Ranger with wildshape instead of animal companion advice


Advice


Hi all,

I'm going with a new character concept. It's inspired by the Disney movie Brother bear... I like to make a ranger which can change into a bear. I would like to hear your thoughts about the following idea:

The ranger drops it's animal companion, instead he gets wild shape like the druid ability but only to change into bear shapes (according to when they become available like the normal rules). The number of times and duration is also all the same as if the ranger levels were druid levels. The rest of the character is just according to the ranger rule set.

Do you think this is overpowered or underpowered? Do you advice another approach to the concept? I'm curious about what you guys and girls think :-)


I will actually suggest you to convert the 3.5 Bear Warrior to pathfinder. It does not need much work, just ignore the rage/1 day and possibly replace it with a rage power instead.

You will essentially trade rage powers for better bonuses when raging and improved grab on your attack. Seems balanced to me. I would probably dip only for 1 or 5 lvls though.

Use the Wild Stalker archetype.


Seems like a prestige class?? I don't really like to multiclass.. But thanks for the suggestion anyway :-) did not know it excisted :-)


Crimlock NL wrote:
Seems like a prestige class?? I don't really like to multiclass.. But thanks for the suggestion anyway :-) did not know it excisted :-)

It is a PrC. But, in case you do not want to multiclass, you can homebrew some changes in the wild stalker ranger, so that you can fit in the bear shapechanging.

For example:

Instead of spells, you get:

-4th lvl: Scent
-8th lvl: Bear Form (black)
-12th lvl: Bear form (brown)
-17th lvl: Bear form (dire)


Why not play a Druid with the Bear Shaman archetype?

Dark Archive

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

To echo Zhayne - what about the original made you decide the character should be a ranger? Was it something to do with the ranged combat style, or something else specific to ranger? Is it actually something a Druid can't do for some reason?

But back to your original question...the normal Animal Companion for a Ranger is a lower level effect than the Druid Animal Companion. So, assuming Animal Companion and Wildshape are about the same value, you would need to lower the effective level of Wildshape to match. Wildshape itself kicks in for the Druid at level 4, meaning for this Ranger, it wouldn't be available until level 8. I suspect that isn't what you want...

Lantern Lodge

Zhayne wrote:
Why not play a Druid with the Bear Shaman archetype?

This is what I basically did in Serpent's Skull (except I played a Lion Shaman). You take 1 level of Ranger and the rest as Druid (Bear Shaman). You take SHAPESHIFTING HUNTER so your Druid levels count as Ranger levels for the purposes of Favored Enemy (and Ranger Levels count as Druid levels for #/day you can Shapeshift). I also recommend PLANAR WILDSHAPE to help with DR issues and to make you tougher. NATURAL SPELL and WILD SPEECH are good too, especially if you stay in your beast form 24 hours a day (as I did towards the end of the campaign). The Magical Knack trait helps offset the 1 Caster Level lost, but that lost level will always be a little bit of an annoyance.

You could go 2 levels of Ranger to get the Natural Weapon combat style feat, but I don't consider it worth it because it hurts your spellcasting and, more importantly, delays your Shapeshifting.

I choose to take the Nobility Domain rather than an Animal Companion, but you could be a Bear Shaman with a Bear Companion. Mostly depends on whether you want to run a second creature, or simply your preference.

Another variation is to pick up feats to make him a decent summoner, and have summoning bears as a second trick (in addition to the Shapeshifting).

EDIT - And it's all RAW, so no need to ask your GM to make special dispensations for you, or to alter the Ranger class.


The problem with the bear shaman is that it sucks. Unless you intend to play up to 6 lvl or so. Allowing to use templates to increase the size and power of the dire bear extends its viability for a couple of lvls.

If you do decide to follow that route, multiclassing with a Tetori monk will let you take better advantage of your grab ability.

I would probably go as far as suggesting to take only two lvls of bear shaman druid and the rest to be a tetori monk. With shaping focus, at 6th lvl you will be able to wildshape into a dire bear and use the grab special ability. It is a waste of resourses though, as Tetori already takes the grab ability by 8th lvl.

Using the bear warrior for multicalssing or converting the ranger will probably give a more desirable outcome.


Thanks for the input so far!

My reason to play a ranger is that I like the idea to mix the bow and arrow with sword play.. think Legolas. A druid can't pull this of like a ranger can I think. I have never tried to build a sword fighting druid :-)... don't know if it is wise...

The bear shape is part combat and part roleplay flavour.
I thought about multiclassing a druid with a ranger. It would be something like this:

An half elf, multiclass druid/trapper ranger.
Half elf for the 2 favored classes, low light vision and elven imunities.
Druid up to a minimum of L9 so you get level 5 spells and wild shape (with all Beast shape options open).
The Ranger trapper because I think that placing traps is cool :-) and the trapfinding is a nice bonus which i really like. Also the ranger fits nice with the druid with the new feats Shapeshifting hunter and Shaping focus.

I prefer to play a non-multiclass character thought, and a straight ranger would be stronger in combat I think...

Scarab Sages

Well, there is the Shapeshifter Ranger You don't actually shapeshift until 20, but you can take an aspect of the bear for a big boost to STR. Unfortunately, it forced you into the the natural weapon combat style.


If not from class, you could be bearlike from the race, be a Skinwalker Coldborn (Werebear-kin)from Blood of the Moon.


Thanks all for the suggestions! The coldborn sounds cool, maybe i can find something in the book about shape shifting like i want to..

Can a wish give a ranger the ability to change into a bear at will? Just a thought :-)

Do you think it would be overpowerd if a ranger would get one shape and progress like a Druids wild shape? Dropping the animal companion..


If your GM allows it, what about a werebear?


A wish could transform the individual into a natural werebear.


Paladin of Baha-who? wrote:
A wish could transform the individual into a natural werebear.

A wish granted by a devil...who will collect at later date. And it has a big price tag.


Well... 3.5 had a variant...

Wildshape ranger:
Ranger

A ranger might forgo training in weapon combat in exchange for the ability to take animal form and move swiftly through the woodlands.

Gain
Wild shape (as druid; Small or Medium animals only), fast movement (as barbarian).

Lose
Combat style, improved combat style, combat style mastery.


With a little tinkering it may work for your concept and your story teller might allow it.

Liberty's Edge

You might also want to check out the New Paths Compendium from Kobold Press.

It has the Skin-Changer which is an alternate spell-less ranger and I think it might be exactly what you are looking for ;)


Just bought the book from kobold press, it is very nice!!! The ranger is just what i was looking for! Thanks very much for the tip!

The 3.5 version could also be a option, to bad that with both you lose a lot of feats..

Werebear would be sweet... But where do you find a wish when you need one :-)

Liberty's Edge

Crimlock NL wrote:
Just bought the book from kobold press, it is very nice!!! The ranger is just what i was looking for! Thanks very much for the tip!

No problem - glad you like it!

If you're so inclined, why not post a review in the actual product forum? :)


Tl:Dr will come back

Why not take aspect of the beast, and flavor it to be more bear-looking?

Ranger with wildshape is broken-
natural weapon fighting as an animal is ubsurdly powerful at low levels (until 7-8 or so)

Why not just dip Druid, and take the feat where ranger levels count as Druid for wild-shapes per day?

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Advice / Ranger with wildshape instead of animal companion advice All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.