Dragon Disciple: 'Might Dragon'???

[Kyrinn S. Eis]

Hi,

Where is this explained/detailed?

Thanks,

[Dennis da Ogre]

Kyrinn S. Eis wrote:

Hi,

Where is this explained/detailed?

Thanks,

Might(y)

It's a typo and it's been pointed out in the errata thread

[Set]

The Might Dragon is detailed in MMVI, between the entries for 'Light Dragon' and 'Wight Dragon.'

[Kyrinn S. Eis]

Yeah, yeah. Thanks a lot. :P

[flash_cxxi]

Set wrote:

The Might Dragon is detailed in MMVI, between the entries for 'Light Dragon' and 'Wight Dragon.'

I thought the Sight Dragon was in there before the Wight Dragon? I'll have to go back and re-read mine again now.

[KaeYoss]

Those Hard'n'Heavy Dragons rock. Hard. They're the most dangerous of metallic dragons.

[Mark Moreland]

I've always preferred the Sorta Dragon and the Maybe Dragon over the Might Dragon. Their level of ambivalence and lack of commitment it epic!

[Dennis da Ogre]

yoda8myhead wrote:

I've always preferred the Sorta Dragon and the Maybe Dragon over the Might Dragon. Their level of ambivalence and lack of commitment it epic!

Those probabilistic dragon's are tough to pin down. You might also check out the the Hypothetical Dragon and Schrödinger's Dragon.

[LeonMaes]

all of there and no one has mentioned the theoretical dragon

the Sorta Dragon and the Maybe Dragon are cool but this one is father of all the possible dragons

[Mark Moreland]

LeonMaes wrote:

all of there and no one has mentioned the theoretical dragon

the Sorta Dragon and the Maybe Dragon are cool but this one is father of all the possible dragons

Could be

[GeraintElberion]

LeonMaes wrote:

all of there and no one has mentioned the theoretical dragon

the Sorta Dragon and the Maybe Dragon are cool but this one is father of all the possible dragons

The Theoretical Dragon is a bit to certain for me, I prefer the Hypothetical Dragon, Antithetical Dragon and their children; the Synthetical Dragons.

[Lathiira]

I'm trying to find stats for the Statistically Significant Dragon. Where were they at, exactly?

[Fischkopp]

Lathiira wrote:

I'm trying to find stats for the Statistically Significant Dragon. Where were they at, exactly?

Isn't this a 4e one?

[Mark Moreland]

Lathiira wrote:

I'm trying to find stats for the Statistically Significant Dragon. Where were they at, exactly?

They are on the elemental plane of margin of error.

[Lathiira]

yoda8myhead wrote:

Lathiira wrote:

I'm trying to find stats for the Statistically Significant Dragon. Where were they at, exactly?

They are on the elemental plane of margin of error.

Ah. Is that at the juncture of alpha=0.05 then? Or at the site of Confidence Interval?

On another note, I'm also looking for the Might-Not Dragon.

[KaeYoss]

Lathiira wrote:

I'm trying to find stats for the Statistically Significant Dragon. Where were they at, exactly?

I hear they advance not in age categories, but in standard deviations.

[flash_cxxi]

Lathiira wrote:

On another note, I'm also looking for the Might-Not Dragon.

There Might-Not be Stats for that one.

[toyrobots]

Fischkopp wrote:

Lathiira wrote:

I'm trying to find stats for the Statistically Significant Dragon. Where were they at, exactly?

Isn't this a 4e one?

Probably! :D

[Shadowborn]

I've always found the idea of having both an Almost Dragon and a Not Quite Dragon to be rather redundant...sort of like having both Cloud and Mist Dragons.

[Stereofm]

flash_cxxi wrote:

Set wrote:

The Might Dragon is detailed in MMVI, between the entries for 'Light Dragon' and 'Wight Dragon.'

I thought the Sight Dragon was in there before the Wight Dragon? I'll have to go back and re-read mine again now.

Wasn't this the Fight Dragon to begin with ?

[Set]

Stereofm wrote:

flash_cxxi wrote:

Set wrote:

The Might Dragon is detailed in MMVI, between the entries for 'Light Dragon' and 'Wight Dragon.'

I thought the Sight Dragon was in there before the Wight Dragon? I'll have to go back and re-read mine again now.

Wasn't this the Fight Dragon to begin with ?

Possibly the Blight Dragon or the Tight Dragon.

But definitely not the Right Dragon.

[Deific Paragon Time Dragon]

Set wrote:

Stereofm wrote:

flash_cxxi wrote:

Set wrote:

The Might Dragon is detailed in MMVI, between the entries for 'Light Dragon' and 'Wight Dragon.'

I thought the Sight Dragon was in there before the Wight Dragon? I'll have to go back and re-read mine again now.

Wasn't this the Fight Dragon to begin with ?

Possibly the Blight Dragon or the Tight Dragon.

But definitely not the Right Dragon.

Don't forget the Height Dragon, Bright Dragon, and Slight Dragon.

Or the Perhaps Dragon.

[LeonMaes]

Dail Fragon?

[Xaaon of Xen'Drik]

the high-flying Kite Dragon

and the over-looked Trite Dragon.

[Set]

The Night Dragon just beat up the A'ight Dragon because of a grammar dispute.

[LeonMaes]

Night Dragon "shut up im bigger than you"

A'ight Dragon "Sir I kindly ask that you stop profiling me just because of my outrageously mispronounced name, if you would oblige me its All is Right Dragon"

Night Dragon "shut up im bigger than you!!!"

Statistically Significant Dragon "you both wrong"

and with that the Statistically Significant Dragon opens a portal to the elemental plane of margin of error and pushes them in

[Xaaon of Xen'Drik]

Unfortunately the Knight Dragon killed itself...some dispute about a princess...

Apparently he'd spoken to the Plight Dragon.

[NotMousse]

Everyone forgets about the Slight Dragon, tiniest of all dragons.

[Matthew Morris]

Stereofm wrote:

Wasn't this the Fight Dragon to begin with ?

Rule number 1, you don'ttalk about Fight Dragon.

[GeraintElberion]

NotMousse wrote:

Everyone forgets about the Slight Dragon, tiniest of all dragons.

Slight Dragons are huge compared to Mite Dragons.

I've always avoided Slight Dragons anyway, they're almost as rude as Spite Dragons!