that the Pathfinders use the artifacts they find when it is appropriate.

Scarab Sages 4/5 **

Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path Subscriber

For the labyrinth part of the adventure (area B2), where do the PCs go when they successfully navigate the labyrinth? Is it linear (they go to B3 via B2a, then to B4 via B2b, then B5 via B2C) or can they reach one area at random?

Not sure how this is supposed to work - the PCs are wandering a labyrinth, with no particular goal in mind (how do they even know there are three encounter areas to go to? how do they know they've finished exploring, i.e. how do they know there isn't a fourth area via B2d?)

Grand Lodge 4/5

The PCs navigate to the rooms in order. Area B2 is a large extra-dimensional labyrinth, but according to the text there is no way to skip a room via the extra-dimensional corridors. Successful skill checks move them to the next room, not any other room.

The Exchange 4/5 5/5

jcg wrote:

I ran a table of Ghosts last night.

Questions if I run this again:

1) What happens if a possessed Jaohd is caught in a positive channel energy to damage undead accidentally or intentionally?
a) Nothing
b) Damage directed to Jaohd's body
c) Damage directed to Tzur-Vaal soul
d) If b) or c) is there any outward appearance that would alert the party. I'm not sure if I've ever heard anyone describe what it looks like while its affecting an undead.

2) What happens (if anything) if holy water is thrown or splashed on a possessed Jaohd?

3) Does the hazard that was previously clarified to only affect walls not floors, affect doors?

4) Does the allip's babble break fascinate on creatures currently fascinated by a different allip? For example, allip1 emerges from the silence area and some PCs are fascinated. Allip2 emerges, what happens:
a) All fascinated by allip1 freed and all make a new will save to against allip2?
b) All fascinated by allip1 get a new save against allip1, and all free after that make a new will save to against allip2?
c) Only those free make a will save to avoid allip2 fascinate?
d) Only those free make a will save to avoid allip2 fascinate, but when those fascinated by allip1 are freed then they save against allip2?
e) All make a new will save to avoid allip2 fascinate and track the babbles concurrently?
f) something else?

1 and 2 both affect the physical body. When a creature is possessed it has the mental traits of the possessor but the physical attributes of the possessed. So for those two it wouldn't have an effect. However other effects like smite evil would affect him. It's a bit grey but my rule of thumb is to look at whether there's any mental component to the effect.

1. Nothing
2. He gets wet.
3. It's really just a cool effect to describe, so I would totally let it happen on a door if no one is touching the wall. Don't try and make it a "gotcha."
4. e. Each allip is tracked independently. One important thing to note is that even though the fascinate has a duration, characters are not immune after the duration ends (or the fascinate is broken in some other way). At the start of each allip's turn each character who has not made a save and is not currently fascinated by that allip needs to make a new save. In practice this means that even if you are fascinated by several you will gradually become immune to them as you pass saves.

Grand Lodge 3/5

Just played through it and I loved it.

The Great Dance:
We wiped the haunt with a double channel as we saw it for what it was the second we opened the door (I almost wish we triggered it though, I love how it works).

I'd also like to throw a shout out to the author, for...

The Universal Language:
putting Perform(Sing) in yet another scenario. My Gaston-esque paladin of Shelyn once again rocked an encounter because of it. I reflexively started singing along and held my initial smite-o-rama reaction because the lady clearly had an appreciation for music. After hearing the request, I had no problem agreeing since I had no reason to think she wasn't asking to be released. 50 dpk plus for such a fun interaction!

(also... Another paladin of Shelyn! We even got to save him! :DDDDD)

1/5 RPG Superstar 2014 Top 32

I was a player in this scenario, and thought it may be useful to get some clarification on how the Allip fascination effect works.

Fascinated condition wrote:
Fascinated: A fascinated creature is entranced by a supernatural or spell effect. The creature stands or sits quietly, taking no actions other than to pay attention to the fascinating effect, for as long as the effect lasts. It takes a –4 penalty on skill checks made as reactions, such as Perception checks. Any potential threat, such as a hostile creature approaching, allows the fascinated creature a new saving throw against the fascinating effect. Any obvious threat, such as someone drawing a weapon, casting a spell, or aiming a ranged weapon at the fascinated creature, automatically breaks the effect. A fascinated creature's ally may shake it free of the spell as a standard action.
Allip Babble wrote:
Babble (Su) An allip constantly mutters to itself, creating a hypnotic effect. All sane creatures within 60 feet of the allip must succeed at a DC 15 Will save or be fascinated for 2d4 rounds. While a target is fascinated, the allip can approach it without breaking the effect, but an attack by the allip does end the effect. Creatures that successfully save cannot be affected by the same allip's babble for 24 hours. This is a sonic, mind-affecting compulsion effect. The save DC is Charisma-based.

My interpretation is that if any Hostile creature besides the Allip which has you fascinated approaches or attacks or threatens you, this should give you another save as stated in the general fascinated condition above.

The way the GM ruled was that only the Allip which has you fascinated can potentially break the fascination, and all other hostile creatures can pummel away on you. This led to 5 of 6 players fascinated, and the GM basically rolling dice by himself for about 30 minutes.

SO, maybe if the way the Babble interacts with other hostile creatures can be clarified here, future tables won't be twiddling their thumbs for longer than necessary.

Grand Lodge 3/5

Quote:

My interpretation is that if any Hostile creature besides the Allip which has you fascinated approaches or attacks or threatens you, this should give you another save as stated in the general fascinated condition above.

The way the GM ruled was that only the Allip which has you fascinated can potentially break the fascination, and all other hostile creatures can pummel away on you. This led to 5 of 6 players fascinated, and the GM basically rolling dice by himself for about 30 minutes.

SO, maybe if the way the Babble interacts with other hostile creatures can be clarified here, future tables won't be twiddling their...

You're correct, anything can snap you out of a fascination, including a standard action from an ally or (I believe) any damage.

Contributor, RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, 2011 Top 32, 2012 Top 4

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Please consider posting a review (good or bad). It's a great way to help me hone my scenario writing skills. Plus, if there are enough good reviews maybe, just maybe, we'll get to return to the Gloomspires some day. Who wants to know what lurks at the bottom of the Oblivion Shaft? (Trust me, your characters don't.) ;-)

3/5

Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber
Sam King wrote:
Quote:

My interpretation is that if any Hostile creature besides the Allip which has you fascinated approaches or attacks or threatens you, this should give you another save as stated in the general fascinated condition above.

The way the GM ruled was that only the Allip which has you fascinated can potentially break the fascination, and all other hostile creatures can pummel away on you. This led to 5 of 6 players fascinated, and the GM basically rolling dice by himself for about 30 minutes.

SO, maybe if the way the Babble interacts with other hostile creatures can be clarified here, future tables won't be twiddling their...

You're correct, anything can snap you out of a fascination, including a standard action from an ally or (I believe) any damage.

Agree with this interpretation, fascinate is easy to break. The babble ability explicitly says the allip that has you fascinated can approach, but its attack will break fascinate. Attacks from other creatures would break it as well as friendly "snap out of it" actions. The only caveat being that since you didn't save against a given allip you could become fascinated again by said given allip.

If I run this again, I'll use a simple table with allip 1-3 across the top and PC/Compainions (that would be subject to sonic mind-affecting) down the left side, and grid it out. Write immune in corresponding squares whenever a save is made, and track all the fascinate rounds by number in the respective square. Make it easy to visualize if a PC can act and which allip has it fascinated.

Thanks Kevin for answering my questions above.

I'll add a review tonight. Overall I loved it. Only thing that felt odd was the Triceratops druid... Had she transformed into a huge salt water crocodile (with an odd ticking sound ;-) ) or something else related to being a sailor it would have flowed better IMHO. I would rate this as a high-prep scenario though. That's not a bad thing as those are often the most interesting to play, it's just not one I think would be run well cold without prep.


The statistics for the possessed Ilzinian don't include any of his feats. I know that when Tzur Vaal uses Possession, he is not able to use any of the body's activated extraordinary or supernatural abilities. However, Blind-Fight and Improved Initiative aren't activated and they provide constant bonuses. The Possession spell states that the body retains it automatic abilities. Is this referring to effects purely based on race? Should Tzur Vaal never gain access to his host's feats, regardless of what feats a PC might have?

4/5

MisterSlanky wrote:
Quote:
Ghostbane dirge does not have a miss chance (though there is a save). I don't believe it allows criticals and sneak attack to function as it "coalesces into a semi-physical form" and still only takes half damage from non-magical weapons. Is there a FAQ stating otherwise?
We looked this one up. Please reference where Ghostbane Dirge does not have the 50% miss chance. The incorporeal type gives a 50% on all spells, so it should have the same penalty as anything. I'll try to dig out the rules route we followed.

The target for Ghostbane Dirge is "one incorporeal creature": to me, that indicates that it should effect incorporeal subtypes.

Dark Archive 2/5

Dorothy Lindman wrote:
MisterSlanky wrote:
Quote:
Ghostbane dirge does not have a miss chance (though there is a save). I don't believe it allows criticals and sneak attack to function as it "coalesces into a semi-physical form" and still only takes half damage from non-magical weapons. Is there a FAQ stating otherwise?
We looked this one up. Please reference where Ghostbane Dirge does not have the 50% miss chance. The incorporeal type gives a 50% on all spells, so it should have the same penalty as anything. I'll try to dig out the rules route we followed.

The target for Ghostbane Dirge is "one incorporeal creature": to me, that indicates that it should effect incorporeal subtypes.

I see how you might read it like that but the description of the target within the spell description should in no way invalidate existing type/subtype effects or other restrictions.

For example, the target for the spell Suggestion is 'one living creature'.

The language dependent requirement does not cease to exist because the target is indeed 'one living creature'.

Silver Crusade 4/5

Sounds like ghostbane dirge might make a good campaign clarification document candidate.

BTW - if there's a bard playing at the table, they're going to make several of these encounters pretty easy. Or at least mine did. :-)

Shadow Lodge 5/5

Well this particular ghostbane dirge was clarified.

Quote:

In developing the scenario, I thought that the spell did not suffer a 50% mischance. Making an official ruling on the spell would be a matter for the design team, but for PFS purposes, I'll take Jack's solution.

The wrapping around the wand of ghostbane dirge allows it to bypass the 50% mischance.

So it's pretty much a moot point. All spells against incorporeal opponents have a 50% miss chance (as Eindridi demonstrated). This one does not.

Silver Crusade 4/5

We played this at my local store yesterday: 2 tables, one at each subtier.

Both tables only got 1 prestige, because the paladin died. Playing at low tier, we had an archer rapid shot him and get a "lucky" crit on the second shot after the first knocked him down to staggered, so he went down hard. The high tier table told us that he bled out after going down in their fight.

Overall, this is a pretty brutal adventure. We were right on the cusp of being forced to play up with the low tier adjustment, because half our group was level 5, but we still had a very tough time in that final fight with the allips, possessed paladin, and the ghosts.

It was a lot of fun, though. Our bard sang his way through the one encounter with the ghost lady, so we made friends with her. When she asked for her ashes to be spread out to sea, my cleric of Besmara (Green Beard - because what else would you call a half-orc pirate?) was happy to do it.

Green Beard needs to find adventures with less undead, though. This is his second in a row where he's faced undead that were immune to most of his best stuff. As a negative channeling cleric, he felt a little useless, though he had plenty of other useful spells and abilities, and he was the one wielding the wand of Ghostbane Dirge. Luckily, we also had a positive channeling cleric in the party, which helped a LOT.

Green Beard's biggest complaint is that even after proving his bravery and loyalty to the Society by visiting the Gloomspires twice, Venture-Captain Calisro Benarry still won't agree to marry him!

Scarab Sages 4/5 **

Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path Subscriber

I had fun running this - players had a great time.

They didn't figure out what was wrong with the Paladin, so he jumped them in the final encounter. They were smart and knocked him out, only to have the ghost turn around and possess someone else.

I couldn't find it in the possession rules, but I ruled that a Protection from Evil cast on a possessed person granted a new save (after you make a touch attack to deliver the spell).

Fun Tip: Hint that the Paladin is a multi-classed Oracle/Paladin, and that his "tongues" curse got turned on permanently. This completely fooled my players (they failed the Sense Motive in character, but this OOC comment had the PLAYERS convinced as well). It's a known combo for Paladins to single dip to Oracle to get Charisma for AC (so no reason an NPC couldn't do it also)....

Shadow Lodge 4/5

3 people marked this as a favorite.

Losing the main mission: 1 pp
Missing out on final room loot: around 1,100 gp
Using ghost touch to smooch the lady: priceless

4/5

Eindridi wrote:
Dorothy Lindman wrote:
MisterSlanky wrote:
Quote:
Ghostbane dirge does not have a miss chance (though there is a save). I don't believe it allows criticals and sneak attack to function as it "coalesces into a semi-physical form" and still only takes half damage from non-magical weapons. Is there a FAQ stating otherwise?
We looked this one up. Please reference where Ghostbane Dirge does not have the 50% miss chance. The incorporeal type gives a 50% on all spells, so it should have the same penalty as anything. I'll try to dig out the rules route we followed.

The target for Ghostbane Dirge is "one incorporeal creature": to me, that indicates that it should effect incorporeal subtypes.

I see how you might read it like that but the description of the target within the spell description should in no way invalidate existing type/subtype effects or other restrictions.

For example, the target for the spell Suggestion is 'one living creature'.

The language dependent requirement does not cease to exist because the target is indeed 'one living creature'.

But the language limitation is included as part of the Suggestion spell: "[language-dependent, mind-affecting]". If the Suggestion spell did not include that line, then it would not require you to have a common language if you cast it on a "living creature".

Likewise, it has the description "mind-effecting" so it specifically won't work on mindless living creatures. Those descriptors are limitations on the valid target "living creature".

What words in Ghostbane Dirge puts limitations on the target "incorporeal creature"? I don't see any.

Grand Lodge 3/5

Muser wrote:

Losing the main mission: 1 pp

Missing out on final room loot: around 1,100 gp
Using ghost touch to smooch the lady: priceless

You are my spirit animal.

Grandpoobah wrote:
I couldn't find it in the possession rules, but I ruled that a Protection from Evil cast on a possessed person granted a new save (after you make a touch attack to deliver the spell).

It does and with a +2 moral bonus to the save, details are under Protection From Evil (spell). If they have it up ahead of time, it makes them immune to possession vs. evil aligned creatures. It's a pretty great spell for that fight, to be sure.

Grand Lodge 5/5

Under the "Features: Twisted Magic and Dangerous Geometry" section, what is the intended caster alignment for the Forbiddance effect, if any? Or, was it intentionally omitted given that it the effect is defined as a variant form?

Grand Lodge 5/5

The Gloomspires are permanently enshrouded in wind-resistant mists that operate like fog cloud, albeit providing concealment up to 20' and total concealment > 20'. So, walking around the surface is particularly creepy. However, that leaves me with some questions.

Spoiler:
The campfire will provide only poor illumination for this area at a 20' radius and not sure it would be burning very well during a driving rain (intro).

Spoiler:
Atanda has Precise Shot (which will not operate with concealment) and is subject to total concealment beyond 20'. So, in sub-tier 3-4, her tactic of hanging back to shoot at opponents is not going to go very well for her with -8 to hit and a 20% or 50% miss chance. She would need Improved Precise Shot to ignore concealment, but would still be hampered by total concealment.

Spoiler:
In sub-tier 6-7, Atanda does significant buffing "as the PCs approach the Spire." However, since she can't see them until they are 20' away (and especially if they are stealthing on approach), she doesn't know they are approaching. She's also probably not aware of the fact that the Grinning Pixie has arrived because she can't see it looking outward from the mist at ground level and likely can't hear it. With all the howling winds (that may not affect the wind-resistant Spire fog), driving rain and thunder and lightning going off as in the intro, it is unlikely that any PCs will be heard on approach. Looking into the Gloomspires from the seaward side, it should be possible to see them from 500' away. However, once in the mist on the Spire, it seems like vision would be limited by the enveloping mist at 20'.

One possible solution is to treat the howling wind as equivalent to Gust of Wind that has temporarily displaced the mists and/or reduced the effect or extended visibility. However, in either case, the fire probably isn't doing very well (or reasonably can't even remain lit).

Do you have any preferred environment or tactics suggestions to help resolve these issues? Thanks!

Grand Lodge 4/5

Why do you think Precise Shot will not operate? She will take the miss chance, but will still not have the -4 penalty to hit when her target is in melee.

Grand Lodge 5/5

I was momentarily confused. You're right. In the concealment case, with Improved Precise Shot, she would ignore the concealment miss chance and both Precise Shot and Improved Precise Shot function as normal, ignoring melee. Sorry.

However, in the total concealment case (more than 20' away), it seems like neither feat would function. With total concealment, you can only attack a square not an opponent (that you can't see).

Anyway - I would still appreciate additional suggestions re: the environment and/or tactics, since they seem to collide with the Gloomspires' mist effect.

4/5

Jack Brown wrote:
Linda Zayas-Palmer wrote:
Jack Brown wrote:

I agree 100% that it should ignore the miss chance... but...

On the other hand, in addition to the higher save DC, that wrapping should have allowed it to bypass the miss chance :)

In developing the scenario, I thought that the spell did not suffer a 50% mischance. Making an official ruling on the spell would be a matter for the design team, but for PFS purposes, I'll take Jack's solution.

The wrapping around the wand of ghostbane dirge allows it to bypass the 50% mischance.

Thank you, Linda.

I think that's a fantastic solution to the problem.

OK... we did some math at the table.... in the higher tier... (I go off vague memory here)

Chance to affect incorporeal target with corporeal spell: 50%
Chance of bypassing said targets Spell Resistance (CL 5 vs SR 19): 35%
Chance of said target failing the will save (DC 17 vs +12 Will): 20%

Chance of wand spell landing without the above mentioned change: 3.5%

Chance of wand spell landing with the above mentioned change: 7%

Either way, the wand (though great flavor) is basically a trap, and a PC is almost always better off doing just about anything else then attempting to use it.

Which is sad really... but its a problem with spell not the scenario.

1 to 50 of 96 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Organized Play / GM Discussion / 7-19 Labyrinth Of Hungry Ghosts All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.