| jbadams |
Blood of Dragons specifically states Sorcerer levels, so I don't think it would stack levels with Bloodrager. For non-PFS campaigns your GM may choose to house-rule otherwise though.
A Bloodrager bloodline is actually different than a Sorcerer one, so I think you would have two different sets of bloodline abilities that are tracked and calculated separately.
| Night_Shade |
I have seen this debate a few times, but unless there is an entirely different sets of write ups, such as a sorcerers draconic bloodline which is different in writing as well as a blood ragers draconic bloodline, there is no different bloodline. all it says in the blood ragers write up is "A bloodrager must pick one bloodline upon taking his first level of bloodrager" The fact that they gain their abilities at different points then a sorcerer is fines since it is not a sorcerer, but it is the same things at different levels.
If it is suppose to be different, then a new set of blood lines should be written up showing that their powers and abilities are different so that one cn say that they do not overlap or stack with each other because they are different in their write ups.
Just my 2 cents worth... but thanks for the reply.
| Cult of Vorg |
Skipping the DD, sorc and BR bloodlines aren't pick one class and combine levels for effective bloodline, they'd be tracked separately instead.
DD should continue that. If there's no sorc levels involved, technically it would give an effective sorc bloodline level, independent of any BR levels.
It's a reasonable house rule to let DD increase BR bloodline instead, but it would be a house rule.
| chbgraphicarts |
Bloodrager is a Dragon Disciple in base-class form.
Though if your players want to go Bloodrager > DD then it's reasonable to rule that Blood of Dragons stacks with levels of ALL classes that grant Bloodlines.
One major thing to remember is that DD was written well before Alternate Class Features were a thing, and at the time it wasn't a certainty that anything BESIDES Sorcerer would gain a Bloodline.
Obviously now you have several different ways of gaining true Bloodlines, so Dragon Disciple may either get a rewrite at some point, or it should just be assumed in homegames to work with any class granting the Draconic Bloodline, not just Sorcerers alone.
| jbadams |
but unless there is an entirely different sets of write ups, such as a sorcerers draconic bloodline which is different in writing as well as a blood ragers draconic bloodline, there is no different bloodline.
They ARE different write-ups with different abilities; granted Draconic happens to be very similar, but some other bloodlines vary significantly between Sorcerer and Bloodrager write-ups.
If you check the class descriptions side-by-side you'll see it's not just the same powers at different levels (which still wouldn't be the same anyway) but actually significantly different abilities for some bloodlines.
| Cap. Darling |
I have seen this debate a few times, but unless there is an entirely different sets of write ups, such as a sorcerers draconic bloodline which is different in writing as well as a blood ragers draconic bloodline, there is no different bloodline. all it says in the blood ragers write up is "A bloodrager must pick one bloodline upon taking his first level of bloodrager" The fact that they gain their abilities at different points then a sorcerer is fines since it is not a sorcerer, but it is the same things at different levels.
If it is suppose to be different, then a new set of blood lines should be written up showing that their powers and abilities are different so that one cn say that they do not overlap or stack with each other because they are different in their write ups.
Just my 2 cents worth... but thanks for the reply.
And since they are different is this a, strange, way of saying there is no stacking?
| Night_Shade |
Jbadams - The blood rager chooses a blood-line, where does it come from??? The only ones written were for the sorcerer. He chooses a bloodline that falls under the sorcererous heading and has those abilities at a slightly lower progression. What I mean by different would be that at 1st level a sorcerer with the draconic blood lines gets a claw attack and a the first bloodline power for a Blood rager would be "Immunity to magic sleep effects and paralysis effects"
The second blood-line power for the sorcerer would be Dragon resistance at 3rd, for the Bloodrager it could be "Frightful Presence" In this instance I would agree with everybody that the blood-rager draconic blood-line would not be the same as the sorcerers draconic blood-line because they are written up as different blood-lines, but to say that they both use the same blood-line, but advance slower so pretend it is not the same is a bit lazy. If it were not meant to be the same (that is to treat blood-lines as blood-lines regardless of how one is benefiting from it) then the write-up of one blood-line should be different enough from the oher so that there is an ability difference (as well as a when aquired difference if any are similar).
Kestral, was not saying both would go up, just one :-)
| TGMaxMaxer |
This part...
If the bloodrager takes levels in another class that grants a bloodline, the bloodlines must be the same type, even if that means that the bloodline of one of the classes must change. Subject to GM discretion, the bloodrager can change his former bloodline to make them conform.
Indicates that they are intended to be seen as the same bloodline, which happens to manifest differently based on the class it comes from.
However, it would definitely be better to have them come out and say it. When the ACG classes couldn't multiclass with their parent classes, this would not have come up, but now it matters, and especially for the single prestige class that was written before there was any way to get a bloodline besides sorcerer.
| kestral287 |
Jbadams - The blood rager chooses a blood-line, where does it come from??? The only ones written were for the sorcerer.
There are bloodlines written for the Bloodrager. He takes those. Some are close to their Sorcerer version, some are wildly different, some do not even have Sorcerer analogues.
You keep repeating this mantra of "the only bloodlines are for the Sorcerer". This mantra is completely and totally wrong.
Even Draconic is not the same. All powers have at least minor differences, but in particular note how Sorcerers do not get Dragon Form, or anything even remotely like it.
| Night_Shade |
Kestral - theonly blood-lines that ahve been written up have always been geared towards the sorcerer (as they were the ony class to benefit from them) now that the bloodrager exist, there are no bloddlines written up for a bloodrager, they are to use the ones that have always existed (that belong to the sorcerer and most think it is a sorcerer exclusive ability).
So if there are bloodlines written for the bloodrager, that are not the ones that existed for the sorcerer I would like to be shown so that I am better informed, but to say they can use the sorcerer's bloodline as there bloodline is not the same as saying they have there own bloodline write up.
Just in case I am also of the belief that bloodline should be an ability that manifest itself in certain individuals (regardless of class, currently sorcerer and bloodrager) and work as stated in the blood-line write up. That is to say that the power of the angels, or demons, or dragon flows thru your vains and stop right there, not to say that the power of the angels, and demons, and dragons flows thru your vains, but it is different if yo uare a sorcerer or a blood rager. The class will describe when (and if) you attain an ability.
A dragon looking over a sorcerer and a bloodragers
"The force is strong within you, yung padawan."
:-)
| kestral287 |
There are bloodlines that are written exclusively for the Bloodrager, that only the Bloodrager can access (okay, Raging Blood is a mini-Eldritch Heritage for the first level power), that are totally and completely distinct from the Sorcerer bloodlines.
Some, such as Draconic, share many powers-- but they are different bloodlines, with different takes on the powers that they do have, and of course each Bloodrager bloodline is six powers to the Sorcerer's five.
But to compare:
Sorcerer-Abyssal:
1: Claws (3/day+Cha, scale to 1D6, Flaming, overcome Magic DR)
3: Demon Resistances (Resist Electricity & poison)
9: Strength of the Abyss (Inherent strength bonus, scales to +6)
15: Added Summons (one extra summon when summoning demons)
20: Demonic Might (Electricity/Poison immunity, Telepathy, elemental resistances).
Bloodrager-Abyssal
1: Claws (active during bloodrage, scale to 1d8, Flaming, overcome Magic DR)
4: Demonic Bulk (grow one size during a bloodrage)
8: Demon Resistances (resist Acid/Cold/Fire 5)
12: Abyssal Bloodrage (Str bonus from rage increases; AC penalty increases)
16: Demonic Aura (Aura of fire during a bloodrage; deals 2D6+Con)
20: Demonic Immunities (Immune to electricity & poison, even when not bloodraging).
These are totally different. Even the abilities with the same names are not the same (Demon Resistances is very different, Claws is more subtle but still distinct), several abilities are different entirely, and the Bloodrager has six abilities instead of five.
So yeah. Bloodragers have their own bloodlines. They are not Sorcerer bloodlines. Sorcerers cannot take Bloodrager lines or vice versa.
| jbadams |
Kestral - theonly blood-lines that ahve been written up have always been geared towards the sorcerer (as they were the ony class to benefit from them) now that the bloodrager exist, there are no bloddlines written up for a bloodrager
Sorry, but what we have been saying repeatedly is that this is outright incorrect: check the PRD entry for Bloodrager - you'll find a set of Bloodrager specific bloodlines, some of which are quite similar to Sorcerer bloodlines but many of which vary wildly, and none of which are exactly the same as equivalent Sorcerer bloodlines.
Bloodragers take Bloodrager bloodlines.
Sorcerers take Sorcerer bloodlines.
For what it's worth, there are also some other class archetypes that take bloodlines and they specifically call out whether they choose from Sorcerer or Bloodrager bloodlines.
Blood Arcanist (Arcanist archetype) chooses a Sorcerer bloodline.
Eldritch Scion (Magus archetype) chooses a Bloodrager bloodline.
I feel like I've seen other examples, but they don't currently spring to mind; those two however do provide another clear illustration of the fact that Sorcerer and Bloodrager bloodlines are separate class features selected from separate lists.
| jbadams |
Here you go - the PRD entry for Hybrid Classes states:
Each one of the following classes lists two classes that it draws upon to form the basis of its theme. While a character can multiclass with these parent classes, this usually results in redundant abilities. Such abilities don't stack unless specified.
...and the Bloodline class feature for Bloodragers does not specify that it stacks with a Sorcerer bloodline (or vice versa), so there you have it straight from the actual rules; it's two separate (but matching) Bloodlines that do not stack.
(Sorry for double posting, I'm on mobile and it's a bit awkward to find references and format posts.)