Cow

YawarFiesta's page

Organized Play Member. 895 posts (904 including aliases). No reviews. No lists. No wishlists. 2 aliases.


RSS

1 to 50 of 895 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Any chance of a new Necromancer cleric achetype?

Humbly,
Yawar


3 people marked this as a favorite.

What is the issue with Jordan Peterson? His twelve rules for life are kinda self-evident.

Humbly,
Yawar


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Likewise, light, frivolous, or outright false accusations of those are also offensive, and arguably harmful, as they diminish real cases.

Humbly,
Yawar


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Kobold Catgirl wrote:

A big part of the problem, I think, is that some people came out swinging against Erik Mona with some pretty unkind insinuations--about him, about the freelancer, and about everyone who supported the change. And if someone comes in telling us that we're stupid, fragile, SJWs, snowflakes, or any of the other phrases that we hear so often from a certain other crowd, we're really not going to be inclined to assume good faith.

Some posters assumed the worst of the freelancer, Owen, and Erik Mona. It led us to assume the worst of those posters. A lot of us did make an effort to extend good faith to those who were extending it to us. I may disagree on some issues with Oppsylum and Nerve Eater, but I had no issue talking to them respectfully about these issues, because they did some due diligence in being respectful to us.

But someone who comes out the gate insulting me and implying I'm an idiot who doesn't understand that obviously Paizo isn't literally advocating the return of slavery, without first asking us what we're actually concerned about to make sure he has it right? And then refuses to back down? Who shows zero empathy towards the freelancers' discomfort?

Yeah, I'm kind of going to assume he's a racist troll. Or just a normal troll who's really obsessed with this slavery issue for some reason.

And I might spam him with "sheep shalm" a lot, but it's only because "sheep shalm" is the best joke I've ever told literally ever and I would rather focus on my swan song than someone who thinks he can sue Paizo for child neglect or whatever's going on over there.

It goes both ways, people have assigned me some heinous point of views based on the worst possible, and then some, interpretation of my words. I admit that sometimes my reaction has been "somewhat" inflammatory.

Humbly,
Yawar


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Cori Marie wrote:
Paizo will tell you to buy your books however is best for you. Yeah they'd prefer you subscribe, but they understand that's not always an option. They still make money off the books that Amazon sells, unless you think Amazon gets those by magic.

Paizo has also stated that they depend on their subscription model to predict print volume and cash flows. Also, whatever commission Amazon takes for selling books from Paizo is the lost revenue I was talking about.

Or to put the issue I was exposing in simpler terms, Paizo would prefer you would buy directly from them, but, arguably, is not giving enough incentives to do so.

Maybe my issues only applies to South America or Peru deliveries, but the shipping cost differences (no free shipping to here) justify buying the PDFs and books apart rather than subscribing. Plus I can track through Amazon, but not through Paizo.

Humbly,
Yawar


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Cori Marie wrote:
I don't know how to tell you that yes, you should care about other human beings more than your hobby. If shipping costs are so detrimental to you nobody is forcing you to buy from Paizo.com.

Yes, people probably should care more about other people than they do. The issues is, exactly, that they don't and buying from Amazon is way cheaper than buying from Paizo. That is lost revenue for Paizo.

Humbly,
Yawar


2 people marked this as a favorite.

One thing is to include content warnings and making a setting in which everyone can be represented, other, very different, is deliberately removing things for the setting as to avoid offending someone. The former one is good, the latter one almost inevitably leads to to a never ending downward spiral.

Humbly,
Yawar


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Are you implying that the average consumer cares more about the salary of the delivery man than cheap prices? Because it is them that determine which business practices are successful.

Humbly,
Yawar


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Right now, I could buy the Absalom and Monsters of Myth through Amazon and save around 60 dollars in shipping to Peru. So, yes, Paizo shipping is excessive, it barely compensates the free pdf which not really that big of a bonus since AoN is a better tool for rule searching.

Humbly,
Yawar


Thank very much, everything seems to be in order. Great service as always. ;)


Please cancel order + subscriptions.

The shipping is excessive! I would be buying the PDF for night of the Gray Death directly and harcovers from Amazon.

Thanks in advance,
Yawar

PD: thanks for you great work, your service is very much apreciated =)


Ravingdork wrote:

Until recently, the Westgate district on the western side of Absalom had a regular "running of the bull" (actually a gorgon) sport.

Excerpt from "The Absalom Initiation" wrote:
The eponymous statues of Statue Street are the remnants of a longstanding Absalomian tradition: to prevent overcrowding in the city’s prisons, nonviolent offenders were allowed to compete for a pardon in a race to outrun an angry gorgon along these streets. Those who successfully outpaced the beast were allowed to go free; those less fortunate now line the streets as bizarre décor. The ethics of the practice are dubious at best, and it was recently outlawed.

There the "running of the bulls", that it's pretty much the same but with bulls and the participant enter willingly, some are even turist, no substantial prize other hospital bills covered. Won't be surprised if something similar pops in Taldor or back in Absalom. However since there is no score, I don't see how it could become a sport.

Humbly,
Yawar


Diego Valdez wrote:
Bans remove a persons access to everything, including purchased PDFs. Suspensions only remove access to the forums. Suspensions are usually timed. But the timing has to be set, if it is not the suspension is indefinite until manually lifted. If the concern was that banned posters wouldn’t have access to purchased PDFs anymore a permanent suspension does the same thing while leaving PDF access.

Why not issue indefinite suspension instead of bannings?

Humbly,
Yawar


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I wish I had the space for that!


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Personally, I think the world, COVID and COVID measures aside, was doing better than ever in general terms. It is just that the media has tendency to acentuate the negative. "COVID deaths acheive new record low" doesn't grab as many eyes as "Newly discovered COVID variant from Tangamandapio could render vaccine ineffective!".

Humbly,
Yawar


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Kobold Cleaver wrote:
Do you think transphobic and racist comments are just differing opinions, Leon? That's very interesting. See, the way I see them, they are a part of efforts by some posters to maintain this as a space they control, a space minority posters must either toe the line in, force themselves to be invisible in, or leave. It wasn't long ago that trans people largely stayed silent on these forums for fear of being mocked or othered or harassed or threatened, as has, in fact, happened a few times over the last few weeks. I'm sure you wouldn't prefer a return to those days.

Main issue is that people here seem to have have different definition of what racism or transphobia is.

Humbly,
Yawar


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Personally, I think it would be better if Paizo had incremental degrading suspension system, depending on the transgressions you get a multiple hours to days of suspension that increases which each repeated offense getting a longer suspension, but said increase decays naturally overtime without further violations. Currently, someone might even be inclined to reply to a post just to force the mods hand. However, I don't think Paizo has the infrastructure to implement such measures.

More importantly, it is important that people know when and why their post are deleted at the very least so they can know how much is to much and appropriately correct their behavior. I made a similar request over a year a go.

Finally, Paizo needs to update their community guidelines. It is completely possible for forum newbies to engage in inappropriate behavior because they were unaware of the addendum to the guidelines in the Off-Topic subforum.

Humbly,
Yawar


Congratulations Mike! Thanks for your answers!

Yawar


6 people marked this as a favorite.
Yoshua wrote:
Paulyhedron wrote:
Cori Marie wrote:
I'd like to point out that respect is something that should not be freely given, and the people that have been argumentative about topics such as what is transphobic for the past month and a half have done nothing to earn my respect.
I’m the opposite, you’ve (everyone) has my respect until they don’t. Respect is given then kept by being earned.

Respect is valuable. Common Courtesy is what I freely give. I am kind to everyone until they lose that.

People often say Respect when they mean Courtesy. Maybe not you, but there is a subtle and vast difference between the 2 words for me.

Respect:
a feeling of deep admiration for someone or something elicited by their abilities, qualities, or achievements.

Courtesy:
the showing of politeness in one's attitude and behavior toward others.

I do not personally admire anyone until they have shown me they are worthy of my admiration. I can be polite to anyone and everyone and it costs me nothing.

Respect can also means:

"due regard for the feelings, wishes, rights, or traditions of others"

Which is the definition, I believe, gets conflated with "courtesy".

Humbly,
Yawar


1 person marked this as a favorite.
James Jacobs wrote:
Calliope785 wrote:

Hi James,

When it's said that Sorshen "seduced and betrayed all of her fellow runelords", is that LITERALLY all of them, throughout all of Thassilon's history? Or just the final ones? Or just at least one of each school/sin?

I'm asking because I'm rather interested in what Alaznist's sexual/romantic orientation was, and if she ever had any partners, affairs, or romantic friendships. So I was curious to know if she and Sorshen ever had any such attachments.

She seduced some of them, betrayed others, and seduced and betrayed a few others over the course of the thousands of years.

Alaznist, in my mind, didn't have much of an interest in romance at all, and so I mostly avoided that topic. The way her sin, wrath, interfaces with romance and sexuality means that an exploration of her preferences in print would be impossible to publish information on if we wanted to stay true to her chaotic evil nature, since that sort of content isn't appropriate for publication in a Paizo Pathfinder product. Alaznist is the most violent and sadistic and cruel of all 7 runelords. That's wrath for ya.

Alaznist and Sorshen never had friendly relations. But Sorshen certainly betrays Alaznist, most notably in her role in Return of the Runelords in how she...

** spoiler omitted **

So, you could say she is bi-furious?

Humbly,
Yawar

PD: sorry, I couldn't resist =(


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Yoshua wrote:

Incorrect argument about first name not being doxxing though. Any identifiable information is in fact doxxing. It is not limited to a specific name. Especially in instances when attempting to cause harm. Which intimidation legally is extremely harmful.

The personal definition of a first name isn't doxxing does not hold up in a court of law especially considering I had the users full name, state they lived in and multiple social media account names in under 10 minutes just by having his first name.

For reference:
https://felonies.org/is-doxxing-illegal-personal-information-revealed-onlin e/

Go to Clickified.

18 U.S. Code § 2261A.Stalking
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2261A

Go to Clickified.

Harassment:
noun
aggressive pressure or intimidation.

Legal Defintion:
Go to Clickified.
harassment
(either harris-meant or huh-rass-meant) n. the act of systematic and/or continued unwanted and annoying actions of one party or a group, including threats and demands

Dox:
verbINFORMAL
gerund or present participle: doxxing
search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the internet, typically with malicious intent.

So, with those definitions, by default, doxxing is harassment. It is a form of intimidation, not informative in the slightest.

I was not arguing that it was not doxxing. I was arguing that what is generally understood by doxxing is associated with calls to action and vigilantism. It is a loaded term and it is worth clarifying that it was just first name rather than full info and a call to action. Just look at the examples of doxxing in Wikipedia.

Humbly,
Yawar


8 people marked this as a favorite.

So, let me get this straight. Previously, I've been told that calling a call to action that lacks any sort of due process a "witch trial" or "lynch mob", even though technically correct, is wrong, because the long past history of harm associated with said terms.

However, calling that stupid, childish and reckless power play a "doxxing", even though it is a word loaded with a history of harming innocents, disproportionate retribution and internet vigilantism and implies a call to action, because it is technically correct.

I am starting to think that certain people in this forum would rather win instead of having a honest discussion.

Humbly,
Yawar


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Tender Tendrils wrote:
Grankless wrote:

I'd like to remind certain posters in this thread that "reverse racism"does not exist in any way shape or form, and there is no systemic oppression of white people in America (or most places in the world, really).

Diego's story also really makes me question what Lisa is even still doing at the company. Does she collect a paycheck as CEO? It's disheartening to see such mismanagement, and though I wish the best for Jim and Mike, I do wish other people could have at least been *considered* for the position.

Exactly. Prejudice or Discrimination can be specific, but Racism/Sexism/etc are historical, structural and systemic. That is what makes them -isms.

No, but it requires a college course in Newspeak and Doublethink to make that artificial distinction. The whole racism = power + prejudice is made to excuse racism against white people by obscuring language.

Humbly,
Yawar


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Tender Tendrils wrote:
YawarFiesta wrote:

It is worth noting that he "only" call the person by their first name. While a childish power move, it lacks the "call to action" part generally implied with the word.

I believe he was just that stupid.

Humbly,
Yawar

Using the first name is still very threatening, and carries the implied threat of releasing the full name.

People have been successfully doxxed via just a first name before as well.

Again stupid, childish, and bad; but, to give an extreme example, is like conflating accidental manslaughter with an assassination or murder 3.

Humbly,
Yawar


3 people marked this as a favorite.

There is world of difference between "I wouldn't be so cocky, Jhon" and "I wouldn't be so cocky, Jhon Doe from 123 Evergreen st. Springfield CA 12345, phone number 999 888 7777, and email address jdoe@gmail.com. It would be shame if someone contacted your employer at management@abcde.com. Actions have consequences!".

Both would be breaches of privacy, the latter would be closer to what most people associate with doxxing. Both would bad, the latter would be worse.

Humbly,
Yawar


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Yoshua wrote:

It was definitely doxxing. Jeff admitted in the thread he did it to 'show he was serious' about the issue. Read: Intimidation Check but rolled a 1.

The person he did it too not only felt targetted by the doxxing but it took almost 2 weeks to get the doxxing removed with ahalf hearted apology.

As for the lack of communication I see it as one of 2 things, neither of them great.

Either their legal told them to stop engaging or they are deciding on their own that to not engage is a good idea.

I know we weren't given a timeline for when a follow up would happen, but the radio silence really speaks volumes. I stopped posting in here constantly for the same reasons KC lists. I am tired of arguing, but that doesn't mean I am not still watching. The union is a good move in the right direction, but that isn't reflective of Paizo or their Leadership. The workers had the votes lined up, there was no way to stop the Union from happening, just delay and raise angst.

Accepting the inevitable is not progress.

Do better Paizo.

It is worth noting that he "only" call the person by their first name. While a childish power move, it lacks the "call to action" part generally implied with the word.

I believe he was just that stupid.

Humbly,
Yawar


5 people marked this as a favorite.
Master Han Del of the Web wrote:
YawarFiesta wrote:
keftiu wrote:
Leon Aquilla wrote:
I'm disappointed that the mods have opted to leave some incredibly rude posts at the top. It's clear that certain vulgar opinions are permitted.
What’s “rude and vulgar” about wanting more diversity in leadership?

The racist implication that people who share their skin tone form a sort of monolithic gestalt collective for starters. Representation is cool, but representation for representation'sake is harmful.

Do you think the persons were hired because their impressive CVs or because Lisa Stevens, like Robin D'Angelo, feels uneasy around black people?

Humbly,
Yawar

Man am I tired of this particular refrain.

Wanting more diverse people in positions of power is not representation GONE MAD. It's basic math comprehension revealing worrying hiring trends and underlying biases within the industry that need to be addressed. The only way to address them is through ACTION.

Basic statistic comprehension will tell you that is perfectly plausible to have 5 randomly selected individuals in majority white country be white before taking into account any regional or cultural variance that could skew chances even farther.

To give you an example, if you go to an Evo tournament you are likely to find that more than 90% of attendants and competitor are black and/or asian. Does this means that there is a systematic antisemitic, anti-white or anti-latino discrimination problem or some cultural quirk?

Humbly,
Yawar


15 people marked this as a favorite.
keftiu wrote:
Leon Aquilla wrote:
I'm disappointed that the mods have opted to leave some incredibly rude posts at the top. It's clear that certain vulgar opinions are permitted.
What’s “rude and vulgar” about wanting more diversity in leadership?

The racist implication that people who share their skin tone form a sort of monolithic gestalt collective for starters. Representation is cool, but representation for representation'sake is harmful.

Do you think the persons were hired because their impressive CVs or because Lisa Stevens, like Robin D'Angelo, feels uneasy around black people?

Humbly,
Yawar


The River Kingdoms definitely have jousting and competitive archery if I remember correctly from Kingmaker AP.

Any sort of international or big national league or standard would be implausible due to long travel times so there is likely wild regional variations in a "rugby VS soccer" kind of way.

Humbly,
Yawar


2 people marked this as a favorite.

It has a non directly Jewish or religious meaning "amulet" but it doesn't really apply. It is likely that the origins of the term in D&D is somebody grabbing a thesaurus more than 40 years ago.

However, "soul cage" lacks punch. I would prefer something more evocative like "anima anchor".

Humbly,
Yawar


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Totally Not Gorbacz wrote:
Funny, I didn't know that French post-revolution anarchy was caused by ** spoiler omitted ** but as usual with Ixal, you learn something new every time he spins his "Golarion is Earth with dragons" tale.

It is a fantasy version of the Reign of Terror, it is like saying that World of Darkness is not set in the equivalent of the real world because the equivalent of real world events in the Word of Darkness were influenced by vampires and mages.

Humbly,
Yawar


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Rysky wrote:
Thank you for that non-sequitur.

Is it? You were arguing that Golarion doesn't need to be historically accurate, because it was made to be its own thing and not some alternate history "but with magic".

We know how people in certain situations adapted and survive, so given the same situation should be similar unless there is a justification for that.

For example, you would expect something like medievalish rural marriage to have 9 to 12 kids and only 3 reaching adulthood, just ballpark numbers. Now, if they have a much modern family structure with 3-5 kids and literacy it needs a justification, they would need access to a contraceptives (Pinkberry extract is mentioned as being sold by alchemist in Sandpoint's Gazeteer so its), printing press and a way of distribution (its invented in Golarion and traveling book salesmen are mentioned at least in the Kingmaker videogame), some sort community schooling or pastoral schooling, and access to Healthcare (easy, via a local priest). Now if the family lives far away from any town (more than a half a day trip) then a parent will have to stay at to educate and take care of the kids and either would likely be trained on herbalism/ alchemy/ nature.

It is not argument saying Golarion "it was like this in the medieval period so Golarion has to be like this" . It is a question of "How is this part of Golarion different from the period and place it evokes or based off and how are the changes justified in-universe?"

Humbly,
Yawar


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Rysky wrote:

“ We've all got an internal picture of what historical cultures were like. From some combination of movies, video games, novels, books, museum visits, school or university courses etc.

Golarion is NOT a world built up from scratch to be explicitly its own world (as, for example, Glorantha or Empire of the Petal Throne are). Instead, its very very deliberately built on a wide variety of common tropes”

This does the exact opposite of justifying “historical accuracy” arguments.

The land is a media quilt hodgepodge, historically accurate to earth has no basis.

A world being built in order to accommodate different vessels for pulp and fantasy tropes doesn't that mean that said vessels aren't interconnected or that said interactions aren't consistent with the rules expectations establish by the setting. For example:

- Why do the forces of good don't stop the diabolist nation? Because there is a bigger and more immediate existential threat.
- Why do prosthesis exist if there are spells and rituals that could make the need for said prosthesis go *poof*? Because said spells and ritual are way more expensive.

Humbly,
Yawar


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I thought it was well established that Golarion had "dance halls". I don't think something ambiguous enough to go from Maid Pirate Cafe to Hooters is out of the norm.

Then again, one wouldn't be blamed to asume that Paizo received a stern from Ingsoc's Junior Anti Sex League between editions.

Humbly,
Yawar


Apparently, there are some protection for non-union workers that go on strike, but the devil is on the details.

Humbly,
Yawar


Because, supposedly, you have a specific set of demands and grievances, and a deadline before the strike.

It doesn't matter anyway as it apparently would not be viable in Washington.

Humbly,
Yawar


I meant before the union was recognized. Could they "fire at will" without recognizing the union?

Humbly,
Yawar


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Wow, sucks to live in there, then. One question, why wouldn't Paizo fire the employees organizing the union in that case? Or, is there a provision against that type of union busting?

My problem with unions is that what workers rights they defend are already enshrined in law and, while they may have valid reasons for forming, like every social or collective movement without a define clear goal, almost inevitably become unnecessary fat more interested in perpetuating its own existence than improving anything.

Humbly,
Yawar


1 person marked this as a favorite.

A simple strike with a list of demands is also relatively easy to organize.

Humbly,
Yawar


6 people marked this as a favorite.
Jarek Khasad wrote:
With regard to to your union logo, was the communist symbolism really necessary? Something more akin to the AFL-CIO or the Teamsters logos - but still Pathfinder/Starfinder-like - would have been far more appropriate. Maybe something incorporating the Open Road symbol instead of a tool harkening back to the hammer and sickle.

Is not a raised fist or a hammer and sickle. Chill. Anyway, good luck with the endeavour. Let's hope the best may come from this.

Humbly,
Yawar


Proposed optional rule: You can invest in weapons. If you do so, you can use your Class DC rather than the item's DC.

What do you think?

Humbly,
Yawar


3 people marked this as a favorite.

It is more that almost everything is gendered, in latin languages and in Spanish the male plural form is, usually, also gender neutral so trying to force gender neutrality on it is not only sounds alien, but also silly. You might need to be native Spanish or Latin language speaker to understand how awful "latinx" sounds.

Humbly,
Yawar

PD: this is also why it is a pain to translate non-binary characters to Spanish, there is no equvalent for gender neutral pronouns or conjugations. (Blue Finley is a ghost/ Finley, el azul, es un fantasma/ Finley, la azul, es una fantasma)


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Terevalis Unctio of House Mysti wrote:
Yoshua wrote:

Going to say that I bet those who are recognized appreciate the opportunity to share their stories, and thank you Luis, Diego and Joseph for sharing a bit of your life with us.

Thank you Diego for pulling back the curtain a bit as to why this came out a bit late, and appreciate that even with all the craziness going on you got the chance to share your story with us too.

Any time we can recognize humans for humaning it is a great boon for our community to be able to see into the lives that enrich it. We are a melting pot, and come out stronger for it :D

Melting pot entails losing culture and language. This should not happen.

I respectfully disagree. It means losing part of the original culture, yes, but also mixing it with the local culture and creating something new. For example, Peruvian cuisine is of world renown not because of ancients Quechua cooking traditions alone and Chinese-Peruvian cuisine, AKA "Chifa", is distinctively different from traditional Chinese meals.

Humbly,
Yawar


5 people marked this as a favorite.
keftiu wrote:
YawarFiesta wrote:
TwilightKnight wrote:
YawarFiesta wrote:
Given that around only 1% of latinos appreciate that term
Care to produce any evidence of that statistic? I found some indicating awareness and usage, but little about preference or appreciation, and even that was not inline with your claim.

Sure. Oops, it was around 3%, I stand corrected.

Humbly,
Yawar

The title of this article literally says "One-third who have heard of the term Latinx say it should be used to describe the U.S. Hispanic or Latino population," which is why I (an American) am using it to describe creatives in America employed by an American company.

One third of the fourth that had heard the term say the term should be used, two thirds of the fourth that has heard the term think it should not be used. Only around 3% of the total prefer the term. I hope you understand the term is divisive and consider offensive by some.

Humbly,
Yawar


3 people marked this as a favorite.
TwilightKnight wrote:
YawarFiesta wrote:
Given that around only 1% of latinos appreciate that term
Care to produce any evidence of that statistic? I found some indicating awareness and usage, but little about preference or appreciation, and even that was not inline with your claim.

Sure. Oops, it was around 3%, I stand corrected.

Humbly,
Yawar


4 people marked this as a favorite.
keftiu wrote:
YawarFiesta wrote:
keftiu wrote:
Yoshua wrote:

A way for me to see a blog as not performative is to get a few in rotation around the year during months where it isn't a focus of 'that month'

Black History isn't just a month and done situation. Trans Rights isn't just a focus for Trans people one day a year. Indigenous people, Migrants, Women aren't all catch phrase issues to spot a highlight on when it suits the time.

People with Disabilities for example got a HUGE highlight in Guns and Gears that I personally did not see coming. Love that type inclusion because any time someone can be represented for who they are and shown that who they are is seen.

I also acknowledge that over time we have definitely seen spot lights for marginalized communities outside of the 'window of opportunity' from time to time.

For me, that is just one aspect of the visible work that shows me that work is being done. Just a tip for someone to put down in their spreadsheet of 'Hey this isn't a bad idea, lets revisit that'

The whole reason I’m so mad at Paizo’s misconduct is /because/ of how good their books have largely been (in the last 3~ years) on queer representation, and on other issues; I think the Mwangi Expanse book is one of the most important releases in the d20 space for how right it does by African fantasy, and I’m fired up for Arcadia because of how scant indigenous and latinx fantasy is.

To see a company really doing well with inclusivity and diversity in their products drop the ball with real people? It aches.

Please, don't use imposed, top-down derogatory terms to describe latin-american people.

Humbly,
Yawar

I was introduced to the term by the Mexican father of my best friend, who is a professor of Latin American cultural studies at the local university and has several published books on the subject. Is he incorrect?

Given that around only 1% of latinos appreciate that term, yes.

Humbly,
Yawar


2 people marked this as a favorite.
keftiu wrote:
I'm tired of those 6 white cis men thinking the opinions and perspectives of everyone else don't deserve a seat at the table... or thinking that my existence is a difference of opinion.

Who said that you were excluded at that table, rather than the table being formed organically? If anything, you or me, as a latino, might excluded from the second table for only agreeing on 97% of things.

Humbly,
Yawar


4 people marked this as a favorite.
keftiu wrote:
Yoshua wrote:

A way for me to see a blog as not performative is to get a few in rotation around the year during months where it isn't a focus of 'that month'

Black History isn't just a month and done situation. Trans Rights isn't just a focus for Trans people one day a year. Indigenous people, Migrants, Women aren't all catch phrase issues to spot a highlight on when it suits the time.

People with Disabilities for example got a HUGE highlight in Guns and Gears that I personally did not see coming. Love that type inclusion because any time someone can be represented for who they are and shown that who they are is seen.

I also acknowledge that over time we have definitely seen spot lights for marginalized communities outside of the 'window of opportunity' from time to time.

For me, that is just one aspect of the visible work that shows me that work is being done. Just a tip for someone to put down in their spreadsheet of 'Hey this isn't a bad idea, lets revisit that'

The whole reason I’m so mad at Paizo’s misconduct is /because/ of how good their books have largely been (in the last 3~ years) on queer representation, and on other issues; I think the Mwangi Expanse book is one of the most important releases in the d20 space for how right it does by African fantasy, and I’m fired up for Arcadia because of how scant indigenous and latinx fantasy is.

To see a company really doing well with inclusivity and diversity in their products drop the ball with real people? It aches.

Please, don't use imposed, top-down derogatory terms to describe latin-american people.

Humbly,
Yawar


3 people marked this as a favorite.
keftiu wrote:
Berhagen wrote:
Yeah their diversity seems quite marketing focused. Plenty of heritages to get attention but not really equal attention given….. but then I guess it is corporate diversity, not real diversity which is where it appears a large of the current disconnect comes from….. talking the talk, but not walking the walk…
What is “real diversity”?

Diversity of opinion and perspectives. I hardly could care less about the plumbing preferences, family tree or melanine levels of a person. Theree could be more diversity at a table with 6 white cis-males from different backgrounds or political affiliations, than in another with [insert 6 different permutations of minorities and/or women] that happen to agree in 99% of things.

Humbly,
Yawar


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Thanks, arrived there from a link at the Union Paizo website, didn't realized it was a separate movement/ faction. I really should not post from my cellphone before before sleeping.

Humbly,
Yawar