PFS Chronicle Sheets

[Saleem Halabi]

Is there any ETA on when PFS Chronicle sheets will be released for Strange Aeons? We're half way through book 2 and I have some characters I would like to apply the credit towards. =)

[adullin]

Ditto any news on this?

[Damien McGurrell]

Yep would be cool.

[YogoZuno]

I took one look at the setup and decided it would be fairly unlikely this AP would ever be PFS approved! Same with Hell's Vengeance.

[zook1shoe]

even though they are approved in the Additional Resources? I've noticed the same with several other APs.

here's the APs that have no chronicle sheets and their approved adventures.
- Council of Thieves (26, 27, 29)
- Kingmaker (31, 32, 34, 35)
- Hell's Vengeance (all 103-108)
- Strange Aeons (all 109-114)
- Ironfang Invasion (115-117)

[YogoZuno]

Approved in Additional Resources simply means you can use mechanical options from the AP in PFS. Things like items, spells, critters, or new feats. It has no bearing on whether or not the adventure is sanctioned for play in PFS.

Ironfang is simply the latest AP, and not really finished yet, so I wouldn't expect it to be sanctioned yet. Kingmaker is still one of the more unusual setups, and probably not conducive to fly-in, fly-out Pathfinder Society members, same with Strange Aeons. Hell's Vengeance is all about working for an Evil boss, so really wouldn't work for PFS characters, imo.

So, Council of Thieves is really the only standout. I'm not familiar enough with it to know what might be different - is it for 3.5, rather than PF? Is it due for an update? Is the setup not really conducive to PFS agents?

[Davor Firetusk]

Council of Thieves is 3.5

I made the pitch elsewhere Hell's Vengeance and Strange Aeons would both make a ton of sense to sanction for the first time only in campaign mode. They should be played as a cohesive story.

[Adam Daigle]

I can't speak to sanctioning as that is in John and Linda's court, but I did want to clarify that Council of Thieves was indeed the first Adventure Path to use Pathfinder rules rather than 3.5.

[John Compton]

At this time I can only say that any sanctioning would need to wait for after Gen Con. Strange Aeons may be a little difficult to sanction, but I don't foresee any reason that it wouldn't be appropriate.

[Saleem Halabi]

Awesome! Thanks for the reply.

[YogoZuno]

Wow, cool, and unexpected! I would have thought that the whole amnesia thing wouldn't have worked for PFS, but great.

[John Compton]

YogoZuno wrote:

Wow, cool, and unexpected! I would have thought that the whole amnesia thing wouldn't have worked for PFS, but great.

Most Adventure Paths and modules need at least a little nudging to make them fit in the Pathfinder Society Roleplaying Guild. Sure, Strange Aeons will be a bit of a challenge, yet it should also make for some really neat Chronicle sheets (maybe some "rediscovering your forgotten self" theme boons).

[zook1shoe]

Thanks for considering this. I've always thought it weird that they are legal, but you don't get a chronicle sheet for playing them.

[Michael Monn]

Yeah all the AP'S need some massaging because it is an AP not a scenario. It just requires a little gm innovation, but only small parts are sanctioned in PFS mode. Campaign mode is easy peasy.

[Saleem Halabi]

Now that con season is over, is there an ETA on the chronicle sheets? =)

[dwayne germaine]

dotting for future interest

[YogoZuno]

Any updates?

[Davor Firetusk]

None that I am aware of unfortunately. I have finished two books so far

[Phredd]

Soooooo.......

Any word on this?

Asking for a friend.

[Davor Firetusk]

I wonder if it would be possible to let some Venture critters volunteer to put these sanctioning documents together, with multiple people doing it you would get some automatic checking on the items and then a couple of different ideas on boons that the organized play team could look at and choose from or edit.

[Phredd]

In case you missed the blog, it has been sanctioned. You can find it on the product page for the first book.