Search Posts
I'm assuming Teralindar's Honor can talk. Mode of communication is not specified, but with all the languages it knows, I'm assuming it's somewhat verbose. Otherwise the Read Magic ability and aberration detection powers become somewhat less cool. Any thoughts? how did you handle it in your game? Edit: I bought the Syrinscape sound pack for What Grows Within, so I plan to keep using Upianshee's voice clips during fights as she throws warnings and issues battle cries... ;)
Switched to a level 1 PC. Instead of Clides Ftr3, I'm bringing Alpo'ol Clr1.
So, for Dusty Rose Prism, we have "This aeon stone allows you to cast the 1st-level shield cantrip as an arcane innate spell, surrounding yourself in pink energy." --> can this be done at will, 1/day, 1/hour, etc. 'As an arcane innate spell' means what? 2e says "Innate cantrips are cast at will and automatically heightened as normal for cantrip unless otherwise specified," which suggests you can use the shield cantrip at will (although in this case, the Dusty Rose Prism wording specifies it's the 1st-level version, and so you can't heighten it). Just want to confirm this basically can be done each round on your turn if you want to...
Games also get marked inactive automatically after a certain length of time with no posts. (I'm not sure if posts in discussion count or not) In similar cases in the past the PBP VA issued chronicles for the players or found a GM to finish the game. Either solution is not always 100% to the table's satisfaction but sometimes it's better than nothing.
I'll be prepping Book 6 in the coming months and will try to answer some of your questions Grumpus. The way I see it: Xhamen-Dor only exists if anyone is thinking about it. If all knowledge of it dies, it's gone. But as soon as some fool of a Took grabs a book about it and reads, it's back on like toenail fungus!
Having a hard time visualizing it's use in play with the current wording: Altruistic Guardian (Su):
At 10th level, once per day when a spell or supernatural effect that allows spell resistance targets a Magaambyan arcanist’s allies or if they are within its area of effect, as an immediate action she can redirect the effects to herself. She can do this for a number of allies up to her Intelligence modifier, provided they are within 30 feet of her. The Magaambyan arcanist must attempt the appropriate saving throws for each ally, possibly attempting multiple saving throws against the same spell or effect. She takes all damage and suffers all conditions and other effects that her allies would have taken, possibly taking these multiple times. This protects allies only from damage and conditions they’d take at the time she spends the immediate action, not from any they might later suffer from a noninstantaneous spell or effect. Anyone has had play experience with this? it seems massively hurtful unless something clever is enacted before triggering the ability...
I'm a bit confused about how the seedborne corruption should work on npcs. My group is travelling with a cohort and Kaklatath, and they are about to camp in the city. So if these two fail the will and fort save, are they waking up seeded and trying to attack the group? I dont see any rules about how quick the progression is. Does a paladins' immunity to disease work against the seedborne consumption? I don't see anything that says otherwise. And can a paladin's 'remove disease' mercy work against it? (or the 'remove disease' spell cast by other characters?) I'm especially worried for Kaklathat's frail elderly body. Does the adventure assumes she is somewhat immune to this for the same reasons the PCs are? (i.e. 'due to exposure to XD's influence during previous ordeals and dreams')
I would love to be able to play an Antipaladin of Hei Feng. Red Mantis Assassin would be my evil of choice!
I'm still running and playing pfs1e, but I switched to vtt, as I don't have the patience to stretch a scenario over 3 to 4 months via pbp. If I have one recommendation for pfs 1e: create a third campaign/button for evil PCs only, I.e.: 1. Pfs1e standard (existing)
One would have to copy/paste additional resources into a different url and then just edit it to allow evil options. Just a thought...
I will GM the following tomorrow: THURSDAY JUN 20, 6:30-10:30PM (GMT-07 a.k.a. West Coast leisurely times a.k.a. after the kids are in bed at 9:30 on the East Coast)
Details and signup on Warhorn over here.
GM Jeff and Aries have graciously offered to GM two (2) tables of the following: FRIDAY MAY 24, 6:30-10:30PM (GMT-07 a.k.a. West Coast leisurely times a.k.a. after the kids are in bed at 9:30 on the East Coast) PFS1 1-48: The Devil We Know, Part 4: Rules of the Swift Details and signup on Warhorn over here.
GM Yours has graciously offered to GM the following: TUESDAY, MAY 7 6:30-10:30PM (GMT-07 a.k.a. West Coast leisurely times a.k.a. after the kids are in bed at 9:30 on the East Coast) PFS1 1-29: The Devil We Know, Part 1: Shipyard Rats Details and signup on Warhorn over here.
This feat is actually better in the hands of someone with Solo Tactics, IMO: you'd get the bonus, but your ally does not get the penalties, as he doesn't have the feat. Yes LOL this could lead to fun RP interactions. But alas, mechanically, the 'Fall Guy' still has to spend his turn bumbling around as a standard action by virtue of 'Solo Tactics' wording: "The allies’ positioning and actions must still meet the prerequisites listed in the teamwork feat for the inquisitor to receive the listed bonus."
This feat is actually better in the hands of someone with Solo Tactics, IMO: you'd get the bonus, but your ally does not get the penalties, as he doesn't have the feat. Which isn't much of a bump in regards to this feat, IMO, as it's probably one of the worst one you could pick for someone with Solo Tactics: anything that relies on anyone else for your feat to come online isn't much of a 'Solo' tactic, IMHO... ;)
There’s a spot open again. I didn’t realize the game was hosted on discord rather than here on paizo, so I’ve withdrawn. Thanks anyway! I can't stand the Discord format for PbP... there's just something about it that doesn't work as well as the Paizo boards for some reason. The lack of exhaustive headers and inability to link your sheet to a clickable avatar/name is probably what bugs me the most.
I have an aasimar boon I haven't used yet... I'll make a vigilante and let you know how that went in a few years. VC Dalsin: "Pathfinders, I have a mission for you six. "
There's also the restriction to a single combat pet per scenario, plus the necessity of handle animal checks. Can the PC earn additional XPs if he defeats his own pet in single combat though? :P
Heighten Spell being the exception, yes, as it is the purpose of the feat. A heightened fireball is a 4th level spell, but a stilled fireball is still 3rd level spell (that occupies a 4th level slot), the same way quickened magic missile is a 1st level spell (that occupies a 5th level slot). The DCs are set as per the level of the spell, not the occupied spell slot (except in the case of heightened spell). For more details and examples please refer to the metamagic rules.
Archives of Nethys spells out the cost for Rifle Scrolls: Riffle Scroll
...note the weight for each chapbook, lowly STR wizards... ;)
I don't think applying silenced spell would affect the caster level, as evidenced in the pricing of rifle scrolls. Applying a metamagic feat does not change the caster level of the spell. It just costs a higher level slot to cast the modified spell.
|
