>> Ask *Rysky* anything, anything at all! <<


Off-Topic Discussions

4,951 to 5,000 of 5,365 << first < prev | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | next > last >>
Silver Crusade

Lord Fyre wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Vidmaster7 wrote:
Maybe women in fantasy have better dex so they don't want those armor penalties? Hmm I got it. Bikini's give Charisma bonus to AC!
No that’s a Succubi thing.

Not necessarily.

Isn't all the armor for women cut like that?

1) Rude!

2) No, but i like that outcome.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Hello, everyone.

Silver Crusade

Hey John :3


Hi, Rysky. What's up?

Silver Crusade

Nothing much, just starting the week, how about you?


Nothing much here, either. Just another boring Monday.

Silver Crusade

Heh, same.


At least today isn't the same as the Fifth of July. That Friday, someone ( I'm assuming a self-entitled college kid that decided that he didn't want to pay ) "popped" the gate arm of one of the exits. To the point that he nearly tore the arm completely off. *Sigh* People.

Silver Crusade

No reason to assume, it could have been a professor :3

Hopefully it royally screwed up their vehicle.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

One can always hope.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

My relief is here. Clocking out and going home. Have a good day, everyone.

Silver Crusade

Ni-ni John ^w^

RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

Are you aware that "this path" leads to "Chainmail Bikinis"?

Silver Crusade

Lord Fyre wrote:
Are you aware that "this path" leads to "Chainmail Bikinis"?

It does not.

RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

Rysky wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Are you aware that "this path" leads to "Chainmail Bikinis"?
It does not.

Ah but it can.

Whimsy - playfully quaint or fanciful behavior or humor.

So the point is, once you start when does it stop? Who gets to police that?

Silver Crusade

Lord Fyre wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Are you aware that "this path" leads to "Chainmail Bikinis"?
It does not.

Ah but it can.

Whimsy - playfully quaint or fanciful behavior or humor.

So the point is, once you start when does it stop? Who gets to police that?

I don’t consider chainmail bikinis whimsical.

Also I don’t see what it has to do with giving slingshots to Gnomes.

RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

Rysky wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Are you aware that "this path" leads to "Chainmail Bikinis"?
It does not.

Ah but it can.

Whimsy - playfully quaint or fanciful behavior or humor.

So the point is, once you start when does it stop? Who gets to police that?

I don’t consider chainmail bikinis whimsical.

Also I don’t see what it has to do with giving slingshots to Gnomes.

It comes down to what the person doing the writing/artwork/game development considers appropriate. That is the relation.

James Jacobs considers both to be silly things that don't belong in Pathfinder.

That said ...


1 person marked this as a favorite.

WAHOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!

*runs around doing a combination of Snoopy dance and Kermit arm flail*

GREMLINS ARE IN! GREMLINS ARE IN! GREMLINS ARE IN!!!!!

<3 <3 <3 <3

Silver Crusade

Lord Fyre wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Are you aware that "this path" leads to "Chainmail Bikinis"?
It does not.

Ah but it can.

Whimsy - playfully quaint or fanciful behavior or humor.

So the point is, once you start when does it stop? Who gets to police that?

I don’t consider chainmail bikinis whimsical.

Also I don’t see what it has to do with giving slingshots to Gnomes.

It comes down to what the person doing the writing/artwork/game development considers appropriate. That is the relation.

James Jacobs considers both to be silly things that don't belong in Pathfinder.

That said ...

... okay?

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Master Pugwampi wrote:

WAHOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!

*runs around doing a combination of Snoopy dance and Kermit arm flail*

GREMLINS ARE IN! GREMLINS ARE IN! GREMLINS ARE IN!!!!!

<3 <3 <3 <3

Yay Wumpums! *cuddles*

RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

Rysky wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Are you aware that "this path" leads to "Chainmail Bikinis"?
It does not.

Ah but it can.

Whimsy - playfully quaint or fanciful behavior or humor.

So the point is, once you start when does it stop? Who gets to police that?

I don’t consider chainmail bikinis whimsical.

Also I don’t see what it has to do with giving slingshots to Gnomes.

It comes down to what the person doing the writing/artwork/game development considers appropriate. That is the relation.

James Jacobs considers both to be silly things that don't belong in Pathfinder.

That said ...

... okay?

In effect. James Jacobs considers slingshots silly, and thus they are not part of Golarion (or Pathfinder).

In reality, slingshots are dangerous weapons. In a Fantasy setting there is no reason that they wouldn't be used by a race such as Gnomes.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I agree. Slingshots can kill. A small stone can have the same velocity as a rifle bullet.

RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

2 people marked this as a favorite.
John Napier 698 wrote:
I agree. Slingshots can kill. A small stone can have the same velocity as a rifle bullet.

They are actually banned in 17 U.S. States. :)

There is no reason to treat them any differently then the sling for combat stats.


33 dead at Kyoto Animation Arson

Silver Crusade

Lord Fyre wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Are you aware that "this path" leads to "Chainmail Bikinis"?
It does not.

Ah but it can.

Whimsy - playfully quaint or fanciful behavior or humor.

So the point is, once you start when does it stop? Who gets to police that?

I don’t consider chainmail bikinis whimsical.

Also I don’t see what it has to do with giving slingshots to Gnomes.

It comes down to what the person doing the writing/artwork/game development considers appropriate. That is the relation.

James Jacobs considers both to be silly things that don't belong in Pathfinder.

That said ...

... okay?

In effect. James Jacobs considers slingshots silly, and thus they are not part of Golarion (or Pathfinder).

In reality, slingshots are dangerous weapons. In a Fantasy setting there is no reason that they wouldn't be used by a race such as Gnomes.

That was my thought process too.

That said, slingshots and bikini armors are the complete opposites that have nothing to do with each other.

Silver Crusade

John Napier 698 wrote:
33 dead at Kyoto Animation Arson

I saw, John.

I saw.

RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

Rysky wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Are you aware that "this path" leads to "Chainmail Bikinis"?
It does not.

Ah but it can.

Whimsy - playfully quaint or fanciful behavior or humor.

So the point is, once you start when does it stop? Who gets to police that?

I don’t consider chainmail bikinis whimsical.

Also I don’t see what it has to do with giving slingshots to Gnomes.

It comes down to what the person doing the writing/artwork/game development considers appropriate. That is the relation.

James Jacobs considers both to be silly things that don't belong in Pathfinder.

That said ...

... okay?

In effect. James Jacobs considers slingshots silly, and thus they are not part of Golarion (or Pathfinder).

In reality, slingshots are dangerous weapons. In a Fantasy setting there is no reason that they wouldn't be used by a race such as Gnomes.

That was my thought process too.

That said, slingshots and bikini armors are the complete opposites that have nothing to do with each other.

Except if one classifies both as silly, as James Jacobs apparently has done.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Lord Fyre wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Are you aware that "this path" leads to "Chainmail Bikinis"?
It does not.

Ah but it can.

Whimsy - playfully quaint or fanciful behavior or humor.

So the point is, once you start when does it stop? Who gets to police that?

I don’t consider chainmail bikinis whimsical.

Also I don’t see what it has to do with giving slingshots to Gnomes.

It comes down to what the person doing the writing/artwork/game development considers appropriate. That is the relation.

James Jacobs considers both to be silly things that don't belong in Pathfinder.

That said ...

... okay?

In effect. James Jacobs considers slingshots silly, and thus they are not part of Golarion (or Pathfinder).

In reality, slingshots are dangerous weapons. In a Fantasy setting there is no reason that they wouldn't be used by a race such as Gnomes.

That was my thought process too.

That said, slingshots and bikini armors are the complete opposites that have nothing to do with each other.

Except if one classifies both as silly, as James Jacobs apparently has done.

They're both classified as phyiscal objects as well, which means nada.

People think slingshots are silly because they're associated with kids when in fact they are deadly, bikini armor is silly because it is, it doesn't work, would not provide armor, and would get the wearer killed. So the opposite.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Greeting Glorious and Stern Mistress Rysky...

How are you doing?

In my thread you mentioned web fiction leading up to 2nd ed....has Chris Jackson written one yet?

A note on Chainmail Bikini: It is silly to expect protection from them...but there have been groups of warriors who have fought naked before...one of them made the Romans retreat and build a wall...so a high DeX based fighter who want to wear that...or a chain loincloth I have no issue with...it when they expect to get a arnor bonus for it that I have issues and it becomes silly...

Jacob has very strong opinions on what is silly...so much so he is starting to turn me off...

Silver Crusade

Selene Spires wrote:

Greeting Glorious and Stern Mistress Rysky...

How are you doing?

In my thread you mentioned web fiction leading up to 2nd ed....has Chris Jackson written one yet?

A note on Chainmail Bikini: It is silly to expect protection from them...but there have been groups of warriors who have fought naked before...one of them made the Romans retreat and build a wall...so a high DeX based fighter who want to wear that...or a chain loincloth I have no issue with...it when they expect to get a arnor bonus for it that I have issues and it becomes silly...

Jacob has very strong opinions on what is silly...so much so he is starting to turn me off...

Greetings lovely pet ^w^

Okay i suppose, did you have a good vacation?

Yes he has!

Same. Leaving it as cheesecake clothing is still eh to me but still being clothing it’s not much of an issue.

I’m sorry to hear that, he’s always been rather serious about a lot of things.

RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

Selene Spires wrote:

A note on Chainmail Bikini: It is silly to expect protection from them...but there have been groups of warriors who have fought naked before...one of them made the Romans retreat and build a wall...so a high DeX based fighter who want to wear that...or a chain loincloth I have no issue with...it when they expect to get a arnor bonus for it that I have issues and it becomes silly...

Jacob has very strong opinions on what is silly...so much so he is starting to turn me off...

James Jacobs - as Creative Director - is forced to decide what is and is not appropriate for the Pathfinder game as a whole.

The thing is, every table is different. And, Mr. Jacobs recognizes that.

For example, I do allow Chainmail Bikinis to give the same protection as the armor they are based on - b.t.w., half my playing group is female. Why yes, I do reduce the weight and Armor Check Penalty. Oviously, at Rysky's table that would not fly.

That is a "house rule." Slingshots can also be a house rule.

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Correct.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Oooo oooo ooooooo! Mistress! Oooo! Gnollies!

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Hunt, the PugWumpus wrote:
Oooo oooo ooooooo! Mistress! Oooo! Gnollies!

FLUFFIES!!!


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Got my 2E books today, and my god, it's full of stars...

Changelings join the parade of "they can have guys, too," vampires no longer have that weird wargamy energy drain via "slams," the layout of the core book allows for quick and dirty character generation... after a long life as a curmudgeonly grognard, it's sort of weird to be legit convinced that the new edition is simply better. Might not have as many modular options yet, but it's so, so lovely...

So, the question:

What do you hope for in 2nd edition?

Silver Crusade

Woohoo!

And hmm, I dunno, fun ways to build characters and cool monsters?

RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

(Actually, this question is for Rysky the Dark Solarion)

Have you found the lack of Player's Guides to be a problem in Starfinder? It's been some time, your answer might have changed.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Yes, that was a major turn off for the Starfinder APs, the inclusion of which could have helped with some otherwise rough transition to Starfinder from Pathfinder.

RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Rysky the Dark Solarion wrote:
Yes, that was a major turn off for the Starfinder APs, the inclusion of which could have helped with some otherwise rough transition to Starfinder from Pathfinder.

It need not even have been very long (two pages might have been enough) as a downloadable PDF enhancement to the AP, much like what was put into the intro of Against the Aeon Throne.

  • * - A brief "pitch" introducing the AP to the players.
  • * - Some guidance on character creation, as well as caveats to avoid. (Such as reminding the players that Eox is a Pact World member in good standing being one infamous example.)
  • * - some notes on what where the heroes start the adventure (or at least where they think they start the adventure). For example, In Against the Aeon Throne the heroes start as the crew of a tramp freighter delivering supplies to Nakondis, a world in the Vast. Players might find that information useful for forming character concepts and party relationships.
  • * - Relating the Core Rulebook's themes (as well as the bonus theme, if any) to the story of the AP.
That's all that would be required.

So far some of the APs have also included a new theme, usually in the back of Book 1. This would have been better placed in a Player's Guide to make it more known to the player group.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Lord Fyre wrote:
  • * - Some guidance on character creation, as well as caveats to avoid. (Such as reminding the players that Eox is a Pact World member in good standing being one infamous example.)
  • Those are all good but this is the main one for me.

    Instead of saying all options (and Deities) are valid but have Undead not be inherently Evil but then also not updating Pharasma, Iomedae, and Sarenrae from Pathfinder...

    RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

    Rysky the Dark Solarion wrote:
    Lord Fyre wrote:
  • * - Some guidance on character creation, as well as caveats to avoid. (Such as reminding the players that Eox is a Pact World member in good standing being one infamous example.)
  • Those are all good but this is the main one for me.

    Instead of saying all options (and Deities) are valid but have Undead not be inherently Evil but then also not updating Pharasma, Iomedae, and Sarenrae from Pathfinder...

    ... and failing to deal (in any way) with the resulting tensions that conflict could create?


    Lord Fyre wrote:
    Rysky the Dark Solarion wrote:
    Lord Fyre wrote:
  • * - Some guidance on character creation, as well as caveats to avoid. (Such as reminding the players that Eox is a Pact World member in good standing being one infamous example.)
  • Those are all good but this is the main one for me.

    Instead of saying all options (and Deities) are valid but have Undead not be inherently Evil but then also not updating Pharasma, Iomedae, and Sarenrae from Pathfinder...

    ... and failing to deal (in any way) with the resulting tensions that conflict could create?

    Yeah...

    RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

    Do you have your PF2 books yet?

    (I do not, because I will have them waiting for me at my FLGS.)

    Silver Crusade

    Lord Fyre wrote:

    Do you have your PF2 books yet?

    (I do not, because I will have them waiting for me at my FLGS.)

    I do.


    1 person marked this as a favorite.

    You being a demon and all is their some kind of deal we can make to get my books to me faster? Or wait it's probably a devil I need isn't it?

    Silver Crusade

    Vidmaster7 wrote:
    You being a demon and all is their some kind of deal we can make to get my books to me faster? Or wait it's probably a devil I need isn't it?

    Well we could plot something but by the time we implemented it your books would probably already have arrived.


    1 person marked this as a favorite.

    That is probably true.

    RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

    Are you still eating Pugwumpis?

    Silver Crusade

    In a manner of speaking.


    2 people marked this as a favorite.
    Rysky wrote:
    In a manner of speaking.

    Technically, Rysky prefers pugwampi flavored caramel. All that is required to make this is a cauldron, gullible pugwampis, brown sugar, and a heat source. The pugwampis usually survive, but end up with mass amounts of sticky caramel in their fur. The caramel is thus suitably "flavored."

    As an aside, why do you want pugwampi flavored caramel? I never actually asked.

    4,951 to 5,000 of 5,365 << first < prev | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | next > last >>
    Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Off-Topic Discussions / >> Ask *Rysky* anything, anything at all! << All Messageboards

    Want to post a reply? Sign in.