
swoosh |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Yes, it would. Spellcasters would feel less unique.
Then we could give spellcasters bad will saves. A man who spends most of his childhood and adult life cloistered in dark towers, pouring over ancient tomes and giving himself fully to eldritch and arcane powers, placing his peers between himself and danger sounds like the perfect candidate for a craven demeanor.

Green Smashomancer |

Wouldn't a Paladin be much more appropriate for this situation?
With a sword and shield? He would lose access to Lay on Hands.
But on topic, nope. Something tells me that someone with no magical/psionic/supernatural capability choosing to stand toe-to-toe with powerful creatures of yore should not be weak willed.

Issac Daneil |

It's funny, because I always imagined that classes that follow codes ought to have higher wills, because they are used to denying urges, on the path to success.
Arguably, anyone who must combat compelling urges from within would also fall into this catagory; (Sorcerers?)
Of course, that would mean Wizards get no good saves...oh well!

Issac Daneil |

But on topic, nope. Something tells me that someone with no magical/psionic/supernatural capability choosing to stand toe-to-toe with powerful creatures of yore should not be weak willed.
I've got to agree with you. It somehow feels especially heroic; we're not even sure if the above mentioned fighter is thinking 'And when I die, I'll go to heaven.'. For we know, this could be a chaotic evil fighter performing his one good act before death, and thinking 'I guess they Abyss just couldn't wait for me..."

Green Smashomancer |

One point of AC is a worthy price to pay for getting off the free hand trick. I've tried it in practice during Larps. It makes sense physically.
Not sure if you're agreeing with me, let me clarify: I do think a Paladin with a x-and-shield should be able to use LoH. It's just by pure RAW it doesn't work. Which feels off to me. Like Fighters having a bad will save.

Issac Daneil |

Well; what I understand is that a light shield allows you to carry things, but not wield weapons, so the claim is you can pass the sword into your light shield, use your ability, then pass it back into your main hand (a free action series)
I'm glad we both think it SHOULD be allowed, regardless of what FAQs may say; more enabling to the weapon-burdened!

Green Smashomancer |

Well; what I understand is that a light shield allows you to carry things, but not wield weapons, so the claim is you can pass the sword into your light shield, use your ability, then pass it back into your main hand (a free action series)
I'm glad we both think it SHOULD be allowed, regardless of what FAQs may say; more enabling to the weapon-burdened!
ECH, why with the weirdness, light shield? I will say that I was thinking heavy shield though.

anlashok |
LoneKnave wrote:Or a better class. Like a caster, they all get good will saves.Congratulations, you just gave up your fortitude save.
I am sure most wizards would be happy to concede a strong will save to fighters if they could add fortitude as a strong save to their class.
Really? I can't think of anyone who'd trade away a good will save for a good fort save. Especially when a wizard can afford to pump con harder than a fighter can afford to pump wis.
Will is easily the most important save since so many of the nastiest effects are tied to it... and that's why martials tend to have bad will saves.

![]() |

Artanthos wrote:LoneKnave wrote:Or a better class. Like a caster, they all get good will saves.Congratulations, you just gave up your fortitude save.
I am sure most wizards would be happy to concede a strong will save to fighters if they could add fortitude as a strong save to their class.
Really? I can't think of anyone who'd trade away a good will save for a good fort save. Especially when a wizard can afford to pump con harder than a fighter can afford to pump wis.
Will is easily the most important save since so many of the nastiest effects are tied to it... and that's why martials tend to have bad will saves.
I believe I used the word ADD.

LoneKnave |
Really?LoneKnave wrote:Or a better class. Like a caster, they all get good will saves.Congratulations, you just gave up your fortitude save.
I am sure most wizards would be happy to concede a strong will save to fighters if they could add fortitude as a strong save to their class.
Are you sure?
I'm not entirely.
In fact, I'm pretty sure I don't.