| 4 people marked this as a favorite. |
Like normal errata, basically. It would be a great help for those that rely on current books or AoN and it would make discussion after release much easier. I tremble in fear whenever I think of having to check everything manually on AoN to update my few books with the changes.
I don't know if the team in charge is planning to do so or not, but I really hope they do.
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
I'm sure they will as compatibility is a touchstone of this project (I tink they even referred to it as "Errata+" in the stream). In addition, communities like Reddit 2e have been great about contributing to our overall knowledge.
I feel like certain things -- like a "translation guide" for rules elements that have changed names -- will be absolutely required if compatibility is to be maintained. I'm sure Paizo understands this, but I am curious what form(s) such a guide might take.
I feel like certain things -- like a "translation guide" for rules elements that have changed names -- will be absolutely required if compatibility is to be maintained. I'm sure Paizo understands this, but I am curious what form(s) such a guide might take.
I'm assuming/hoping a blog and/or pdf.
Yeah, I'd like it if only to act as a summary document so I don't have to go treasure hunting for the differences.
I feel like certain things -- like a "translation guide" for rules elements that have changed names -- will be absolutely required if compatibility is to be maintained. I'm sure Paizo understands this, but I am curious what form(s) such a guide might take.I'm assuming/hoping a blog and/or pdf.
I'd suggest both. But I'm also wondering if they won't devote a page or two in the new books for the big stuff. Curious to see.