| Lobolusk |
| 1 person marked this as FAQ candidate. 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
DO pinning Rend and Pinning Knock out stack?
My new character has about every grappling related feat possible. When I make a grapple and deal damage do I deal both? or choose which one?
Stunning pin: says I can a swift action to make a stunning fist attack. I this different then a normal Stunning fist attempt? that can only be made once a round?
and Jaw breaker and Bone breaker do they stack? can I apply both condidtions? to my attack while grappling?
| Rathyr |
1. I'd say no.
Pinning Rend deals bleed damage equal to your unarmed DICE.
Pinning Knockout deals double your damage RESULT in nonlethal damage. Your actual unarmed dice hasn't increased.
2. Stunning Pin doesn't make a whole lot of sense. First of all, its a joke that you have to use a swift action, when the original doesn't require an action at all. Second of all, a stunning first "attempt" is declared before you make an unarmed strike, which makes ZERO sense when used AFTER a pin. You can... infer... that what you should be doing is treating it as if you had just hit with an unarmed strike, but yes, it would be treated like an regular stunning fist attempt in that you cant do it multiple times.
Honestly though, you can only use that attempt when you PIN an opponent. There's no point to applying pin more than once. If you have extra grapple attempts after pinning, its better to pin them once, than either tie them up or damage them.
3. No. Both require you to choose to give up the stunning fist effect. You can't give up the regular stunning fist effect twice.
Bruno Breakbone
|
PINNING REND: While you have an opponent pinned, when you succeed at a grapple combat maneuver check to deal an opponent damage using an unarmed strike or a light or one-handed weapon, that opponent also takes bleed damage equal to your unarmed strike or weapon damage dice. Any creature that is immune to critical hits is immune to the effects of this feat.
Pinning KO only triggers on nonlethal damage. Pinning Rend triggers on normal damage. While Bruno think you may get GM to allow Pinning KO's non-lethal damage to trigger Pinning Rend's lethal bleed damage, Bruno think you no have cake and eat it too.
STUNNING PIN: Whenever you pin an opponent, you can spend a swift action to make a Stunning Fist attempt against that opponent.
Stunning Fist normally part of your standard (or full round) attack action. When Bruno grappling, Bruno gain grappled condition which no allow standard attacks. Stunning Pin lets Bruno slip in Stunning Fist during grappling. Very handy in stupid, irritating casters with low Fort saves.
BONEBREAKER: When you make a successful Stunning Fist attempt against an opponent that is grappled, helpless, or stunned, you can forgo any other Stunning Fist effect to deal 1d6 Strength or Dexterity damage to that opponent.
These no stack. When you land your Stunning Fist, you have to choose which effect you would want on stupid monster.
Bruno now grapples your attention to fact Stunning Fist for Jawbreaker or Bonebreaker not need to be on stupid monster you are personally grappling--you can Stunning Fist into Jawbreaker/Bonebreaker any creature that has grappled, helpless or stunned condition.
Bruno head hurt from all the words.
| Rathyr |
Rapid Grappler lets you make another Grapple check after maintaining as a move action (from greater grapple).
In theory, you could do this.
Move action -> Maintain Grapple
Swift Action -> Maintain Grapple
No Action -> Stunning Fist
Standard Action -> Unarmed Strike
Note that you cannot use Stunning Pin and Swift Grappler in the same turn (both use swift actions).
Kord_Avatar
|
I'm also making a Tetori character, but i'm confused by the previous answer:
Move action -> Maintain Grapple
Swift Action -> Maintain Grapple
No Action -> Stunning Fist (?)
Standard Action -> Unarmed Strike
Why Stunning Fist would consume no actions? It was my impression that it was a swift action as a part of the Stunning Pin feat. Unless the Standard Action came first, make an unarmed attack and declare it a Stunning Fist.
Correct me if i'm mistaken, regards.
| Lobolusk |
After playing my new grapple character here is the skinny I assume you succeed at your grapple check each time.
Stunning fist inst an action but it must be declared in conjunction with an attack roll.
so standard action INITIATE the grapple
move action MAINTAIN the Grapple, choose to pin,move ,or damage
swift action Grapple check again then Pin, Move or damage
round 2
Move action Maintain the grapple ,then pin, move or Damage
Standard choose to Pin, move or damage
Swift action grapple check again because you used your Move action and then PIN, MOVE or DAMAGE.
any time you choose to roll unarmed damage you can make a stunning fist but
| Rathyr |
I'm also making a Tetori character, but i'm confused by the previous answer:
Move action -> Maintain Grapple
Swift Action -> Maintain Grapple
No Action -> Stunning Fist (?)
Standard Action -> Unarmed StrikeWhy Stunning Fist would consume no actions? It was my impression that it was a swift action as a part of the Stunning Pin feat. Unless the Standard Action came first, make an unarmed attack and declare it a Stunning Fist.
Correct me if i'm mistaken, regards.
In that example, you are not using Stunning Pin, you are using vanilla Stunning Fist (on an Unarmed Attack that follows). I put Stunning Fist before the Standard Action attack because you have to declare it before you make the attack. Sorry for the confusion.
Stunning Pin is a bad feat, and it should feel bad. It can be argued that you can use Stunning Fist *any* time you make an CMB roll (attack roll) to grapple and do damage, instead of wasting precious swift action economy.