Pathfinder Adventure, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
Angel Hunter D wrote:
Investigator had a pretty major change to their core combat feature between the playtest and the APG release and the difference is pretty clear -compare Study Suspect/Studied Strike to Devise a Stratagem/Strategic Strike and it really feels like they pulled off something fun. However, take that with a grain of salt -I only minorly looked through Oracle and never had a chance to play Witch or Swashbuckler, so I'm not as aware of if there were any playtest to release issues. But going from playing the playtest investigator to release has been a lot better and easier I've found
Pathfinder Adventure, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
I had to get the Slithering generated separately due to how starting my adventure sub with Dead God's Hand went and I had to get it generated by customer service. I now have an order for the Slithering separate from my July sub shipment (Order 24337729) and the order for the Slithering shows as not having a valid payment method.
Pathfinder Adventure, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
So, I'm looking at my July upcoming shipment (no order has been generated as yet), and while I have the Slithering flipmat, I'm not actually seeing the Slithering adventure in items. I know there was a bit of a problem earlier as I originally had subscribed with my first order being Dead God's Hand, but it's just being a bit weird rn.
Pathfinder Adventure, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
Just wondering, as I originally signed up for the Adventure subscription to begin with Dead God's Hand (Order 8072924), will I get copies of The Slithering and Troubles in Otari at all? I was just a little concerned as The Slithering isn't showing up in my expected shipping for the next few months while the maps are. Thanks for your support in this difficult time. Hope everyone is safe and well.
Pathfinder Adventure, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
Quietly seething. Group was going in to do the Varl Wex fight, and I had to remind them about the aid another rule because there was no way they could make a lot of those perception checks (most of the party decided for some obscure reason to all dump wisdom bar the ranger and psychic). And then Wex arrived, realised they were there, snuck in through the window, and nearly got a strike on the defenceless and unaware bard... And I rolled a nat 1. And that basically set the tone of the entire fight. Any attack roles I made were natural 1s, any saves were 15+ (so our save-or-suck oracle felt useless). It was over in 3 rounds and Wex didn't get a single hit in after I was warning them "This is a CR9 encounter and you guys are all level 5". Oh, and now the ranger has Balgorrah and doesn't seem too keen on giving it up until the value of it was mentioned.
Pathfinder Adventure, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
Based on a note in Gods and Magic about the great scar on Golarion's moon, was Tsukiyo a god at the time of Earthfall and if so, did he have any relationship with Acavna as a moon goddess and did her death affect him at all? Part of me was wondering if Acavna and Tsukiyo's deaths may have been linked in any way due to their shared portfolio of the moon.
Pathfinder Adventure, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
So, this came up and I really need an idea of how to rule this. The level three skald performance states this: ACG pg. 49 wrote:
However, the mounted Overland movement rules state the following: CRB pg. 171 wrote:
Would you rule that Song of Marching allows mounts to hustle without taking the lethal damage?
Pathfinder Adventure, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
James Jacobs wrote: I just started an office campaign in Ravounel, based on a small county on the southwestern border. Building up a LOT more Ravounely info there... although it's pretty isolated from Kintargo and the rest. Maybe I'll toss it out there for folks to check out some day, but in the meantime, glad to see folks are having fun with Ravounel as well! It's probalby my favorite new nation addition to the setting. Ah! I want to know so much about it right now! Between my Hell's Rebels group and one of my Hell's Vengeance PCs playing a Jhaltero, I'm trying to get as much about Ravounel down as possible. And yeah, it's been so much fun to play with as a setting, and I'm genuinely excited to see where it goes later. Now I need to go tell my Age of Ashes GM what I think each of my Silver Ravens would be doing in 4717AR, aside from possibly having to deal with incursions from the Darklands -ooooh, maybe something to do with Ilvarandin? A Song of Silver spoilers: Due to a player having serious triggers with respect to bugs being on people, I'm planning to replace the hellwasp swarm in the Temple of Asmodeus with an intellect devourer, since if she's already this stressed out about bugs on people, bugs in people will just be too much. I did check in, and brain eating and puppetting the corpse is fine, just not bugs.
Pathfinder Adventure, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
So, I got my hands on Tomorrow Must Burn and I figured I'd make some notes of things that are changed/updated between the descriptions of Ravounel from Hell's Rebels and 4719AR. Of note, the implication is that the rebellion took around 2 years, assuming a start date of 4715AR then with the last few books taking place in 4717AR.
As for Kintargo, there's some updates to things.
Overall this is pretty interesting. It definitely suggests that the "official canon" Ravounel won't end up a democracy like Andoran or similar. It's still beholden to the nobility and landowners (though to be fair, the existence of the Board of Governors basically implied that anyway). Bainilus called herself "Domina", a title from the old Chelaxian empire, and while we know that the strix, aquatic elves and Vyre representatives all sit on a broader Council of Peers but their interactions tend to be fractious. I definitely found this stuff helpful for building up stuff as I continue running my group through stuff. Also, we finally got NPC art for Chuko!
Pathfinder Adventure, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
Hell's Rebels (so Ravounel, so right on Citadel Enferanc's region) has Ithanothaur, a CN mature adult umbral dragon (so CR 15) living in the North Plains on the Cheliax-Nidal border.
Pathfinder Adventure, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
blahpers wrote: As you noted, protection from evil doesn't provide immunity to mind-affecting effects. Psychic inception doesn't interact with it at all. But the spell description itself explictly states the target is immune to any new attempts to possess or exercise mental control over the target. Since they're immune to charm and compulsion effects (which are, by definition, mind-affecting), and psychic inception allows the mesmerist to affect immune targets with their mind-affecting spells and abilities (albeit with a 50% chance of it actually working each round and having to stare at them the whole time), it does actually have at least some corralation. Otherwise, this basically says that a 1st level spell with a duration in minutes per level can basically shut down an entire class.
Pathfinder Adventure, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
So, this has just come up in the game of Hell's Vengeance I'm running. One of the PCs is a mesmerist and I'm getting close to putting them up against the first character in a while who might actually have a chance of beating their Bluff checks. The NPC's tactics in particular call out their use of Protection from Evil. And this is where I come to a stumbling block. I've read the FAQ on Protection from Evil (it blocks spells like charm, dominate, suggestion, etc) and the spell itself calls out immunity to such effects. However, the mesmerist's first bold stare was psychic inception, and I could do with some advice on how the two would interact. FAQ text and Stare Description here:
FAQ wrote:
Occult Adventures wrote:
My reading from this would be that things like Charm Person or Suggestion would only have a 50% chance of working each round. Would this be a correct reading?
Pathfinder Adventure, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
zimmerwald1915 wrote:
Yeah, I'm already changing up the fonts, due to a player with dyslexia in my group, I'll shift Carmus a bit. The bit about "Part of the Land of Nidal" came from a map of Scotland from the 1600s I used as inspiration, but I definitely agree that it isn't really needed. Been shifting some of the stuff around as well, your thoughts on this one?
Pathfinder Adventure, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
So, I'm still not 100% happy with these, but your thoughts so far? First is this one which doesn't have Acisazi or Kitkasiticka marked on it. Second is one after the aquatic elves and strix have made their thoughts known on how terrible these Chelish cartographers are, which can be found here. Both are pretty big actually, so zoom in.
Pathfinder Adventure, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
zimmerwald1915 wrote:
Would you mind dreadfully if I used these and your musings on town names for a larger, "in-universe" map of Ravounel I've been working on for my campaign? This stuff has been so useful for fleshing out the region and really helped me as a GM, but since I'd probably be posting some stuff online, I'd rather check with you before doing so. |