Undead Monk + Perfect Self


Rules Questions


Alright, here is the question I have:

Let's say you are a Vampire (or any other undead monk), and then you reach level 20 and get perfect self.

So you are undead, and gain some outsiders thing, especially that part:

"She is forevermore treated as an outsider rather than as a humanoid (or whatever the monk’s creature type was) for the purpose of spells and magical effects"

So what does that mean exactly? Are you not vulnerable to undead specific spells anymore?
Can you still be healed by Negative energy?
Does Paladin Smite good does double damage to you on its first attack?

What exactly change or doesn't?

Lantern Lodge

You would probably have to go into the epic levels to do that, level 21+, because going vampire gives you a racial HD or two (I think...) Double check that.

RAW, it'd get complicated, because your a magical beast and undead, or one of those two. Vampires can be made from monstrous humanoids, but that type is replaced when they become a vampire.

If they stack, I'd say that you gain the effects of everything, so you'd still be subject to double damage unless it specifically said it doesn't effect outsiders, because you follow the most specific rule (In this case, the fact it deals double damage to undead).

Same with any other spell.

Hope that helps.


You know, that makes me think there must be room for an undead-themed monk archetype. That way the capstone could make you undead with a twist, similar to the immortal capstone some other monk archetypes have - rather than reincarnating, you become a lich and can regenerate yourself through a phylactery...

Grand Lodge

Lauraliane wrote:

Alright, here is the question I have:

Let's say you are a Vampire (or any other undead monk), and then you reach level 20 and get perfect self.

So you are undead, and gain some outsiders thing, especially that part:

"She is forevermore treated as an outsider rather than as a humanoid (or whatever the monk’s creature type was) for the purpose of spells and magical effects"

So what does that mean exactly? Are you not vulnerable to undead specific spells anymore?
Can you still be healed by Negative energy?
Does Paladin Smite good does double damage to you on its first attack?

What exactly change or doesn't?

It actually means less for you than it would for a human monk. You get outsider related immunities to things such as Charm Person,Hold Person (Also Enlarge/Reduce btw), spells that particualarly target Humanoids. Perfect Self does not address your udead aspects at all. So yes you can still be healed by Negative Energy and Smited by Paladins as those effects aren't limited to targeting humanoids.


PRD wrote:
Perfect Self: At 20th level, a monk becomes a magical creature. This seems like a fluff line. He is forevermore treated as an outsider (crunch) rather than as a humanoid (or whatever the monk's creature type was) for the purpose of spells and magical effects. (also crunch) Additionally, the monk gains damage reduction 10/chaotic, which allows him to ignore the first 10 points of damage from any attack made by a nonchaotic weapon or by any natural attack made by a creature that doesn't have similar damage reduction. Unlike other outsiders, the monk can still be brought back from the dead as if he were a member of his previous creature type. (crunch)

I emphasized pertinent fluff and crunch lines. "...becomes a magical creature" is just unfortunate flavorful language that happens to conflate with an actual creature type, Magical Beast (not the subtle difference). However, there's a slight issue here; both the Vampire template and the Perfect Self ability change your base creature type. Which one takes precedence? Does an Outsider qualify for the Vampire template? Or does becoming an Outsider remove the Vampire template effect? Or does the Outsider type simply subvert the Undead type and you have all the functional abilities of a Vampire, but you're no longer considered Undead? Or do the two creature types coexist?


My initial interpretation is that, RAW, you are no longer undead for purposes of spells or effects. So if the reason something would have a given effect on you is that you're undead, it wouldn't have that effect anymore.

This seems really surprising, though.

Liberty's Edge

If you're no longer an undead, what happens with your non-existent constitution? Wouldn't it just kill you? Also, back in 3.5 (and maybe in Pathfinder even) weren't there undead outsiders?


Dabbler wrote:
You know, that makes me think there must be room for an undead-themed monk archetype. That way the capstone could make you undead with a twist, similar to the immortal capstone some other monk archetypes have - rather than reincarnating, you become a lich and can regenerate yourself through a phylactery...

Hungry Ghost Monk?


Kazumetsa wrote:
Dabbler wrote:
You know, that makes me think there must be room for an undead-themed monk archetype. That way the capstone could make you undead with a twist, similar to the immortal capstone some other monk archetypes have - rather than reincarnating, you become a lich and can regenerate yourself through a phylactery...
Hungry Ghost Monk?

I was thinking something more....undeady. Sort of like a necromancer path monk, if you get my meaning.


Dabbler wrote:
Kazumetsa wrote:
Dabbler wrote:
You know, that makes me think there must be room for an undead-themed monk archetype. That way the capstone could make you undead with a twist, similar to the immortal capstone some other monk archetypes have - rather than reincarnating, you become a lich and can regenerate yourself through a phylactery...
Hungry Ghost Monk?
I was thinking something more....undeady. Sort of like a necromancer path monk, if you get my meaning.

Aaahhh. I got you. I'm sure some more archetypes for the monk wouldn't hurt :)*envelopes self in wishful thinking*


This is an odd situation. For the record, Vampires do not gain racial HD. They get a CR increase, but no racial HD. So FrodoOf9Fingers is incorrect that this would require breaching level 20.

I'd argue that they are no longer undead, since the class ability came after the vampire turn - a 20th level monk who is turned would become undead (augmented outsider) instead of outsider. But in becoming an outsider, they'd presumably be resurrected - regaining their Con score, for one. Oddly, many of the abilites of the vampire template are implied to be because of the type change to undead, but don't actually say that. So they'd still use Cha instead of Con for bonus hp, for example.


I look at it that you should apply the template affect afterwards, or else you should gain no benefit from the template at all. So in essence, you have a 20th level monk, and then apply the Vampire template. Seems to be the most logical way to do it.

So a human monk would have started life as a humanoid(human). At 20th level his type changes essentially to outsider(native) (like Aasimar). Then apply the Vampire template and you have undead(augmented outsider(native)).

Makes sense to me.


I think I am leaning towards the theory that regardless of the order in which you acquire the traits, templates are applied on top of your other traits.


Monks don't actually become Outsiders, they're just treated as Outsiders for the purposes of spells and effects.

An Undead Monk is no different. You still have the Undead type, but for spells (like Cure Light Wounds) that work differently for Outsiders as they do Undead, you're treated as an Outsider not an Undead. Similarly, for effects (like Channel Energy or Smite Evil) that work differently for Outsiders as they do Undead, you're treated as an Outsider not an Undead.

For other things not spells or effects, like not having a CON score, you're still an Unead, so they're not an issue.


Claxon wrote:

I look at it that you should apply the template affect afterwards, or else you should gain no benefit from the template at all. So in essence, you have a 20th level monk, and then apply the Vampire template. Seems to be the most logical way to do it.

So a human monk would have started life as a humanoid(human). At 20th level his type changes essentially to outsider(native) (like Aasimar). Then apply the Vampire template and you have undead(augmented outsider(native)).

Makes sense to me.

What about a Ghoul or Mummy, or other non-templated Undead?

Should they be any different than templated Undead?


Those are two very good points.


seebs wrote:
I think I am leaning towards the theory that regardless of the order in which you acquire the traits, templates are applied on top of your other traits.

Templates have always been strict about application. A set of templates applied in one way works, that same set of templates applied in another way invalidates some templates.

In a situation like this, the template exists and later the class grants some abilities which may or may not seem worth it or do anything because of the template. Redundancy happens in this game.


Very curious corner case that's come up in my own theory crafting with Mythic Vampires this morning. My personal interpretation is that they wouldn't cease being undead, merely be treated as Outsiders for those kind of effects.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Undead Monk + Perfect Self All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.