Demon Bane vs Evil outsider Bane


Rules Questions

Liberty's Edge

Ok so... running wrath of the righteous and ran across this little oddity
in book one, they run into an evil outsider bane long sword

in book two they run into a demon bane great axe (optional weapon fiendsplitter found by fighting a vrock)

the rules for bane..are a bit confusing, and one of the two should not be doable.

So when the say pick a subtype of outsider for bane, do we use the outsider subtypes in the monster manuals

or... do we pick a sub type like we would for a ranger

or is it either.. in which case why would you ever build something that is only demon bane.

looking forward to the answer on this one. maybe one is a misprint/ error.


Bane says that you can pick a subtype for Outsiders. Demon and Evil are both subtypes so both are rules legal though one is clearly inferior to the other from a "I want to kill evil" perspective. Published adventurers and even the rule books are filled with examples of suboptimal but "flavorful" items; the axe your players found would just seem to be one of them. As to why someone would make such a weapon from an in-universe perspective, perhaps it was devil made? Devils and demons fight all the time and they certainly wouldn't want any of their captured weapons to be useful against themselves.


Pretty sure it's supposed to be a specific subtype, otherwise it makes bane way better than it's supposed to be. Demon-bane would be legit, evil outsider-bane shouldn't be.


Nope, evil is a subtype.
That's how it works.

I don't think demon is even an "outsider" type, technically.

Edit: it is a subtype of outsider, my bad.


Both are legal subtypes of Outsider.

The difference between this and the Human/Humanoid is that both Evil and Demon are analogous to Human: Outsider is a type, as is Humanoid, so you'd pick a subtype. Evil is a legal subtype of Outsider, in exactly the same way that Human is a legal subtype of Humanoid.

Demon Bane weapons should, in theory, be obnoxiously rare: you use them when you only want the wielder going after Demons, not Devils or others. So a Devil might make one, as an example, if he wants its wielder to attack Demons but doesn't want to run the risk of the blade being turned on him. Alternately, somebody is just stupid.

But anyone intelligent should almost always go for an alignment-outsider-bane over a specific subtype, with the sole exceptions being targeting True Neutral Outsiders and an Outsider of one alignment targeting the same-- if the non-shared alignment is neutral (I.E., a LG Outsider going after an LN Outsider, but not an LE Outsider since then they'd use Evil Outsider Bane).

Liberty's Edge

thanks all, makes sense, rule wise, but still dont know why they would have a minor artifact be demon bane only (scratches head)


Because it was made by devils?


Without being familiar with the item, I'd say its reflecting the item's special purpose, and possibly its makers.

For example, I'd expect a Hellknight forged bane weapon to be Chaotic Outsider or Demon Bane, rather than Evil Outsider Bane.

And a really amusing ramification - the demon bane weapon still works on demons who've reformed enough to lose their [Evil] descriptor.

It's also worth noting that not all evil outsiders are actually [Evil] subtype. Evil Outsider Bane isn't worth squat against rakshasa or onis.


Pathfinder Maps, Starfinder Maps, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Zhangar wrote:
And a really amusing ramification - the demon bane weapon still works on demons who've reformed enough to lose their [Evil] descriptor.

As I understand it, the above is not true. You can have a LG (alignment) and an [evil] subtype. Changing the alignment doesn't change the subtype since your body is made of evil stuff. You wouldn't get rid of the Evil subtype.

Grand Lodge

Thematics are important. A sword that says "Aspis Consortium Bane" tells you a lot about the person who made it.

Shadow Lodge

Evil Subtype wrote:
This subtype is usually applied to outsiders native to the evil-aligned outer planes. Evil outsiders are also called fiends. Most creatures that have this subtype also have evil alignments; however, if their alignments change, they still retain the subtype. Any effect that depends on alignment affects a creature with this subtype as if the creature has an evil alignment, no matter what its alignment actually is. The creature also suffers effects according to its actual alignment. A creature with the evil subtype overcomes damage reduction as if its natural weapons and any weapons it wields are evil-aligned (see Damage Reduction, page 299).

Grand Lodge

Weirdo wrote:
Evil Subtype wrote:
This subtype is usually applied to outsiders native to the evil-aligned outer planes. Evil outsiders are also called fiends. Most creatures that have this subtype also have evil alignments; however, if their alignments change, they still retain the subtype. Any effect that depends on alignment affects a creature with this subtype as if the creature has an evil alignment, no matter what its alignment actually is. The creature also suffers effects according to its actual alignment. A creature with the evil subtype overcomes damage reduction as if its natural weapons and any weapons it wields are evil-aligned (see Damage Reduction, page 299).

Yes, that means the Succubus Paladin can be detected and smote both ways.


BretI wrote:
Zhangar wrote:
And a really amusing ramification - the demon bane weapon still works on demons who've reformed enough to lose their [Evil] descriptor.
As I understand it, the above is not true. You can have a LG (alignment) and an [evil] subtype. Changing the alignment doesn't change the subtype since your body is made of evil stuff. You wouldn't get rid of the Evil subtype.

That is not how things actually worked for the one redeemed demon in Pathfinder that I'm aware of.

Wrath of the Righteous spoiler:
Arueshalae is a succubus in the process of being redeemed when the PCs meet her in Demon's Heresy, the third book of Wrath of the Righteous. When they meet her, she is a CN Outsider (chaotic, demon, extraplanar). When she finishes her redemption, she becomes a CG Outsider (chaotic, good, demon, extraplanar).

I'm aware that WotC published a redeemed succubus paladin that used a different way of doing things, but that was 3.5 and this is Pathfinder.

Sczarni

While some outsiders are Evil by nature, I honestly do believe that Evil is not subtype required for Bane Weapon Enhancement. Here is quick note what Bane says:

Bane Weapon Enhancement wrote:


A bane weapon excels against certain foes. Against a designated foe, the weapon's enhancement bonus is +2 better than its actual bonus. It also deals an extra 2d6 points of damage against such foes. To randomly determine a weapon's designated foe, roll on the following table.
d% Designated Foe
01—05 Aberrations
06—09 Animals
10—16 Constructs
17—22 Dragons
23—27 Fey
28—60 Humanoids (pick one subtype)
61—65 Magical beasts
66—70 Monstrous humanoids
71—72 Oozes
73—88 Outsiders (pick one subtype)
89—90 Plants
91—98 Undead
99—100 Vermin

It would imply that you use outsider subtype not alignment subtype. It seems pretty clear cut to me. It's not too uncommon to find printed mistakes in paizo books.


Quote:
It would imply that you use outsider subtype not alignment subtype. It seems pretty clear cut to me. It's not too uncommon to find printed mistakes in paizo books.

[Evil] is an outsider subtype. Its description even says so. It is a valid choice for a Bane weapon (and slaying arrows, which also work with creature types\subtypes).

Quote:
This subtype is usually applied to outsiders native to the evil-aligned outer planes.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I don't think anyone's pointed out yet this FAQ, which confirms that outsider (evil) is a valid choice for a Bane weapon.

FAQ wrote:
If you have multiple bane effects on a weapon and attack a creature against which more than one bane applies (such as a chaotic- and evil-outsider bane weapon used against a demon), the effects do not stack: the weapon's enhancement bonus is only +2 higher than its actual enhancement bonus, and it only deals +2d6 points of damage against that opponent.
FractalLaw wrote:

That is not how things actually worked for the one redeemed demon in Pathfinder that I'm aware of.

** spoiler omitted **

I'm aware that WotC published a redeemed succubus paladin that used a different way of doing things, but that was 3.5 and this is Pathfinder.

The stated rule in the PF Bestiary (page 311-312) is as quoted above: Most creatures that have this subtype also have evil alignments; however, if their alignments change, they still retain the subtype.

The writers of Wrath of the Righteous may have been in error, or they may have decided that the particular circumstances of that redemption merited special treatment.

LazarX wrote:
Thematics are important. A sword that says "Aspis Consortium Bane" tells you a lot about the person who made it.

True. You could also add some thematics to the creation of such weapons that would support more specific bane subtypes. For example, creating a bane weapon might require materials taken from the creature it is intended to be effective against, such as blood or bone. If you use only demon blood or bone, you get a demonbane weapon - the more general bane effect requires using blood from devils and daemons as well. In areas such as the Worldwound where demons are plentiful, it'll be easier to make a demonbane weapon than an evil outsider bane weapon, and the former will be generally as valuable because when will you be fighting devils?

Alternatively, spontaneous enhancement of significant items might lead to demonbane swords. A powerful paladin fell defending a church and those huddled within from a demon army; thereafter the sword was found to be particularly potent against demons. The firstborn child of a particular noble house is sworn to hunt the demon that cursed their lands; over generations their heirloom sword has come to share their thirst for demon blood.

Sczarni

Doesn't really make too much sense to me, but thanks for linking FAQ Wierdo. It seems to be legal choice to take.


@ Weirdo: The NPC in Wrath of the Righteous losing her [Evil] subtype is specifically called out in her stat block, under her special abilities. So intentional exception by the author.

She's who I was thinking of, actually.

Mild Spoiler:
Though something's gone horribly, horribly wrong if the party's taking a demon bane weapon to her, since rescuing that sufficiently reformed demon is an actual adventure goal.

@ Malag - the alignment descriptors for outsiders actually have more to due with plane of origin than with alignment itself.

(Random aside: Considering that Kytons hail from the Plane of Shadow, Kytons getting the lawful and evil subtypes actually makes their whole race an exception to the normal outsider subtype rules. Though I suppose they originally came from Hell...)

Community Manager

Duplicate thread, please go here.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Demon Bane vs Evil outsider Bane All Messageboards
Recent threads in Rules Questions