| Joe Shmoe 741 |
I've been thinking about this a lot lately, and I've realised that, going off of what's presented in the Books of the Damned, the daemons should have been wiped out a long time ago. Here's why:
First of all, everybody wants them dead. The demons, the devils, the empyreal lords, pretty much every body wants the daemons gone. Now, that in and of itself wouldn't necessarily damn the species to extinction (we could say similar things about the demons after all) but it will be important once we examine point two.
Secondly, and more importantly, the daemons are the weakest faction of the various archfiends. Think about it--according to their own faction book, each of the Horsemen is about en paar with a demon lord, archdevil, or empyreal lord. Each harbinger is of similar power to a nascent demon lord or infernal duke. This means there's a massive power disparity. There are eight archdevils, not counting Asmodeus (a god). There are countless demon lords, not counting Lamashtu (a god). There are many, many empyreal lords, not counting Sarenrae (again, a god). There are only four archdaemons, and they don't have a god in their corner (at least not since the Oinodaemon was bound).
With that in mind, how am I supposed to believe that Abbadon was able to resist Lamashtu's invasion, or any of the other incursions they've suffered. The daemons are so much weaker in terms of the power they have available to them, that there's no believable way they could have lasted this long. They are outnumbered and outgunned by Heaven, Hell, and the Abyss.
While we're on the subject, why was it decided that the daemons should be so much weaker? I get that the Horsemen of the Apocalypse theme is cool, but only four archdaemons? In all of Abbadon there's only four daemons who can stand up to a demon lord, archdevil, or empyreal lord? I find that hard to believe. It seems silly to make one faction so much lesser than the rest.
When I run a campaign, I'm going to have to alter the rules somewhat. I'll likely make the Four equal to or just slightly lesser than the actual gods in terms of power, and the harbingers the equivalents of demon lords/archdevils/et al. It seems to be the only way to bring some balance in, and present the daemons as an actual threatening faction.
Thoughts?
| Buri |
| 5 people marked this as a favorite. |
Keep in mind the 5th horseman, the first one, utters things that even frighten horseman of the apocalypse. I'm sure a few secrets have been uttered along the way that have helped ensure some sort of continued existence.
As far as everyone ganging up on the daemons only Rovagug every got that honor and he's not even dead. The demons are too concerned about infighting. Devils are all about their long term schemes. If it ever become a prudent thing for them to do it would probably be done. The empyreal lords are more concerned about multiverse huge events. A single race whose members individually and occasionally cause havoc on the material plane doesn't fit the bill.
Keep in mind that daemons are the souls of particularly vile mortals alone. There is no corrupting influence of the abyss on them. No weird damnation by hell created them. They're literally the refuse of creation. In a way, that lets them slip past a few cracks and be largely unnoticed as their souls never were consigned to another fate. They're literally all mortals who just wanted to watch the world burn. No one helped them do it. They were the people who killed kids for fun and the like and not because some demon corrupted them into it or as part of some bargain with a devil for power/wealth/fame.
They're the bastards of the cosmos.
Rysky
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
They're not actually on that bad of terms with Devils and In the Midnight Isles the Thanadaemon actually patrol Nocticula's city's waterways.
Also note that although the Four are demigods, on par with Demon Lords, that there is a lot of stretch in that term. Case in point being that while the Four are "comparable" to Demon Lords it's pretty safe to say they're vastly more powerful than most of the Demon Lords.
I may be wrong on this but I believe it is just Lamashtu that is currently "at war" with them. And she of all creatures would know of the dangers of attacking creatures of "only" Demigod power.
Lord Gadigan
|
While I don't disagree that they're at a disadvantage in a lot of ways, I'll note that they do have two gods in their corner: Urgathoa and Zyphus. They specifically don't mess with souls that are going to those two and let them have a large chunk of Abaddon so that there's a couple daemon-friendly gods around to discourage large-scale attacks on Abaddon.
| Xanzal |
| 4 people marked this as a favorite. |
Why do the daemons still exist? Why do the devils still exist? They seek to enslave and corrupt all of existance. Why do the demons still exist, who enjoy destruction and chaos? Or for that matter, the Qlippoth? Because they aren't a problem. Yet.
It's quite possible that one day, they may be destroyed. Although considering their nature, I don't find that likely. Also keep in mind that they are neutral evil. So, while the devils are beholden to their order and law, and the demons are slaves to their destructive desires, daemons are adaptable. They can use any tactic, any strategy, with little to no issue. They could be considered 'Pragmatic Evil', instead of 'Netural Evil'.
Another take on it is that they're almighty janitors of the Pathfinder Universe. If I remember correctly, Charon has outright stated to Pharasma 'You know how this will end.' It was after this that she opened the portal to Abaddon for souls to be judged. Maybe they're simply the last ones out of the universe. The creatures that will stack the chairs, turn out the lights, and lock the doors, if you will. As long as there are mortals to make them, they will exist.
Your mileage may vary, of course, but the daemons are my favorite kind of fiend.
| Joe Shmoe 741 |
@Squeakman
Not denying that Lamashtu called off that war, only that there's no apparent reason why she should have to. Given that she's a fully fledged god, all she would need is one or two other demon lords on her side to tilt the conflict firmly in her favour (and given that a number of demon lords are explicitly referenced as being her allies I struggle to accept that she didn't bring a few of them along).
@Buri
I'm not claiming everyone would have to gang up on them. Any one of those factions--the demons, the devils, the empyreal lords--should be able to beat them, hands down. I honestly don't understand how they were able to fend off Lamashtu's invasion; that really should have been the end of them.
@Rysky
I certainly think the Four should be vastly more powerful than your average demon lord, but that's not actually said anywhere in the material (or at least not in the material I've got).
@Lord Gadigan
The only issue with that is that both Urgathoa and Zyphus trust the daemons about as far as they can throw them. There's no mention of them getting involved in the war with Lamashtu for instance; the daemons are apparently supposed to have solved that problem on their own.
@Xanxal
All those other factions you mentioned (save maybe the qlippoth who we don't know much about yet) have deities in their corners and/or vast numbers, which helps to explain how no one has wiped them out. The daemons don't have that going for them.
The thing with Pharasma is actually quite problematic too--we're supposed to buy that the Four were able to force her to open the floodgates, when they one of the weakest factions around?
@everybody
Before someone gets the wrong idea, don't think I dislike the daemons; quite the opposite--I think they're a fascinating faction and that the Four are great villains. I actually wish that the daemons got as much exposure as their Chaotic Evil and Lawful Evil cousins.
I also get that the backstory presents the daemons as being able to stand up to Lamashtu and the demon lords or any other threat. My argument is that this information doesn't mesh well with what we're told about the daemons' power level, namely that the Four are on the level of demon lords/archdevils/what have you, and the harbingers with nascent demon lords/infernal dukes/etc. For the story presented in the fluff to make sense, I think that the daemons would have to be much stronger than the current rules suggest.
| PathlessBeth |
A thread whose very first sentence starts by referencing PF: Campaign Setting books and isn't about anything in the game itself should probably be in the Golorion/Pathfinder Campaign Setting forum.
...
...
Now that we've got that out of the way, the reason they exist in the PFCS is because of a quote from James Jacobs in which he said (IIRC) that the Adventure Paths were the soul of Paizo. Subsequently, a group of daemons convinced an AP-subscriber to hand over the APs, and the daemons claimed the Soul of Paizo, giving them complete control over Golarion. The horsemen haven't been statted, unlike the demon lords, because they secretly made themselves gods. They haven't told anyone, except me. Why? It's part of their Evil Plan...
Rysky
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Well that's simply a case of rules vs. stories. There's a lot of space in that 26 - 30 CR. Paizo had to set a roof so they did. That doesn't make a CR 30 any less intimidating, espicially since the rules for those creatures starts to veer off into "do whatever the F*** I want, try and stop me" territory.
Aspasia de Malagant
|
| 9 people marked this as a favorite. |
I've been thinking about this a lot lately, and I've realised that, going off of what's presented in the Books of the Damned, the daemons should have been wiped out a long time ago. Here's why:
First of all, everybody wants them dead. The demons, the devils, the empyreal lords, pretty much every body wants the daemons gone. Now, that in and of itself wouldn't necessarily damn the species to extinction (we could say similar things about the demons after all) but it will be important once we examine point two.
Secondly, and more importantly, the daemons are the weakest faction of the various archfiends. Think about it--according to their own faction book, each of the Horsemen is about en paar with a demon lord, archdevil, or empyreal lord. Each harbinger is of similar power to a nascent demon lord or infernal duke. This means there's a massive power disparity. There are eight archdevils, not counting Asmodeus (a god). There are countless demon lords, not counting Lamashtu (a god). There are many, many empyreal lords, not counting Sarenrae (again, a god). There are only four archdaemons, and they don't have a god in their corner (at least not since the Oinodaemon was bound).
With that in mind, how am I supposed to believe that Abbadon was able to resist Lamashtu's invasion, or any of the other incursions they've suffered. The daemons are so much weaker in terms of the power they have available to them, that there's no believable way they could have lasted this long. They are outnumbered and outgunned by Heaven, Hell, and the Abyss.
While we're on the subject, why was it decided that the daemons should be so much weaker? I get that the Horsemen of the Apocalypse theme is cool, but only four archdaemons? In all of Abbadon there's only four daemons who can stand up to a demon lord, archdevil, or empyreal lord? I find that hard to believe. It seems silly to make one faction so much lesser than the rest.
When I run a campaign, I'm going to have to alter the rules somewhat. I'll likely make the Four...
It's all a ruse, put on by the yugoloths. It's their greatest peel ever, to make everyone believe they don't exist (in Pathfinder). Daemons are just their servitors...
| Joe Shmoe 741 |
@Buri
Sure there will always be individual daemons, but that isn't what I'm talking about. I'm saying that the organized daemons presented in the books are badly outnumbered and outgunned, and going off the rules as presented, should probably have been reduced to a subsistence level by now. They shouldn't be a concern.
@Rysky
I don't know what I could have said that gave you the impression that I thought CR 30 was easy to defeat, I really don't. What I'm saying is that if in Abbadon there are only four beings (the Horsmen) who rate in that territory, then the daemons are screwed. Because in Hell there are eight, plus Asmodeus himself. There's even more in the Abyss, Heaven, Nirvana, etc, in addition to Lamashtu and Sarenrae. No matter how you slice it, the daemons are seriously underpowered when compared to the competition, and basically any decently organised invasion involving more than four beings in that CR 26-30 range should completely screw them.
That's unless, of course, you accept the argument you yourself proposed in your first post, namely that the Four are far more powerful than the vast majority of demon lords, archdevils, etc. That's certainly the take I myself would use in a campaign. Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be anything in material to back that up, which makes me think that someone in the company simply didn't do the math.
| PathlessBeth |
They won't ever go away for the same reason demons will never go away. There will always be corrupt souls in the universe to replenish their numbers.
Well, they are described as being pretty much the only outsiders who regularly oppose Nosoi. So, a better question is why Pharasma doesn't shift more NE people to the abyss or the nine hells...
| Buri |
Ah, you're mixing rules with setting. The setting is there to provide stories. It should exist with the rules but the rules don't dictate directly what is or isn't in the setting. Also, the things in the settings books are not rules. They're not even objectively true. There are a couple different creation myths across all the setting material. They all can't be true. They're often written from the perspective of the thing they're about. If you read a book about elves you'll get an elven perspective on things. They're player guides and GM guides to help get you in the mindset of a particular thing. That's about it.
| Buri |
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Buri wrote:They won't ever go away for the same reason demons will never go away. There will always be corrupt souls in the universe to replenish their numbers.Well, they are described as being pretty much the only outsiders who regularly oppose Nosoi. So, a better question is why Pharasma doesn't shift more NE people to the abyss or the nine hells...
Because that's not where they're supposed to go. Pharasma is very good at her job and has done it for countless millennia. If she started picking and choosing where souls go herself that would upset a lot of powers that are. Part of the reason all gods are on an even keel with her is she honors the compacts each of them make for a particular soul no matter how distasteful she finds the destination. If one faction or another got favored treatment, as it were, for "wildcard" souls that would shift the balance of power among the planes.
| RJGrady |
| 4 people marked this as a favorite. |
Even if demon lords outnumber the Horseman 10:1, that's not an overwhelming enough advantage to make it a cheap victory. Plus, with their expansive control of the soul trade, the first thing that happens when you attack the daemons is that it's very expensive.
I was thinking about what kind of person embodies the daemon mindset. Have you seen the cartoon, Crisis on Two Earths? Batman's counterpart is Owlman. He's been so profoundly disturbed by the arbitrariness of free will that he's decided to destroy the universe. Although an integral part of the Crime Syndicate, he has no meaningful loyalty to anyone. He's not erratic, but his quest, although methodical, has no really logical end. He just wants everyone and everything to die.
Rysky
|
I do subscribe to the that there only being 4 of them then they must be vastly more powerful than the other Demigods. And aside from Charon being the first Horsemen of Death and being one of the oldest beings in existence, the only thing else to put forward for their power is simply that, that there is only 4 of them and despite what they do they are still in existence and a legimate threat towards pretty much everybody else.
| Joe Shmoe 741 |
@Buri
I get that there has to be segregation of rules and setting, but even if you ignore the notions of CR scores, the setting material itself describes the Horsemen as being equivalent to demon lords or archdevils and the harbingers as being equivalent to nascent demon lords, and so forth. So ignoring all the rules, and just going off of the setting material, the problem still persists. Five empyreal lords/demon lords/archdevils and their followers should be able to devastate Abbadon with little difficulty. Lamashtu's invasion--provided she brought even one other demon lord along--should have ended in victory for her, not a retreat.
Now obviously this didn't happen. We're told the daemons defeated Lamashtu, and have fended off numerous angelic invasions, but we aren't told how, and there's nothing in the setting material to suggest they should be capable of it.
Personally, I think the easiest way to reconcile it is to assume that the Four are above CR 30 and that the harbingers average CR 23-28, rather than CR 21-26. But even that's just me throwing in a solution; it isn't one from the original source material.
@RJGrady
That might deter someone good aligned. A demon probably isn't going to care about the cost of victory (and we know for a fact that Lamashtu didn't care about the price).
I've seen the film. Owlman probably would fall into extreme neutral evil, given that his goal isn't so much destroying the universe for its own sake (which would trend more chaotic evil) but to put his own selfish desire (for his choices to matter) above everyone else's. He's a rarity though. Most omnicidal maniacs are chaotic rather than neutral. Though I wonder where Rau Le Creuset of Gundam SEED would fall in, given that his desire to kill everyone stems from both wanting to end his own miserable existence and the belief that he's performing a mercy kill on the rest of us. Probably still chaotic, though higher functioning than many.
@Rysky
I agree with you and run it that way. I just wish it was actually in the source material.
The Beard
|
Also keep in mind that we don't know how powerful the fifth horseman is. In fact, we barely know anything about it. It could very well be sufficiently powerful to overpower the entire menagerie of deities all on its own. If that's the case, I would assume Lamashtu called off her war with them due to having discovered that creature's true nature. What we do have is information that leads us to believe the fifth horseman is considerably more powerful than the other four--presumably, at the very least, around the level of a major deity. Just droplets of its blood alone is sufficient to create some of the most powerful daemonic servitors in the game.
I imagine the four horsemen would set that thing loose if it seemed like the plane of Abaddon was going to be taken by the forces of hell or the abyss.
| Buri |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
If you're talking logistics, I think their trump card is that there is only 4 of them. Demonkind is split into many, many factions. None of them are aligned with another long. Devils don't have this problem as much but they can't sacrifice their other schemes either. Likewise, the empyreal lords focus on things of larger scale than the daemons. As a whole they're a threat but the vast majority keep to their own corner of the multiverse. That isn't a problem.
Having said that, with just 4 of them they can unify an entire realm of existence in a staggeringly efficient manner unseen in most others. Well defended positions can defeat superior numbers without much effort.
| Kobold Catgirl |
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
That might deter someone good aligned. A demon probably isn't going to care about the cost of victory (and we know for a fact that Lamashtu didn't care about the price).
Actually, Lamashtu probably did, given that she had to pull out. The price became too steep.
The thing about fiends attacking other fiends can be summed up by looking at just demons.
Now, all demons hate each other. That's just a fact. They're jackasses. So, logically, two demon lords (A and B) could gang up and take down a third (C)--I mean, if they hate him, why not?
Why not? Well, then they've opened themselves up to attacks from their other enemies. Plus, C might be able to bring in help. To make matters worse, there's the chance they'll betray each other. It's just not practical.
Demon lords have that problem internally. On a larger scale, so do the different types of fiend. Devils attacking daemons? Demons move in. Demons attacking devils? Empyrael Lords show up and start wreaking havoc. Daemons may be seemingly weaker, but they're expensive and tedious enough that it's just not worth it--just like it's not worth it for demons to fight each other.
The fact that demons do it anyways is a very good reason why they haven't taken over the multiverse yet.
So why did Lamashtu lose? Well, daemons are better organized, obviously. Another important point is that the daemons know the terrain. Home turf advantage easily makes up for a little power disparity. Finally, daemons' control of the soul trade might have made Lamashtu's invasion so expensive she just couldn't afford to keep it going.
A key thing about daemons is that they're patient. A key thing about Lamashtu is that she ain't. Putting aside that strategic disadvantage, maybe she just got sick of a boring war and decided to call it quits and go home.
The Beard
|
Now, if Asmodeus were to lead a full assault on them, then I think they'd be toast. You could turn that into a campaign!
I'm inclined to agree based on current information that we can confirm. The big if still comes in the form of the fifth horseman. The only thing we know is that it's powerful enough to scare the other horsemen, and they evidently don't even fear major deities.
| Buri |
RJGrady wrote:The daemons are like evil Switzerland. You'd like to add them to your evil empire, and they're smaller than you, but they're well-defended, rich, and they have the phone numbers of all your frenemies on speed dial. Plus, mountains.And everyone there has military experience + guns.
Guns in the form of 3/day quickened disintegrate.
The Beard
|
The Beard wrote:Guns in the form of 3/day quickened disintegrate.RJGrady wrote:The daemons are like evil Switzerland. You'd like to add them to your evil empire, and they're smaller than you, but they're well-defended, rich, and they have the phone numbers of all your frenemies on speed dial. Plus, mountains.And everyone there has military experience + guns.
Oh, and everybody gives you diseases. Lots of diseases. All of the diseases, forever.
Lord Foul II
|
Joe Shmoe 741 wrote:That might deter someone good aligned. A demon probably isn't going to care about the cost of victory (and we know for a fact that Lamashtu didn't care about the price).
Actually, Lamashtu probably did, given that she had to pull out. The price became too steep.
The thing about fiends attacking other fiends can be summed up by looking at just demons.
Now, all demons hate each other. That's just a fact. They're jackasses. So, logically, two demon lords (A and B) could gang up and take down a third (C)--I mean, if they hate him, why not?
Why not? Well, then they've opened themselves up to attacks from their other enemies. Plus, C might be able to bring in help. To make matters worse, there's the chance they'll betray each other. It's just not practical.
Demon lords have that problem internally. On a larger scale, so do the different types of fiend. Devils attacking daemons? Demons move in. Demons attacking devils? Empyrael Lords show up and start wreaking havoc. Daemons may be seemingly weaker, but they're expensive and tedious enough that it's just not worth it--just like it's not worth it for demons to fight each other.
The fact that demons do it anyways is a very good reason why they haven't taken over the multiverse yet.
So why did Lamashtu lose? Well, daemons are better organized, obviously. Another important point is that the daemons know the terrain. Home turf advantage easily makes up for a little power disparity. Finally, daemons' control of the soul trade might have made Lamashtu's invasion so expensive she just couldn't afford to keep it going.
A key thing about daemons is that they're patient. A key thing about Lamashtu is that she ain't. Putting aside that strategic disadvantage, maybe she just got sick of a boring war and decided to call it quits and go home.
very well said, I just had the bit about the soul trade then I went and read some of the other posts and this one just takes the (probably evil) cake
| Grollub |
you are all also assuming that just because WE know how many demon lords, daemon lords, etc there are.. they each faction knows.
Daemons are notorious for deception..
Even assuming you as an enemy to daemons knows there are 4 horsemen, and havent heard of any others, do you risk starting another war to wipe them out, risking a counterattack from another faction in the midst of what could be a costly mistake?
If you were to attack the daemons, and found out they had 100 more lords in hiding and they all surface... then an opposing faction moves in to attack from behind, because the daemons made a deal, how dead are you?
| Farastu |
This is part of what was great about the earlier version of daemons (aka yugoloths) there was a more clear acknowledgement that however much they were hated, and however much they were sort of squeezed between the demons & the devils, they were useful and necessary.
Beyond that there were many very powerful beings that could be called daemon lords, and then there were the Baernoloths whom were terrible and powerful primal beings to a degree even beyond those.
It was the demodands/gehreleths whom were the weakest faction of fiends, having only a very limited number active at any time, and only one very really godlike being among the lot of them, whom unfortunately for them is imprisoned in the ice of the deepest lair of Tarterus. The daemons really hated the demodands with a passion, however that the daemons or anyone else could wipe them out is very unlikely, as demodands aren't truly killable in the permanent sense (granted the case could be debated that no fiends really truly are in actuality), and since they were native to a prison plane, they had a certain degree of security.
I suppose even in PF canon if there were a war launched that killed off the current number of Daemons though, they would only stay killed off so long, their numbers would replenish over time, and have at least some chance they'd manage to reach their current level of power and organization again at some point.
| Shadowdweller |
If most fiends hate everyone and every thing, why precisely should they single out the daemons?
Even if Lamashtu is much stronger than the daemons are collectively, that doesn't necessarily mean that she has the forces to win a multi-front war. Does one imagine Lamashtu's own myriad personal enemies would kindly refrain from attacking her if she were to devote her resources to eradicating the daemons?
The Beard
|
So I was doing a little reading through my collection of ungodly old books and happened upon information on Anthraxus, the once and again oinoloth (see: oinodaemon). That thing dwarfs Lamasthu in power to the point that it's fricking absurd. If we assume Pathfinder's oinodaemon is as powerful as Anthraxus, there's absolutely no contest there. That thing by itself could tear through the entire abyss like it was its job, destroying each and every demon lord it ran across with little to no difficult; yes, even if they were to attack all at once.
If that thing chained up at the heart of Abaddon is a Pathfinder analog to Anthraxus then uh... I think I know why Lamasthu called off her war. Pretty sure having an entire plane of existence disappear might be a bit of a problem. Worse still, it's the kind of problem that various Empyreal Lords, demons, and the forces of hell all aligning together for this unfathomable reason still most likely could not stop. And if they did? Ye olde Oinoloth/Oinodaemon, Anthraxus, isn't actually capable of being permanently killed. At all. By anything. Period.
| Douglas Muir 406 |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Apparently a version of Anthraxus is around in 4e, under the name Phraxas?
Anyway. I like the notion that the Four Horsemen are keeping something truly horrible chained up, and that a war to destroy them would unleash it. It's within the error bars of canon, and it also helps explain why nobody has marched to wipe them out -- if you "win", they throw the deadman switch and let Thingy out. Seems very appropriate for a bunch of NE creatures.
Also, I like "evil Switzerland".
Also-also, while PF didn't explicitly adopt the "endless Blood War in the lower planes" thing from 3e, it's reasonable to think that demons and devils don't get along, and that most of the powers on both sides would rather have a small nasty buffer state than share a border.
Also-also-also, there's no reason the Outer Planes have to be equally big and important. Abaddon could be a (relatively) tiny place, a thin strip of planar territory between Hell and the Abyss. Conquering it gains you the fun of killing the Horsemen, and some dreary territory that's more trouble to administer than it's worth, and... that's it. Why bother?
Also-also-also-also, while Abaddon has only four Horsemen, it might outnumber all other planes in terms of middleweight monsters with CRs between 15 and 25. We just don't know! Maybe the Horsemen wipe out everything over CR 25, but there are billions of advanced astradaemons or whatever. Abaddon's not militarily weak; it just has a very flat management structure. -- That actually works, if you think about it. Devils want to have lieutenants and viziers and minions. Demons aren't organized enough to cull their underlings consistently. But the Horsemen simply devour anything that's evolving into a potential threat. So over the eons, you get a backlog of creatures just below that cutoff point.
Also5, maybe Abaddon itself is long-term hostile to anything that's not a daemon. I mean, it's the plane of pure evil. So maybe even other fiends must eventually, over years or centuries, either become NE or suffer some sort of wasting degeneration. Maybe it works faster with weaker creatures -- so the reason Lamashtu withdrew was, more and more of her foot soldiers were either dying or turning into some sort of daemon.
Honestly, there are a LOT of possible explanations that fit within both RAW and splatbook narratives and descriptions.
Doug M.
| Cuàn |
Also note that there are rumours that Charon, the oldest and only original horseman might be a tad hard to get rid of: He is supposed to be the river Styx, which runs through Abaddon but also touches Axis, Hell and the Maelstrom.
As for Lamashtu, she has many enemies, especially among the other demons (Pazuzu comes to mind) those demons might actually be interested in keeping the daemons around so Lamashtu can't focus on a single thing to eliminate but has to divide her attention.
| Mark Hoover |
| 9 people marked this as a favorite. |
Charon is the river Styx, but also the Boatman that ferries souls; a representative conduit for souls.
Pharasma is the conductor of souls along a great spiral to their final destinations.
This means they're doing very similar jobs. They're also on speaking terms and partially neutral in alignment. Maybe they have an office romance?
"So, Phasy-honey, I heard talk of a potential war coming my way. The guys, y'know, the Horsemen? Well, they're all like 'bring it!' but, y'know, it's gonna like, break stuff n' junk. Plus, you know how this is gonna end. So could you like, do somethin about or whatever?" *doffs hat to brush hipster hair from his dead eyesockets*
"Oh Cha-Cha, you know I can't say no to your puppy-dog exposed sinus cavity! Hang on, I'll divine over it" *Mother of Fate pulls Ultimate Cell Phone and begins texting* "Handled. That b*$&h s(*^t Lamashtu was all like 'I'm gonna TOTS wail!' and I was like 'Oh no you d'int just threaten my man's realm' and then she was like 'whatev's' and then she quit. Now let's go make out on your boat!"
I'd imagine that's basically been slowly playing out over about a billion years, but you get the gist.
| Aelryinth RPG Superstar 2012 Top 16 |
Daemons are infinite in number, just like demons. Their numbers are constantly replenished from across the multiverse.
The 4 Horsemen control ALL DAEMONS.
Lamashtu controls a small portion of the demons in the Abyss.
Slaughtering daemons just opens up paths to power for lower daemons, who get ramped up as their betters die. All invading the Wastes does is temporarily reduce the number of lower level daemons, get a lot of them promoted early, and let them focus their attentions on the invaders instead of mortal souls and one another.
Hell has better things to do then try to control the pragmatically duplicitous and untrustworthy daemons who simply want to see them all dead, too.
What the Abyss had was a huge build up of larval souls that spontaneously got converted in demonkind, creating a huge mass of them. However, incoming new demonic souls are accumulated no faster then any other alignment, and so erosion over time is going to wear the numbers of demons, who infight enthusiastically, down to lesser power, even if they started from a much higher base.
Also keep in mind there are gods in the Wastes who might not like divine invaders, either.
==Aelryinth