|
From splintersoul's splintered identity class feature:
For example, a splintersoul with barbarian levels, a lawful-good social identity, and a neutral vigilante identity can’t use his vigilante talents or his rage class feature while in his social identity, but he regains these abilities and can use them as normal as soon as he changes to his vigilante identity.
Should this be interpreted as a fix to unchained barbarian (released prior to Antihero's Handbook), which omits rules for ex-barbarians?
I would interpret the splintersoul example as a reference to the original barbarian's 'A barbarian who becomes lawful loses the ability to rage and cannot gain more levels as a barbarian. She retains all other benefits of the class.' The unchained barbarian has not generally replaced the original barbarian.
Since an unchained barbarian has an alignment restriction and absolutely no indication what that means, I'd use the rule for the original barbarian with it (assuming that I was using alignment and the unchained barbarian; not a given for either).