
![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

I thought that whole "not white enough" thing was started by a group of internet trolls specifically for the purpose of getting people angry. Nobody actually thinks that.
Indeed. They went over all the original posts, less than 0.003 percent of them were actually race baiting negative. It was just to waste time and start a ruckus.

![]() |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

I need an adult
Alert ALL commands. Focus ALL firepower on Peter Stewart.
And maintain firing.

Mark Norfolk |
3 people marked this as a favorite. |

Mark Norfolk wrote:Wow, such an informed opinion. Two whole movies?I have only seen two movies in 3d and both were hideous experiences (the Ray Winstone Beowolf and Avatar).
Err... of course - that's all it took. Not sure what I'm supposed to do except keep paying a premium to have what is (for me) a ruined time at the cinema.
Other people like it and that's fine. But for me the marginal gain is not worth the added premium. That's all. I did give three reasons why I didn't like it, and one movie was supposed to be THE showcase of 3d movies.
Cheers
Mark

Orthos |
3 people marked this as a favorite. |

Mark Norfolk wrote:Wow, such an informed opinion. Two whole movies?I have only seen two movies in 3d and both were hideous experiences (the Ray Winstone Beowolf and Avatar).
Exactly how many times do you have to see something you don't like before you realize "Hey, I don't like this thing, I should avoid it"?

![]() |
3 people marked this as a favorite. |

Hama wrote:Exactly how many times do you have to see something you don't like before you realize "Hey, I don't like this thing, I should avoid it"?Mark Norfolk wrote:Wow, such an informed opinion. Two whole movies?I have only seen two movies in 3d and both were hideous experiences (the Ray Winstone Beowolf and Avatar).
Well, I still haven't seen Cloverfield, because I vomited after watching Blair Witch. All it takes is once when you have motion sickness from shaky-cam.

Bellona |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

+1 here for seeing it in 2D. In fact, I've bought tickets for two different showings of the movie at one of the biggest local cinemas - one of the tickets is even for the opening day on 16/12 :) - and both will be in 2D.
The cinema is more or less alternating between 2D and 3D showings, favouring the 3D the first five days, before switching over to a 50/50 percent divide. (Granted, the opening day has four showings in 3D and only one in 2D.)

Freehold DM |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Orthos wrote:Well, I still haven't seen Cloverfield, because I vomited after watching Blair Witch. All it takes is once when you have motion sickness from shaky-cam.Hama wrote:Exactly how many times do you have to see something you don't like before you realize "Hey, I don't like this thing, I should avoid it"?Mark Norfolk wrote:Wow, such an informed opinion. Two whole movies?I have only seen two movies in 3d and both were hideous experiences (the Ray Winstone Beowolf and Avatar).
cloverfield is one of my favorite movies, saw it in theatres 3 times. So many people ran out of the theatre throwing up, it's not funny. More needs to be done to make 3d enjoyable for everyone, not just those of us with strong constitutions.

Freehold DM |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Hama wrote:Exactly how many times do you have to see something you don't like before you realize "Hey, I don't like this thing, I should avoid it"?Mark Norfolk wrote:Wow, such an informed opinion. Two whole movies?I have only seen two movies in 3d and both were hideous experiences (the Ray Winstone Beowolf and Avatar).
This line of reasoning has lead to too much stupidity over the course of human history to be load-bearing.

Orthos |

Orthos wrote:This line of reasoning has lead to too much stupidity over the course of human history to be load-bearing.Hama wrote:Exactly how many times do you have to see something you don't like before you realize "Hey, I don't like this thing, I should avoid it"?Mark Norfolk wrote:Wow, such an informed opinion. Two whole movies?I have only seen two movies in 3d and both were hideous experiences (the Ray Winstone Beowolf and Avatar).
... what?

Freehold DM |

The only thing I can say about the movie is that it BETTER NOT be going into Darksaber territory...

![]() |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

baron arem heshvaun wrote:The only thing I can say about the movie is that it BETTER NOT be going into Darksaber territory...
Luke went dark in Dark Empire, and that was a pretty cool storyline...

![]() |

Freehold DM wrote:The only thing I can say about the movie is that it BETTER NOT be going into Darksaber territory...By Kevin J. Anderson.
The Jar Jar Binks author of the Expanded Universe.
How I loathe thee sir, how I loathe thee.
Yeah, I hate his Star Wars books, but I actually enjoy his Dune books, especially the Butlerian Jihad. After God-Emperor, Herbert became unreadable.

Turin the Mad |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

3-D has gotten far, far less intrusive and disruptive over the past several years, to wit the more recent MCU and Disney films. The smoothness of it marks a wonderful progression in 3-D viewing development, on the order of 1970s 3-D vs. modern IMAX 3-D as compared the improvement from Beowulf to current-year and near-future MCU 3-D films.
However, those with certain viewing sensitivities are well-advised to heed those warnings. It doesn't hurt that many of the large screen formats in play these days are very nearly as good.

Sissyl |

Motion sickness due to 3D depends directly on sitting the wrong distance away. How big one's tolerance is varies. Sitting far back is probably a good idea.
Then again, I find it doesn't bring much either. Very few scenes use it for more than background and foreground. And I loathe the "let's throw stuff at you" moronity. Not to speak of HFR.

ShinHakkaider |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Took me two hours from when I got the notification from Fandango that the tickets were on sale to get my ticket. I'm going on the 18th at AMC 25 in Times Square. Thier Dolby theater is showing it in what I'm guessing is regular digital projection, (did Abrahms shoot this in 35mm?) no 3D.
I saw a screening of CRIMSON PEAK there about 3 -4 weeks ago and it was all cushioned, reclining chairs, great projection and great sound.
I'll be taking my mom again during Christmas weekend. She took me to see the first Star Wars in Times Square when I was 6 or 7 years old. It's only fair I return the favor...

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Vic Wertz wrote:Just wondering, you you have any actual data on 3D pre-sales vs 2D pre-sales? I'm not assuming you're lying, I'm just curious but haven't really looked in to it myself.Aranna wrote:I think it's pretty clear who won the "how to save theaters" argument between Sielberg and Cameron. Clearly Spielberg was right. What was this argument? Back not long ago theaters were failing and every year fewer people saw movies as home entertainment was king. Cameron said the way to save theaters was to move to a format people couldn't watch at home... 3d. Spielberg disagreed and said the way forward was to make each movie into a big event that you HAD to be there for to enjoy it best.If you're using The Force Awakens ticket presales as evidence for "Spielberg's side," note that a significant quantity of those presales—I'd guess the majority, actually—are for 3D showings...
As I said, I'm guessing. Data doesn't seem to be available.

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Matrix Dragon wrote:Heh, I actually enjoyed watching Avatar in 3D. I think it added a lot to the movie.IMO the 3d and visual effects were the only memorable thing about the movie. It was almost insultingly bland and forgettable otherwise.
The visuals and the use of 3d (which was groundbreaking back then) was the point of the movie, though. Sure, sequels are happening because of $$$, and because Cameron himself is passionate about the project - but originally, Avatar was really just an excuse to display new technology.

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

The real impact of Avatar was the sheer beauty of the setting. Don't you remember the articles about Post Avatar Depression? Still, I maintain, the third dimension, even in Avatar, was put to poor use. See, not many scenes really hinge on spatial positioning.
No. But it was really the first time that actual, workable 3d technology was put in display in a big budget movie. There simply was no movie before that which actually had 3d that integrated seemlessly with the other visuals and wasn't clunky or horrendous or gimmicky.
That helped the visuals be even more immersive and impressive than they would have otherwise, and the result was something breathtaking in the historical scale. Well, cinema history at least. With hundreds of movies using badly integrated, last-minute hackjob 3d tech since then it becomes easy to forget just how new this was with Avatar. When it came out, there were ways in which it was truly different from any movie that came before.
The 3d wasn't used in some elaborate way - all it needed to do was work well and combine seamlessly with the beautiful visuals.

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Stephen Colbert's The Force Awakens Predictions
I'm leaning for Lando to get an honorable mention in the movie and for a Yoda Force Spirit cameo.

![]() |

Am I one of the people that actually liked Avatar as a movie (with or without the 3d?). I am hoping Avatar 2 takes 3d into space more though, and gives us an absolutely spectacular 3d space battle!
I loved it. It sent a nice message. Albeit in a ham fisted way but still a nice message.

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

J.J. Abrams interviewed by a select panel from a US Senate Subcommittee

Bjørn Røyrvik |
Bjørn Røyrvik wrote:Except for Quaritch.Matrix Dragon wrote:Heh, I actually enjoyed watching Avatar in 3D. I think it added a lot to the movie.IMO the 3d and visual effects were the only memorable thing about the movie. It was almost insultingly bland and forgettable otherwise.
Who?
(No, I'm not being sarcastic, I honestly don't remember who you're talking about)