| VRMH |
Azten wrote:
"Levels of different classes that are entitled to familiars stack for the purpose of determining any familiar abilities that depend on the master's level."
Ah, but the trick here is: they're not different classes. It's the same class.
The intent of the rules is clearly not to allow "super Familiars", but the RAW does permit it in my opinion.
Lorewalker
|
Chess Pwn wrote:
nope. You only count a level once for something. So you could either have a familiar at -2 or a familiar at full level, but not combined.
This is not a fact. Though, some GMs do rule this way. Thought I would clear this up.
This is how you can have ACs which are higher level than you are, which is something that has been ruled possible and for PFS was given a limit of max HD per the masters level.Also, an over-leveled familiar is not super in almost any way. You get a bit more AC, a bit more INT and you get some of the familiar powers early. But nothing game-breaking in the slightest. Since the familiar cues off of your skills(except sage), your HD and your BAB which has nothing to do with the familiar's level.
| Azten |
VRMH wrote:
Azten wrote:"Levels of different classes that are entitled to familiars stack for the purpose of determining any familiar abilities that depend on the master's level."Ah, but the trick here is: they're not different classes. It's the same class.
The intent of the rules is clearly not to allow "super Familiars", but the RAW does permit it in my opinion.
You don't count a class twice. That's just common sense.