| Mightydaveman |
Hey I was liking this archetype but I am really having trouble figuring out the Advanced Weaponry portion.
Basically it seemed like the Fighter was the easy way to qualify for this but also has the most overlap.
Can anyone help me figure out other classes that can reasonably qualify for this archetype?
This is a home game and my GM is much more RAI than RAW if that helps.
| Perpdepog |
Plus you can also do some unorthodox stuff too, like making a Barbarian who wields an oversized dueling sword or a ranger who dual-wields them.
I wouldn't recommend the latter. You would lose out on your parrying feats if you went that route, though you can build a great duelist without one, and since your off-hand weapon isn't agile you'd be eating higher MAP for trying to duel wield, though you can make some of that up with Flurry.
I do really like the idea of someone doing fancy swordplay with a sword longer than they are, though.
| Ventnor |
Ventnor wrote:Plus you can also do some unorthodox stuff too, like making a Barbarian who wields an oversized dueling sword or a ranger who dual-wields them.I wouldn't recommend the latter. You would lose out on your parrying feats if you went that route, though you can build a great duelist without one, and since your off-hand weapon isn't agile you'd be eating higher MAP for trying to duel wield, though you can make some of that up with Flurry.
I do really like the idea of someone doing fancy swordplay with a sword longer than they are, though.
Another thought is an Aldori Duelist Ranger with the Precision Hunter’s Edge and an Animal Companion. Probably not as damaging as a dual wielder or an archer, but it could be fun.