So what's "better"? A straight summoner, synthesist, or brood master?


Advice

Liberty's Edge

I am starting a 1st level character in a 15 point buy game and I want to be a summoner but I can't decide which of the 3 above types to build so I'm asking advice which one is better and why? Also any build help will also be appreciated.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Master Summoner. 7 SLA summons at first level is powerful. Especially with an eidolon.

Liberty's Edge

Really it just depends what you're wanting. Master Summoner is nice, but so is straight summoner and I know synthesist has some very strong supporters (though I'm not one of them).

Broodmaster is less than excellent, IMO its good for certain builds (that generally use a lot of UMD wands) but that's about it.

Liberty's Edge

ShadowcatX wrote:

Really it just depends what you're wanting. Master Summoner is nice, but so is straight summoner and I know synthesist has some very strong supporters (though I'm not one of them).

Broodmaster is less than excellent, IMO its good for certain builds (that generally use a lot of UMD wands) but that's about it.

Okay but I was hoping for some builds also does anyone want to help with that?

Dark Archive

Tell us what you want your character to do, and post a rough build that you think accomplishes what you want. A lot more people are willing to give tips and critique, rather than just build a character for you.


Pathfinder Starfinder Society Subscriber

I think your decision is probably best based on what you want to focus on. I take it from the omission of Master Summoner that you want to focus on your eidolon(s) rather than your ability to summon monsters -- the master summoner is best for summoned monsters, but your eidolon is gimped for that purpose.

For the synthesist, your eidolon is basically a super powered suit that enables you to transform into a monster. It has the advantage of reducing the summoner's vulnerability (as he cannot be targeted separately from his eidolon) but limits your actions (as the eidolon is not a separate creature).

A straight summoner gives your eidolon the most power possible as a separate creature. Its strength is the ability of your summoner and your eidolon to each take their own actions. Its weakness (shared with all non-synthesist archetypes) is that the summoner can be targeted separately.

A broodmaster compromises the combat capability of your eidolon for an increased number of actions, so it is most useful if you want to focus on your separate eidolons being skill monkeys rather than combatants.

If you are new to the game, there is a note in Ultimate Magic that you may want to take to heart. The broodmaster and the master summoner can both give you an unwieldy number of creatures to control, which can make things tough for both you and the GM. It is much easier to take your turn in a timely manner when you have no more than two combatants under your control.


Grimmzorch wrote:
I am starting a 1st level character in a 15 point buy game and I want to be a summoner but I can't decide which of the 3 above types to build so I'm asking advice which one is better and why? Also any build help will also be appreciated.

I'd stay away from Broodmaster (and for that matter, Master Summoner) unless you've got a very small party. The number of actions you get as these archetypes is off-putting to the rest of the group.

Between synthesist and straight summoner:

Synthesist is best if you want a single super-powerful entity. You will act once per turn, but that action has all of the power behind both the summoner and the eidolon behind it.

Straight summoner is best if you want the most overall power. With this build, your Eidolon gets to play front-line fighter, while you Summoner plays battlefield-controller with spells. You get two actions per turn, and unlike the Synthesist, you 'll never have to choose between full attack OR spell casting, you get to do both every turn.


As cool as Broodmaster sounds I have yet to figure out how to make it work mechanically. Maybe with a heavy investment in teamwork feats or a few levels of inquisitor. Otherwise it's a lot of fluff and not much crunch.


Grimmzorch wrote:
I am starting a 1st level character in a 15 point buy game and I want to be a summoner but I can't decide which of the 3 above types to build so I'm asking advice which one is better and why? Also any build help will also be appreciated.

Depends on whatr you want:

Normal summoner:
Great casters and have a strong pet monster: arcane druids in essence (without wildshape).

Synthesist:
Strong transformation creature (not as good as caster unless Bi-pedal): He-man, Ultraman, Under Dog, Booger man (snot funny, huh)

Master Summoner: a normal Summoner, but can't call as strong as pet monster, but better summoning. Ash Kethcher, Monster Rancher,

Brood Master: Weaker Pet monsters (better for skills/UMD).


I love the synthesist, but I have been refraining form playing one since there are too many ambiguities that lead to confusion. If you are considering making a synthesist, I recommend to first read the UM FAQ to know what are the latest rulings

Liberty's Edge

So if it's down to regular summoner and synthesist which is better and why?


If you ever think you want to play a Synthesist, just play a Druid instead. Or even Barbarian.

Summoner >>>>>>>>>>>> Synthesist

More action economy, more build options, constant access to spellcasting


Grimmzorch wrote:
So if it's down to regular summoner and synthesist which is better and why?

Well, would you prefer to have a big nasty beast or would you prefer to be a big nasty beast?


Tiny Coffee Golem wrote:
Grimmzorch wrote:
So if it's down to regular summoner and synthesist which is better and why?
Well, would you prefer to have a big nasty beast or would you prefer to be a big nasty beast?

Why not play a Druid and have both?

Liberty's Edge

Tiny Coffee Golem wrote:
Grimmzorch wrote:
So if it's down to regular summoner and synthesist which is better and why?

Well, would you prefer to have a big nasty beast or would you prefer to be a big nasty beast? [/QUOTE/]

Well if I am in complete control of the big nasty beast then I guess I rather do whichever if more powerful/effective.

Race wise I'm considering 1/2 elf or Aasimar any suggestions there?


Grimmzorch wrote:
Tiny Coffee Golem wrote:
Grimmzorch wrote:
So if it's down to regular summoner and synthesist which is better and why?

Well, would you prefer to have a big nasty beast or would you prefer to be a big nasty beast? [/QUOTE/]

Well if I am in complete control of the big nasty beast then I guess I rather do whichever if morepiwerful/effective

I'd say play a standard summoner then. Action economy alone kicks serious butt. Plus if your eidion is killed you can start summoning monsters. Just be sure your summoner has something he can do, shoot a crossbow, a couple of offensive spells/wands, etc.


Cartigan wrote:
Tiny Coffee Golem wrote:
Grimmzorch wrote:
So if it's down to regular summoner and synthesist which is better and why?
Well, would you prefer to have a big nasty beast or would you prefer to be a big nasty beast?
Why not play a Druid and have both?

Because druids aren't the Guyver.

Straight summoners do have the advantage but I like my synthesists for what they can offer in terms of fun and combat. Plus it's very very hard to kill a synthesist.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Grimmzorch wrote:
So if it's down to regular summoner and synthesist which is better and why?

Its the summoner. Simple because of action economy. You effectively get 2 full round of actions each turn. 1 with a fairly effective melee combatant, 1 with a fairly effective arcane caster.

The synthesist on the other hand is a more effective melee combatant. Because it has more HP and doesn't have share magic item slots. And is just as effective an arcane caster. But it can't be both every round.

That said, Summoners can really dominate a table. Being a synthesist might be more socially acceptable for some tables.


Oh Joy, Cartigan is going to turn this thread into that annoying "Why play summoner when you can be a druid" thread.


Cheapy wrote:
Oh Joy, Cartigan is going to turn this thread into that annoying "Why play summoner when you can be a druid" thread.

Why play SYNTHESIST when you can play a Druid. Totally valid point and totally different than what you said.

Liberty's Edge

Cartigan wrote:
Cheapy wrote:
Oh Joy, Cartigan is going to turn this thread into that annoying "Why play summoner when you can be a druid" thread.
Why play SYNTHESIST when you can play a Druid. Totally valid point and totally different than what you said.

I'm definitely looking at a summoner of some type just not into Druids.

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Cartigan wrote:
Cheapy wrote:
Oh Joy, Cartigan is going to turn this thread into that annoying "Why play summoner when you can be a druid" thread.
Why play SYNTHESIST when you can play a Druid. Totally valid point and totally different than what you said.

Not even close to valid. Both can casts spells and transform into things, but that's really where the similarities end. You might as well say why play a witch when you could play a wizard, an oracle when you could play a cleric, etc.

Liberty's Edge

So help me to create the best summoner or synthesist I can on a 15 point buy.


Grimmzorch wrote:
So help me to create the best summoner or synthesist I can on a 15 point buy.

Summoners only actually need a 16 Charisma (Only get up to level 6 spells). Unlike other caster classes they don't actually rely on their casting stat, so you can effectively make a more rounded character without even trying to min max.

If you are playing as a human you can effectively buy a 14 CHA and bump it to 16 with the +2 human traits.

Give yourself some strength and dex. Strength to carry light armor, as your character is proficient with it, and dex for armor and ranged attacks. You will want a lot of constitution for hp and fort saves. You will want a decent Wisdom for fort saves. Hell, take a decent Int too because you only get 2+Int skills per level.

The only bad part about having a 16 Cha, is that you have less summon monster spell like ability casts per day, and maybe fewer extra spells that you can cast. In general, I have found that if I am relying on my summon monster SLA, something has gone very wrong in combat, or it is the morning and I don't want to use a level 2 spell to instantly summon the Eidolon.

Just keep in mind that you are not the star of the show, the eidolon is, so do what you can to get the eidolon better stats. Avoid the feat that says your Eidolon gets a +2 to one ability score for 10 minutes after you summon it. It is a horrible feat. It has been ruled that Augment Summoning only affects your summoned creatures but not the eidolon (Not even if you use the Summon Eidolon spell).

If you go natural attacks, for the eidolon, I recommend claw attacks, and the improved damage claw evolution followed by the Improved natural attack feat, which boosts claw damage from d4 to d6 to d8.

Alternatively:
If you make a multi-headed eidolon, you can give it enough bite attacks so that it will make a trip attack a number of times equal to its successful hits. Once the target is prone it is usually over.

Energy attacks is a great evolution, so are wings, and natural armor. If you make the eidolon skilled with use magic device he will have the best UMD in the entire group and you can give him a wand to use.

In short, the eidolon is incredibly versatile.

Liberty's Edge

If you go natural attacks, for the eidolon, I recommend claw attacks, and the improved damage claw evolution followed by the Improved natural attack feat, which boosts claw damage from d4 to d6 to d8.

Alternatively:
If you make a multi-headed eidolon, you can give it enough bite attacks so that it will make a trip attack a number of times equal to its successful hits. Once the target is prone it is usually over.

Are you sure that an eidolon can take monster feats by RAW/RAI?

Also how does having bite attacks get you trip attacks?


Grimmzorch wrote:


Also how does having bite attacks get you trip attacks?

Get the trip evolution. Works everytime you bite. Multiple heads, multiple bites, multiple trips. Make hima quadraped with pounce and you have the most awesoem hydra in the history of ever.

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

RAW there is nothing stopping anyways from taking any feat they meet the prerequisites for, even if that feat is in the bestiary.

Liberty's Edge

Eidolons in PFS are banned from taking Bestiary feats, by the specific rules of PFS. In general, it is allowed.

Dark Archive

Highest power is the Master Summoner. Of the ones you listed, straight summoner is the best; Broodmaster is bad, gives up too much. Synthesist is cool, but ultimately loses the component of bringing the tank and buffer in 1 package.


cfalcon wrote:
Eidolons in PFS are banned from taking Bestiary feats, by the specific rules of PFS. In general, it is allowed.

Why are Eidolons banned from taking Bestiary feats?

Not to open up an old can of worms, but Animal companions can, so why not Eidolons?


Mogart wrote:
cfalcon wrote:
Eidolons in PFS are banned from taking Bestiary feats, by the specific rules of PFS. In general, it is allowed.

Why are Eidolons banned from taking Bestiary feats?

Not to open up an old can of worms, but Animal companions can, so why not Eidolons?

Because the rules game is confusing and the Summoner specifically.


Cartigan wrote:


Because the rules game is confusing and the Summoner specifically.

I just want a big list of errata with the eidolon and the summoner in mind. I might make a new thread for it.

Liberty's Edge

Animals companions also cannot take Bestiary feats in PFS.

Exactly like Eidolons, they normally can (aka not in PFS). Like as in, if you are running a normal game, Bestiary feats will be available unless you choose to ban them- much as PFS has done.

If you are asking why as in, what rule bans it? Then check here:
http://paizo.com/pathfinderSociety/resources
Under Bestiary, feats:
"Feats: none of the feats are legal for play for PCs, animal companions, or familiars unless specifically granted by another legal source."

And there's somewhere else where Eidolons are subject to the same PFS level restrictions as "animal companions".

If you are asking why as in, for balance reasons? I can only speculate. Likely the feats are in some cases considered exploitable if used in a customizable fashion. Again, just a guess, however.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Advice / So what's "better"? A straight summoner, synthesist, or brood master? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.