
![]() |

Gurubabaramalamaswami wrote:What the hell is that half-babe half-yuck thing in the blog?! Gross! She even hedges out Mammy Graul for the position of most disgusting illustration.That's hot!
I'm guessing she's Urgathoa.
That's what the image is titled if you click on it and look at the source file. I find her sort of sexy, but then again, I say that while covering up my screen from her waist down.

![]() |

Mothman wrote:That's what the image is titled if you click on it and look at the source file. I find her sort of sexy, but then again, I say that while covering up my screen from her waist down.
That's hot!I'm guessing she's Urgathoa.
Ah. I should have done that, it would have saved me the brief moment of confusion as to whether she was Urgathoa or Lara Flynn Boyle.
Either way, hot.

Gurubabaramalamaswami |

yoda8myhead wrote:Mothman wrote:That's what the image is titled if you click on it and look at the source file. I find her sort of sexy, but then again, I say that while covering up my screen from her waist down.
That's hot!I'm guessing she's Urgathoa.
Ah. I should have done that, it would have saved me the brief moment of confusion as to whether she was Urgathoa or Lara Flynn Boyle.
Either way, hot.
LFB wears more leather.

Dennis da Ogre |

What the hell is that half-babe half-yuck thing in the blog?! Gross! She even hedges out Mammy Graul for the position of most disgusting illustration.
And I thought the mummy chick was bad... wow this is something else. The worst part I think is that she's topless... Just imagine running into her in a dark alley ugh

![]() |

Andrew Crossett wrote:I noticed that as well. Maybe we should add humility to her domains?I think she has beautiful legs. Shapely.
I find it hilarious that she feels the need to cover up her breasts. I'd think modesty would be rather beside the point in her case.
I think it's to keep the books PG-13 instead of R. Though there's been plenty of R-ness in other products. Still, she'd probably cover up other exposed areas if there were anything but bones to see. Waist down she's much less sexy as bony isn't my style.

![]() |

I find it hilarious that she feels the need to cover up her breasts. I'd think modesty would be rather beside the point in her case.
There's three reasons we ordered Urgathoa's art in this pose.
1) To avoid showing the nipples.
2) To give her a creepy sort of modesty and messed-up flirtatious look.
3) To poke fun at the USA's weird double-standard re: violence and sex. It's okay to show a woman who's been disemboweled and half-skeletonized... BUT FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOLY DON'T SHOW HER NIPPLES!

![]() |

There's three reasons we ordered Urgathoa's art in this pose.
1) To avoid showing the nipples.
2) To give her a creepy sort of modesty and messed-up flirtatious look.
3) To poke fun at the USA's weird double-standard re: violence and sex. It's okay to show a woman who's been disemboweled and half-skeletonized... BUT FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOLY DON'T SHOW HER NIPPLES!
4) Annie Leibovitz tricked her into posing like that. Ugathoa's father is outraged.

Stebehil |

yoda8myhead wrote:I find it hilarious that she feels the need to cover up her breasts. I'd think modesty would be rather beside the point in her case.There's three reasons we ordered Urgathoa's art in this pose.
1) To avoid showing the nipples.
2) To give her a creepy sort of modesty and messed-up flirtatious look.
3) To poke fun at the USA's weird double-standard re: violence and sex. It's okay to show a woman who's been disemboweled and half-skeletonized... BUT FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOLY DON'T SHOW HER NIPPLES!
Heh. Cool reasons all, especially the last one.
And I like the pic, it´s creepy but cool.Stefan

![]() |

There's three reasons we ordered Urgathoa's art in this pose.
1) To avoid showing the nipples.
2) To give her a creepy sort of modesty and messed-up flirtatious look.
3) To poke fun at the USA's weird double-standard re: violence and sex. It's okay to show a woman who's been disemboweled and half-skeletonized... BUT FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOLY DON'T SHOW HER NIPPLES!
I can see her femurs ... ooo, femurs ...

![]() |

yoda8myhead wrote:I find it hilarious that she feels the need to cover up her breasts. I'd think modesty would be rather beside the point in her case.There's three reasons we ordered Urgathoa's art in this pose.
1) To avoid showing the nipples.
2) To give her a creepy sort of modesty and messed-up flirtatious look.
3) To poke fun at the USA's weird double-standard re: violence and sex. It's okay to show a woman who's been disemboweled and half-skeletonized... BUT FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOLY DON'T SHOW HER NIPPLES!
Yeah that annoys the ever living hell out of me. Pity you guys didn't push things anyways.

Gurubabaramalamaswami |

Just noticed the flies and maggots bursting from the mess at her feet (I mean how many of us were looking at the feet anyway?). Can we expect an undead monster called the Sons...er...Spawn..um...or Children of Ky...ahem...Urgathoa?
Seem to have something caught in my throat. Hey! It's writhing! Ack!

![]() |

She's actually perfectly willing to show us her nipples. She's just not exactly sure where she left them...
"Yeah the pepperoni on this pizza is awesome. Where did you find it..? Wait. it's what? Oh god...."
Seriously though, I cannot wait to use her followers in game play. Very cool deity. She's bringing sexy back.