Eyes of the Ten Retirement


Pathfinder Society

1 to 50 of 124 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>
Silver Crusade 1/5

Is the Eyes of the Ten going to be Retired ? John and Mike if it is could you issue errata for scenarios in seasons 0-2 eliminating

:
Adril Hestrom and replacing this Despicable traitors name with that of nother VC]

Grand Lodge 4/5

As far as I know, there are no plans to retire the arc.

5/5

The rumor got started when someone asked if it would be, and Mike said it wouldn't happen before the end of 2013, and wouldn't happen without 4-6 months of warning.

Since then, people have acted as though it was announced that the arc would retire 4-6 months after the start of 2014.

5/5 5/55/55/5

It was discussed during the "which factions are dying" podcast IIRC. They;'re going to have the replacement in place first though.

Shadow Lodge 3/5

The thing about retiring Eyes of the Ten, especially in contrast to retiring First Steps 2 and 3, is that everyone talks about how it's an amazing series and everyone wants to play it - so people need to race to get a character to level 12, which isn't trivial.

Even then, you need to find 3 other people who have done the same thing, in the same locale (or online), and a GM willing to run it.

So if it's really getting retired, we want to be racing now.

Shadow Lodge 5/5

Disclaimer
THIS IS ONLY A GUESS - CONJECTURE - AND SPECULATION

My Guess ... is that if it gets Retired ... it will be when it would hurt the campaign the least

My guess is that will be at the Start of Season 6 - at GenCon

therefore I would guess an announcement would come in February

Grand Lodge 4/5 5/5 *

I'll bet..WHENEVER they retire it, they will have the replacement FULLY done up first.

And yeah, they'll tell it's coming a ways off I imagine. I got to do it for my Wizard and I've promised a local group if they got enough folks I'd GM it.

Silver Crusade 5/5

7 people marked this as a favorite.

I for one hope it doesn't get retired. What harm would there be if there were two "seeker" arcs?

Grand Lodge 4/5

My Holy Vindicator will be ready for it next month, and we should be getting a table together soon after.


Myles Crocker wrote:
I for one hope it doesn't get retired. What harm would there be if there were two "seeker" arcs?

Paralyzing indecision created by having to choose between two amazing choices? At least until you race your 2nd level 12....

The Exchange 4/5 5/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

OK, I realize it's spoilered in the initial post, but that is SUCH a massive spoiler that I wish someone could go back and change the text to something like:

Spoiler:
Eliminate references to a specific creature that no longer make sense given its antagonistic role in Eyes of the Ten?

FYI, the answer is almost certainly that the scenarios won't be updated. (See other threads about why season 0 scenarios have not been updated from 3.5 to PFS rules.)

Grand Lodge 5/5

I hope it doesnt get retired just because the story is awesome.

The Exchange 5/5

MrSin wrote:
Myles Crocker wrote:
I for one hope it doesn't get retired. What harm would there be if there were two "seeker" arcs?
Paralyzing indecision created by having to choose between two amazing choices? At least until you race your 2nd level 12....

it is a problem having to choise between which of my characters I wanted to run thru it... (eye roll)...

but then, having two "seeker" arcs wouldn't help all that much, 'cause I'd have to decide which character I would run in which one... and there would only be two!

5/5 5/55/55/5

nosig wrote:
MrSin wrote:
Myles Crocker wrote:
I for one hope it doesn't get retired. What harm would there be if there were two "seeker" arcs?
Paralyzing indecision created by having to choose between two amazing choices? At least until you race your 2nd level 12....

it is a problem having to choise between which of my characters I wanted to run thru it... (eye roll)...

but then, having two "seeker" arcs wouldn't help all that much, 'cause I'd have to decide which character I would run in which one... and there would only be two!

Play twice run twice, that will get 1/4 of your characters through :)

The Exchange 5/5

BigNorseWolf wrote:
nosig wrote:
MrSin wrote:
Myles Crocker wrote:
I for one hope it doesn't get retired. What harm would there be if there were two "seeker" arcs?
Paralyzing indecision created by having to choose between two amazing choices? At least until you race your 2nd level 12....

it is a problem having to choise between which of my characters I wanted to run thru it... (eye roll)...

but then, having two "seeker" arcs wouldn't help all that much, 'cause I'd have to decide which character I would run in which one... and there would only be two!

Play twice run twice, that will get 1/4 of your characters through :)

LOL! yeah, but which ones do I run in which arch?!

5/5

I'm just not clear why we have to retire it at all, even if another one gets published.

5/5 5/55/55/5

Patrick Harris @ MU wrote:
I'm just not clear why we have to retire it at all, even if another one gets published.

The metaplot is pretty heavily bound up in season 2. You can Hotwire it to any season/timeline you want with minimul effort though.

3/5

Eyes of the Ten was written during the Josh Frost era. I could see retiring it because of Part IV alone, the other parts to a lesser extent, because of the big reveals about the Society perhaps conflicting with the current leadership's version of the Society.

On top of that, Eyes's CRs don't match up with the power-crept six-player assumption of today's tables, and it has faction missions.

-Matt

5/5

BigNorseWolf wrote:
The metaplot is pretty heavily bound up in season 2.

Every scenario is bound up in its era's metaplot, though. By the time you've got L12 characters, you're almost certainly going to be familiar with the metaplots of past seasons, I should hope.

Grand Lodge 4/5

I think the meta plots I'm unfamiliar with at this point are Season 0 and 1. Mostly because I haven't played enough to determine if there IS one.

Shadow Lodge 4/5 5/5 RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 8

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Mattastrophic wrote:

Eyes of the Ten was written during the Josh Frost era. I could see retiring it because of Part IV alone, the other parts to a lesser extent, because of the big reveals about the Society perhaps conflicting with the current leadership's version of the Society.

On top of that, Eyes's CRs don't match up with the power-crept six-player assumption of today's tables, and it has faction missions.

-Matt

I hope it gets retired. Then I can run it for my players for no credit and adjust the CRs accordingly.

Sovereign Court 4/5

Same here, TOZ. To my mind it's more "Hey! This happened, go do this!" Sure there are recurring characters and the like, but nothing really unified. At least until they start misbehaving in Season 2.

Mattastrophic wrote:
On top of that, Eyes's CRs don't match up with the power-crept six-player assumption of today's tables, and it has faction missions.

Which is why I see many people limiting the table to four slots.

Lantern Lodge 3/5

Mattastrophic wrote:
On top of that, Eyes's CRs don't match up with the power-crept six-player assumption of today's tables, and it has faction missions.

This is true. A community project to give it a little beefing up for funsies could be a really cool project, though.

Grand Lodge 4/5

Walter Sheppard wrote:
I hope it gets retired. Then I can run it for my players for no credit and adjust the CRs accordingly.

Why wait?

5/5

Walter Sheppard wrote:
I hope it gets retired. Then I can run it for my players for no credit and adjust the CRs accordingly.

You can do that right now.

Shadow Lodge 4/5 5/5 RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 8

Patrick Harris @ MU wrote:
Walter Sheppard wrote:
I hope it gets retired. Then I can run it for my players for no credit and adjust the CRs accordingly.
You can do that right now.

Except people that haven't experienced it already will want to play it for credit. And you cannot adjust the CR when you run it for credit.

If it gets retired, then when my newer players hit 12, I can run them through it for their first time, and make it as challenging as needed.

3/5

Walter Sheppard wrote:
Except people that haven't experienced it already will want to play it for credit.

I had this same problem a lot. I had all sorts of ideas of how to provide a good experience for my players, but they just wanted sanctioned credit.

-Matt

5/5 5/55/55/5

I thought the fights were looking a little easy.

5/5

Walter Sheppard wrote:
Patrick Harris @ MU wrote:
Walter Sheppard wrote:
I hope it gets retired. Then I can run it for my players for no credit and adjust the CRs accordingly.
You can do that right now.

Except people that haven't experienced it already will want to play it for credit. And you cannot adjust the CR when you run it for credit.

If it gets retired, then when my newer players hit 12, I can run them through it for their first time, and make it as challenging as needed.

Yeah, that's fair.

4/5

I've only been through the first fight (or two, depending on how you count), but it seems like the challenge factor wasn't exactly low for those, and we blew through almost all our high level spells.

Shadow Lodge 4/5 5/5 RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 8

David_Bross wrote:
I've only been through the first fight (or two, depending on how you count), but it seems like the challenge factor wasn't exactly low for those, and we blew through almost all our high level spells.

When you hit level 13 before the last parts, it's a noticeable power jump when you get 7th level spells and BAB 12+ required feats on your melee types. Raging Brutality is pretty stupid good.

3/5

Eyes was awesome. Should I ever get 4 stars (HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! HOOO! /coughcough That's rich. /wipestear Heh. Heheh. /clearsthroat) I'd love to replay that. Probably my most memorable experience in PFS.

Grand Lodge 4/5

My wife is playing through it this month, and so far the first two parts have nearly killed multiple characters.

Liberty's Edge 5/5

The only issue with Eyes is hat it is written for characters who played seasons 0 and 1 mostly. Retired PC's who started characters from the UC and UM, have shown some power game which isn't their fault those books just allow allot of cheese. Despite this it run's well for a 6 player table despte being written for 4, just don't run 7 it will go longer and not be nearly as much fun.

Liberty's Edge 5/5

Oh and as far as retiring the scenario, stop sweating iit isn't going to happen anytime soon. Just as anyone with the stars to do so run it when you get players, this is a present to those who have stuck it out with PFS. Prep it and run it well.

The Exchange 4/5

I think it holds up well to newer characters, as long as there are only 4 of them :-p


Myles Crocker wrote:

I for one hope it doesn't get retired. What harm would there be if there were two "seeker" arcs?

These are my feelings as well. I have more than one character I would like to go through the retirement arc, I see no reason why you can't have more than one.

The Exchange 5/5 RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16

6 people marked this as a favorite.

When Erik Mona can fit another double-length scenario into his writing schedule, that's when I'd like to see talk about a replacement Seeker arc and possible retirement of Eyes.

Grand Lodge 4/5

I'd like to see two double-length scenarios in the new arc. Take 'em from 12th to 14th.

Paizo Employee 4/5 Developer

1 person marked this as a favorite.
TriOmegaZero wrote:
I'd like to see two double-length scenarios in the new arc. Take 'em from 12th to 14th.

As in two double-length scenarios and two single-length? Just two double-length scenarios and nothing else? It's already pretty difficult for me to get through the whole story in one marathon weekend!

Shadow Lodge 4/5 5/5 RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 8

John Compton wrote:
TriOmegaZero wrote:
I'd like to see two double-length scenarios in the new arc. Take 'em from 12th to 14th.
As in two double-length scenarios and two single-length? Just two double-length scenarios and nothing else? It's already pretty difficult for me to get through the whole story in one marathon weekend!

When Big K ran it for us I think we broke the 40 hour mark over a long weekend--or at least I have over 40 hours of audio recordings of it!

Shadow Lodge 4/5

John Compton wrote:
TriOmegaZero wrote:
I'd like to see two double-length scenarios in the new arc. Take 'em from 12th to 14th.
As in two double-length scenarios and two single-length?

That's correct. And your difficulty sounds like a personal problem. :)

Note: The above is based on no experience with the current arc and should be taken aa serious development advice at your own risk.

Silver Crusade 5/5

Well I have been fortunate enough to have played through Eyes of the ten, in late 2012, and now I have an opportunity to re-play through Eyes of the Ten now.

The first character I played through eyes of the ten had all season 0 and Season 1 scenarios. I was lucky enough to play with a GM, and two other players whose characters i had leveled my character up with, the other two players I knew, but my character hadn't adventured with thier characters before. their characters had adventured together before. We also played at the GM's home.

For us it was a very hard slog, we had a human Wizard Evoker, a human Cleric/Sorcerer split equally, a arcane archer (Ranger/Wizard/Arcane Archer) a Fighter specialized in archery who could be a meat shield, and my character, a Cleric/ Wizard/ Mystic Theurge. We pulled together and got through. We had fun.

My character because of the scenarios he had played through, dovetailed very nicely into the plot of Eyes of the ten.

Our present group consists of a Barbarian ( with some sort of dragon archtype) an inquisitor of Asmodeus, a ranger/rogue, a Mystic Theurge ( Druid/wizard/mystic theurge and my character a magus 10/arcane archer 2.

So far we have done fine. It hasn't been a big problem that my character doesn't have very many season 0 or 1 chronicles in his background. We are enjoying things so far.

I do hope that we can keep Eyes of the Ten.

Grand Lodge 2/5 RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

1 person marked this as a favorite.

We only need to keep EotT long enough for me to complete it. ;)

The Exchange 5/5

Well ...

I have completed this adventure ... it was hard, yet hard indeed ... BUT I saw lots of big stuffs and I got some talking shrunken head puppets .. so it was alllll worth it...

[ooc] pulls out her shrunken head marionettes and starts playing with them[/ooc

Grand Lodge 4/5 5/55/5

Mattastrophic wrote:
On top of that, Eyes's CRs don't match up with the power-crept six-player assumption of today's tables, and it has faction missions.

I can see what you mean if it was a normal scenario, but I don't see a full group of six players with 12th level characters at any of the cons that I have been to that it was run at.

Maybe I'm just in the wrong part of the country and there are a ton of EotT tables with six players on them, but I haven't seen it.

1/5 **

TriOmegaZero wrote:
My Holy Vindicator will be ready for it next month, and we should be getting a table together soon after.

I'd be interested in playing (or GMing) that...drop me a line if it firms up.

The Exchange 4/5

Gencon struggled to make a table this year.

I will be running this marathon of an event, broken up by only Siege of the Diamond City at winterwar.

I asked to run high Tier for Siege as well, a true test of my mental stamina :D

Grand Lodge 4/5

bugleyman wrote:
TriOmegaZero wrote:
My Holy Vindicator will be ready for it next month, and we should be getting a table together soon after.
I'd be interested in playing (or GMing) that...drop me a line if it firms up.

We've already got two volunteers for GM from the current run going on. I'd be glad to have you on the team. :)

Benrislove wrote:
I asked to run high Tier for Siege as well, a true test of my mental stamina :D

Having run both 10-11 and 12-13 subtiers, let me know if you have any questions. :)

1 to 50 of 124 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Organized Play / Pathfinder Society / Eyes of the Ten Retirement All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.