combat expertise and declaring actions


Rules Questions

Sovereign Court

hi there
i can assume that combat expertise can kick in only when you declare (as by rule) and execute the attack ?
and the AC modifier will kick in in that moment and until the start of your next round ?

i had this situation

player A, with initiative count 27 and a readyed action (melee attack)
npc b, with initiative count 30 and readyed action (witchfire ranged attack)

at count 30 the npc starts its attack (he is flying overhead and so Player A cant attack him at all)
i roll 2 times, hitting the ranged touch armor of the player A, that says "i am using combat expertise, since i am a fighter lvl 12, i have my AC raised by 7, dodge bonus, so my AC isnt 15 (and i could have hit him 2 times with my rolls) but 22, ending with 2 misses

i could have ruled anyway, the GM rules as he wants, but didnt knew exactly wich was the correct ruling.
so i am asking.
i could say he couldnt use combat expertise, since
1) he couldnt even attack them, hence his readyed action wasnt performable (the melee attack) and his CE was henceforth useless
2) a declaration of eventual full defense had to be done at his round, and not at mine, but since he was readying (but an attack and not a defense... ) he could act before me

any suggestions are appreciated


Assuming he did not have combat expertise active from the previous round he has not taken an attack to use combat expertise with.

Further, I'm not sure whether or not you can ready an attack and use combat expertise.

Quote:

Combat Expertise (Combat)

You can increase your defense at the expense of your accuracy.

Prerequisite: Int 13.

Benefit: You can choose to take a –1 penalty on melee attack rolls and combat maneuver checks to gain a +1 dodge bonus to your Armor Class. When your base attack bonus reaches +4, and every +4 thereafter, the penalty increases by –1 and the dodge bonus increases by +1. You can only choose to use this feat when you declare that you are making an attack or a full-attack action with a melee weapon. The effects of this feat last until your next turn.

It's unclear what should happen when he readies to attack.

Further, if he didn't say he wanted to use combat expertise when he readied then didn't.

Edit:
With further reading

Quote:
Readying an Action: You can ready a standard action, a move action, a swift action, or a free action. To do so, specify the action you will take and the conditions under which you will take it. Then, anytime before your next action, you may take the readied action in response to that condition. The action occurs just before the action that triggers it. If the triggered action is part of another character's activities, you interrupt the other character. Assuming he is still capable of doing so, he continues his actions once you complete your readied action. Your initiative result changes. For the rest of the encounter, your initiative result is the count on which you took the readied action, and you act immediately ahead of the character whose action triggered your readied action.

It seems within rules to ready an attack and simultaneously declare that you would use combat expertise. But you would need to clarify that you are using it then. I also think it wouldn't kick in until you actually make the attack.

Sovereign Court

yeah, i was assuming the same.
but what i need to stress out here is if

1) you can declare combat expertise as declaration of intent (and then not going to attack, because of a lack of viable targets)

2) you cant declare combat expertise if you arent going to attack nothing (even if the declaration stands before going to execute the attack properly)


You must make the attack to use combat expertise.

So he could ready to attack and declare he was going to use combat expertise when he did so. But the effect of combat expertise wouldn't come into play until he made the attack.

You are right that he cannot declare he is using combat expertise if he has nothing to attack. The ready is an exception that says "I'm waiting to attack when there is a viable target". When he makes the attack (which might not happen at all) then he gets to benefit from anything that he can do with the attack, which would include combat expertise.

Sovereign Court

Thanks claxon !


No problem, glad to be of help.


The AC bonus wouldn't kick in until he actually makes the action he is readying and this attack would occur immediately before the triggering action. Lets look at some scenarios:

Characters A, B, and C; A is a PC while B and C are enemies. Initiative is as follows: A-30, B-27, C-20. A got highest so he takes his turn first. He readies an action to attack when someone attacks him and plans to use Combat Expertise. B goes next and he makes a ranged attack. This would be a valid trigger, but A can't reach B so A never gets to trigger his readied action. He hasn't declared his Attack yet; he has only declared a readied action. Thus, he gets no AC bonus. Now C walks up and attacks A in melee. This triggers the readied action which occurs at initiative 20 just before character C. A makes his attack, using Combat Expertise, and now has the bonus AC. Then character C completes his attack against A and A gets the AC bonus against this attack.

Now lets look at a slightly different order: Everything is the same, except A gets a 20 on his initiative roll and, since his initiative modifier is +5 and C's initiative modifier is only +3, A goes before C, but they both share the same initiative count (20). B attacks A. A has not yet set up his readied action so this attack simply goes through. On A's turn, he readies his action. Then C triggers A's readied action. A still didn't get the benefit of Combat Expertise when B attacked him because A hadn't yet made his attack. The result is the same, as it should be; A didn't actually attack until initiative count 20 and, consequently, doesn't get the AC bonus until that time.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Did he declare who was attacking? He could attack a clump of grass and still benefit from Combat Expertise.

A designer said something to that effect long ago, during the 3.5 days I think.


Yeah, attack an 'invisible' person in an adjacent square. Who knows, there could be one there.

Dark Archive

Would he be able to ready an action to attack, and only decide to use Combat Expertise once he gets the opportunity to attack (but obviously before he rolls to hit)? I'm pretty sure Power Attack lets you do this, but I don't know if Combat Expertise does.

Power Attack wrote:
Benefit: You can choose to take a –1 penalty on all melee attack rolls and combat maneuver checks to gain a +2 bonus on all melee damage rolls. This bonus to damage is increased by half (+50%) if you are making an attack with a two-handed weapon, a one handed weapon using two hands, or a primary natural weapon that adds 1-1/2 times your Strength modifier on damage rolls. This bonus to damage is halved (–50%) if you are making an attack with an off-hand weapon or secondary natural weapon. When your base attack bonus reaches +4, and every 4 points thereafter, the penalty increases by –1 and the bonus to damage increases by +2. You must choose to use this feat before making an attack roll, and its effects last until your next turn. The bonus damage does not apply to touch attacks or effects that do not deal hit point damage.
Combat Expertise wrote:
Benefit: You can choose to take a –1 penalty on melee attack rolls and combat maneuver checks to gain a +1 dodge bonus to your Armor Class. When your base attack bonus reaches +4, and every +4 thereafter, the penalty increases by –1 and the dodge bonus increases by +1. You can only choose to use this feat when you declare that you are making an attack or a full-attack action with a melee weapon. The effects of this feat last until your next turn.

Looking at it, I'm thinking "no", but I'd love a second opinion. :)


_Ozy_ wrote:
Yeah, attack an 'invisible' person in an adjacent square. Who knows, there could be one there.

You can attack a vacant spot. You don't really need to even "suspect" an invisible creature is there. Effectively, you are spending a standard action to "brandish" your weapon at nothing in particular, but keep it active so you can defend yourself. Arguably, you could also attack defensively while doing so and get additional defense, but you're not going Total Defense so you still get to make AoOs (though the penalty for both CE and defensive would apply). Honestly, I would have made it such that such a brandishing move is a move action rather than standard; spend a move action to gain the effect as if you had used the Attack action to fight defensively, but you aren't targeting anyone.


Then there's the issue that Combat Expertise gives you a dodge bonus, which doesn't apply when you're flat footed.

Unless he has Uncanny Dodge, it wouldn't work anyway.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Ravingdork wrote:

Did he declare who was attacking? He could attack a clump of grass and still benefit from Combat Expertise.

A designer said something to that effect long ago, during the 3.5 days I think.

That's the designer. If you're not engaging in real earnest combat, the feat doesn't kick in... at least not on my table.

Sovereign Court

i agree with lazarX. i cant stand these "picking" like attacking a clump of grass or just an invisible foe.
otherwise if you could do like that it could just prompt to a rewrite of the feat.


Yeah, attacking non-existent enemies is just ridiculously metagamey.

Grand Lodge

The bonuses don't kick in until the action is taken so readying the action to fight defensively wouldn't work unless it was carrying over from a previous round.

Shadow fighting an imaginary target seems legit to me as it is a declared (spent) action. It is essentially a weapon flourish and declaration to be on guard (like total defense with less return). My halfling bodyguard uses it since total defense removes my ability to make the aoo's needed to use the feat.

Otherwise he is a bodyguard that is always caught off guard unless he charges into a fray and abandoning his squishy companions.


Are you guys serious? You've never seen anyone go through a weapon forms kata, or a martial arts demonstration with no opponent?

Sovereign Court

beside the readying action component, what i am trying to figure out is if i can use it or not if i dont attack nothing/attack the empty space in front of me

also, i think that if you want use a defensive action, you can just adopt "fight defensively" or "full defense"(not requiring any kind of declaration, those 2 are actually a declaration for themselves)

since combat expertise is an action to be performed with an attack declaration (rules) we should try to define what is an attack declaration (and i didnt found nothing about this..):

1) so i could declare "i am going to attack", not specifying who/what and just kick in the CE feat

2) or i could declare "I am going to attack", not specifying who/what and if nothing shows up, i can attack thin air (kickin in the CE feat)

3) or, third, i can declare "i am going to attack" and need to attack effectively someone/something

Grand Lodge

My bad, I got off course since I only use combat expertise when already fighting defensively.

I would adjudicate it the exact same way as fighting defensively.
You must attack something since the ac is contingent on the - to hit.
You can ready an action to attack with it but the ac don't factor in until the attack is made so you are better off attacking the air or going total defense.

In short, you made the right call. Readying an action comes at a cost. If the required conditions don't come up, it never goes off. He could have declared total defense or attacked an empty square w/Fighting Def & CE if all he wanted was the AC.


Grey_Mage wrote:
My bad, I got off course since I only use combat expertise when already fighting defensively.

Thank you for mentioning that!

I had misremembered the restriction from Total Defense ("You can't combine total defense with fighting defensively or with the benefit of the Combat Expertise feat") and was incorrectly applying that to my characters that fight defensively.

This changes everything! Well, my AC at any rate. :-)

Shadow Lodge

Personally, I would consider Combat Expertise to be active from the point at which you ready an action to make a melee attack. This is based on how I interpret the spirit of the rule.

I believe that the reason Combat Expertise functions only when declaring an attack is to prevent someone from benefiting from Combat Expertise while doing something other than attacking in melee, such as casting a spell or using a supernatural ability.

If you ready a melee attack, you are not doing anything other than attacking in melee. You might not actually get the attack (as is the risk with readied actions) but you are committed to melee combat, and if you declare that you are using Combat Expertise from the point at which you ready the attack you have committed to a defensive strategy. You are taking a combat stance that is well suited to defense, and have a melee weapon prepared to ward off attack.


I could have sworn there was a paizo staff response that stated you must have a real target to employ fighting defensively or combat expertise, but my google-fu is failing me.

This is a rules question that comes up quite often, in any case.

Grand Lodge

_Ozy_ wrote:

Are you guys serious? You've never seen anyone go through a weapon forms kata, or a martial arts demonstration with no opponent?

That's exercise and/or showmanship, not a battle for your life.


And I suppose you are a martial arts master?

Please explain the difference between attacking a square with an invisible person and one without.

Sovereign Court

the problem isnt attacking one square with someone in or not
is attacking a square (space)
if you are interacting with yourself alone (kata) you arent actually fighting nothing
if there is an opponent, it's a complete different thing
this is why in martial arts you have both kind of competitions
kata's and kumite.


And for Pathfinder flavor purposes, choose whichever you think best represents the idea of defending yourself from a fictional attacker in such a way that other real attacks against you are more difficult to make.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / combat expertise and declaring actions All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.