
doctor_wu |

Hu5tru wrote:#1 None, but it is fun to read people's conjectures, especially the gentleman thief angle that is getting pushed... especially when we all know that rogues are shifty, unreliable, skeezy little ponces that no one in their right mind would slip into bed with.
'Frankly, my dear, I don't give a *darn*'
- Rhett Butler, Edited for content.Sean Connery, Lord Byron, Ernest Hemingway, Oscar Wilde, Socrates, Pablo Picasso, Humphrey Bogart, Clark Gable, Zorro, and Batman would all disagree.
And you should think twice about disagreeing with the Godam Batman.
But I thought wizards were batman. </derail>

WarColonel |

But I thought wizards were batman. </derail>
<derail> Batman has levels in which-ever class he needs, but for the Batman-style characters I've played, they've always been rogues with lots of mundane equipment, UMD maxed, and wands/potions/staves for any situation.</derail>
<rerail> Would only the basic archetypes be used? </rerail>

fluffsorcerer |
I don't think that we should dismiss wizards so readily. An enchanter will have a decent charisma score (unless his player is altogether silly) along with the intelligence to back it up. Here we have a suave, knowledgeable, mystical personality who can impress the ladies (or gentleman) with wondrous displays of erudition and magic tempered with tact, so as not to offend or bore the audience. Try, try, try to understand; he's a magic man. ;)

![]() |

I don't think that we should dismiss wizards so readily. An enchanter will have a decent charisma score (unless his player is altogether silly) along with the intelligence to back it up. Here we have a suave, knowledgeable, mystical personality who can impress the ladies (or gentleman) with wondrous displays of erudition and magic tempered with tact, so as not to offend or bore the audience. Try, try, try to understand; he's a magic man. ;)
To be fair, a wizard needs 2 stats to accomplish that and a sorc needs one. An Arcane bloodline sorc can even get the DC higher on the entire enchantment school, while an infernal bloodline could at least do so for the charm subschool (and get it earlier). Sorcs are just as capable of Spell Focus as anyone else.

Doomed Hero |

Paladin, all the way. Lawful Good doesn't have to mean chaste. My favorite paladin ever was the bouncer in a high-class brothel (who later went on to tackle a demi-god into a lava pit that had the Terrasque in it)
Nothing better than a doorman with Lay On Hands, Remove Disease and a +20 to Intimidate and Diplomacy.

WarColonel |

Alas, the view of many on this thread is that the only way to a woman's heart is through magic.
I'd say any class that relies on enchantment to get some is using coercive techniques. Illusion and transmutation would be all right.
Don't forget, though, spells have duration. Bluff and Diplomacy do not.

Richard Leonhart |

@ Valiant, no summons, else I use a wish for 45 willing women.
however if magic (like charm person) can't be used, skills should be disallowed too.
So what typical character has the most sex-appeal. I would think the bard has a pretty good chance.
On the other hand, the rarer the better. What class is the rarest in Golarion?

Valiant |
@ Valiant, no summons, else I use a wish for 45 willing women.
however if magic (like charm person) can't be used, skills should be disallowed too.
So what typical character has the most sex-appeal. I would think the bard has a pretty good chance.
On the other hand, the rarer the better. What class is the rarest in Golarion?
Gunslinger...
Problem is that they sometimes shoot true...

Bruunwald |

Finally. A thread worth replying to.
I haven't read more than to the second reply, but I'm betting most people say bard. And bard it must be. I gotta tell you guys, for several years I was in various bands, gigging around my area. That was essentially my only job for awhile. The ugliest guys in the world bagged the hottest chicks, and often. I saw it. I was there. It was scary.
Need more proof? Did anybody here ever take drama classes in high school or college? Forget band camp; drama was sex ed.
And then there's band camp. Yeah, some of that stuff you heard about your school's band was very much true. Again, I was there to see it.
Bards get laid, end of story.
I would say sorcerers would be next. They're just sexy, when you think about it. A lot of why real life musicians get play is that they share sorcerous aspects; the moodiness, the charisma, the sense of creative energy within them, etc.
Fighters and rogues next. There's always work for fighters somewhere, and there's always some working class barmaid looking out for fresh meat. And there's always some rogue there, trying to steal the barmaid away.
Edit: Witches, Oracles and Druids would have made near the top of my list, but it seems their "activities" would more likely have to do with rituals of various sorts. That seems more like work than (p)lay to me.

Oracle of Sunder |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Then again Now Im thinking Monks because...lets face it Im sure there are few man that you feel safe in case of danger naked as well as fully armed (And com'on 2d10 humps? Gonna be a heck of a night and he has Ki to boost that, your guranteed to be unconscious every time, unless your a barbarian chick...which is hawt on so many other levels)
So thats why Sajan and Amiri (our iconic Monk and Barbarian) are in the same adventuring party...

fluffsorcerer |
fluffsorcerer wrote:I don't think that we should dismiss wizards so readily. An enchanter will have a decent charisma score (unless his player is altogether silly) along with the intelligence to back it up. Here we have a suave, knowledgeable, mystical personality who can impress the ladies (or gentleman) with wondrous displays of erudition and magic tempered with tact, so as not to offend or bore the audience. Try, try, try to understand; he's a magic man. ;)To be fair, a wizard needs 2 stats to accomplish that and a sorc needs one. An Arcane bloodline sorc can even get the DC higher on the entire enchantment school, while an infernal bloodline could at least do so for the charm subschool (and get it earlier). Sorcs are just as capable of Spell Focus as anyone else.
You do have a point there, Stabbitty. I was merely noting how the generally admired traits of charm and wit are exemplified in the enchanter, as well as the mystique of magical power. I was also invoking the archetype of the libertine and decadent student, which still pervades our perception of the educated classes, even today. But certainly, for raw, animal magnetism and charm, you can't deny the sorcerer.

sunbeam |
You are all wrong.
Depending on level, a Master Summoner can have about....
44 Succubi per DAY.... and they do absolutely everything he wants...needing no foreplay or whatsoever.
Rawr...god I love being a Master Summoner.
Beat that!
Now that is an interesting character concept. I don't get into clothes and wardrobe, but I'd be tempted for this character.
Probably spice things up by making half of the summons Erinyes though.

leo1925 |

HeHateMe wrote:Or potentially Cayden Cailen. You know he's all for drunken debauchery.Hu5tru wrote:Running a bard of Calistria, I say, anyone who reveres Calistria would likely get more tail than other classes.
That said, my bard regularly hosts orgies, and by regularly, I mean just about every day she has multiple partners in sessions that last several hours long.
... if she's not actually "working." But, she just recently attained Calistria's favor in a big way, so she's celebrating.
This is an interesting argument for a Paladin as well. A Paladin of Calistria must get some crazy hot action, like "Gimme a minute baby, after going 6 hours non-stop with you and your eight sisters, I'm dehydrated and pulled a muscle. However, that's what Lay on Hands is for!".
Wax on, wax off, ready for round 2.
Only 6 gods in Golarion have paladins (Torag, Erastil, Iomidae, Serenrae, Shelyn and Abadar). Well i guess that Aroden had paladins but since his dead now and all.....
Anyway my vote goes to sorcerers and bards.

dave.gillam |
Barbarian - Your idea of foreplay is stealing her from her village.
Does rape count as "getting some"?
bard - Sure, every Bard intro includes him being chased out of some woman's bedroom by her husband. And usually thats about as far into the adventure as the bard lives. So he scores once every 5 minutes, but only lives for 5 minutes. Hows that work?
Cleric - well, unless your praying to the god of trickery or *ahem*, your usually too busy praying on Friday night to go cruising for babes to score on
Druid - Young hippies never have a problem scoring. Not even other old hippies will sleep with an old hippie
Fighter - The looks, the bod, the lack of brains and CHA stat dump; as long as the cleric does the talking, you've got a chance
Paladin - Oh goodie, a choir boy is going to try and get naughty
monk - how does all that time contemplating your belly-button give you any time to contemplate someone else's?
Besides, moderation? Not gonna win the contest that way.
Ranger - woodland critters DONT COUNT!!!!
Rogue - Just as charming and fit as the bard, with the same "bad boy" vibe and FAR more street cred. And the sense not to mess with married women. Instead you choose single girls...with lots of friends......who like to share.
Sorcerer - Charming, and if your having a bad day, theres always magic.....
wizard - good thing you studied magic, you nerd. Thats about the only way your getting in her skirts
Alchemist - You can make enough gold to buy whoever you want
Cavalier - Your not interested unless you can throw a saddle on it and ride (So she'd better be big and into some kinky stuff)
Inquisitor - your too busy peeking in the girls changing rooms for "evil" (yeah, right) to actually get some
Oracle - Not only do you know who your gonna get, you know if they'll be any good too.
Summoner - Why settle for mortals when you can call down a Goddess?
Witch - Maybe if you HAD scored more often, you wouldn't have become one?

![]() |

Only 6 gods in Golarion have paladins (Torag, Erastil, Iomidae, Serenrae, Shelyn and Abadar). Well i guess that Aroden had paladins but since his dead now and all.....
Anyway my vote goes to sorcerers and bards.
Only six gods have organized orders of paladins. Paladins can exist for any other god that is only one alignment step away from LG. And Asmodeus. :P

leo1925 |

leo1925 wrote:Only six gods have organized orders of paladins. Paladins can exist for any other god that is only one alignment step away from LG. And Asmodeus. :POnly 6 gods in Golarion have paladins (Torag, Erastil, Iomidae, Serenrae, Shelyn and Abadar). Well i guess that Aroden had paladins but since his dead now and all.....
Anyway my vote goes to sorcerers and bards.
Cite.
Especially on the asmodeus' paladins.
Ævux |

He means over the course of a lifetime. Elves life far longer than other races.
Then ask yourself.. why are we not buried up to our eyeballs in elves?
And remember while elves can do it with other elves and humans.. Humans can do it with other humans, elves, orcs, demons, angels (or other celestial creatures), gods and whatever else strikes their fancy.
Course overall, beyond even a alchemist.. is a Cleric of Lamastu. Why?
The Mask of Lamastu allows you to mate with anything and even tell if it is in "heat" but only if your faith is in lamastu.

Fozbek |
Tiny Coffee Golem wrote:Then ask yourself.. why are we not buried up to our eyeballs in elves?
He means over the course of a lifetime. Elves life far longer than other races.
Because they're much less fertile than shorter-lived races? Kind of like how Giant Pandas are only fertile for 2-3 days out of every year.
Elves aren't stoic, staid, stiff-necked people in D&D. They're Chaotic by alignment. They are "emotional and capricious". Calistria, the Goddess of Lust (among other things), is a major Elven deity.
And remember while elves can do it with other elves and humans.. Humans can do it with other humans, elves, orcs, demons, angels (or other celestial creatures), gods and whatever else strikes their fancy.
So can elves. They just aren't fertile with quite as many species as humans are (although note that you can have a half-celestial or half-fiend elf just as easily as human).

neonmagician |

Bards top the list easy. Charisma, People skills, and an artist. May even have some money if they are any good. The women want him and the men want to be him.
The charisma casters (Oracle, Sorcerer, and Summoner) come in next. Their a little off, but with Charisma to spare, they will still have lots of ladies who overlook and may even like the vibe.
Aristocrats and the Gentlemen Thief come in next. Aristoract probably has money and sometimes thats enough. The cool, but dangerous thief has the bad boy feel.
The Paladin would be next assuming he can A. take the stick out, and B. is not one of the full plate fighters.
On the other end.
The Wizard... Lets face it your a nerd, you probably studied magic because the girls did not give you a 2nd look.
Most Witchs. Why is your Pet always.... Looking at me, and whats with those crazy evil eyes.
Full Plate Fighters (can actualy be any class that goes around all day wearing full plate armor.)
Random female NPC: Hey Sir Handle we left town over 10 hours ago, you never take that stuff off, and there is no pee hole. How can you hold it like that.
Full Plate Fighter: Hold It?
Random female NPC: Ewwwww....
Other Party Member: No wonder it always smells like a urinal wherever we go.

Captain Deathbeard |

Antipaladins. D&D's D-bags.
They are pretty much the Jersey Shore of the D&D world. They run in all ripped with their grease-ball charm and sweep all the drunk ladies off their feet. Nightly.
And with all that action, you know they are gleefully spreading filth fever or worse among the world's women.

![]() |

However, my number one go-to class to win the poon competition is the Bard. IMHO, no other class can compete with their boy-band appeal.Sound off gamers! Which character class would get laid most (in-game)?
If he's a boy-band bard, then he's probably looking to hook up with the bronzed martial god.

Krimson |

HeHateMe wrote:If he's a boy-band bard, then he's probably looking to hook up with the bronzed martial god.
However, my number one go-to class to win the poon competition is the Bard. IMHO, no other class can compete with their boy-band appeal.Sound off gamers! Which character class would get laid most (in-game)?
Best one yet!

Valiant |
Valiant wrote:You are all wrong.
Depending on level, a Master Summoner can have about....
44 Succubi per DAY.... and they do absolutely everything he wants...needing no foreplay or whatsoever.
Rawr...god I love being a Master Summoner.
Beat that!
Now that is an interesting character concept. I don't get into clothes and wardrobe, but I'd be tempted for this character.
Probably spice things up by making half of the summons Erinyes though.
Even without the magic, Summoners got charisma so way up high anyways they'd get enough action without the spells.
Think of it this way then:
- A Summoner can get enough action on his own.
- He can get the MOST action if magic was allowed.
- Hell!!! (literally sometimes) He's got access to such an incredible array and amount of action (What is your fancy? He can provide any sick fantasy you can think of!) that he can easily spare for other people!!
- Ergo: The Summoner's got so much action going on, he'd get rich setting up the most kinkey brothels in the world, making him even more attractive, as he'll not only be charismatic, but rich too. Incredibly rich...
I still say Summoners win over bards....win over everything :)
edit: Master Summoners that is. Regular Summoners can't ever get more then 1 at the time, while the Master Summoner can get...what...30 at the SAME time? Rawr.
Edit 2: Hell would be in trouble. Imagine the Balors going: "Oy, where are our women?!" When everybody discovers this possability if you'd be a Summoner? Everybody would become one! Everybody would be Summoning them out of Hell or any place we want...
As such, Hell and every other plane loses their women, dies out and we save our world from their threats!
Not only do Master Summoners get laid the most, they save the world while doing so!

leo1925 |

Kthulhu wrote:
Only six gods have organized orders of paladins. Paladins can exist for any other god that is only one alignment step away from LG. And Asmodeus. :P
leo1925 wrote:
Cite.
Especially on the asmodeus' paladins.
AP #29 - Mother of Flies - Asmodeus article - page 63, 65-66
Ok you are right, i back down for now. Until we get faiths of corruption that article is valid and you are correct.

Richard Leonhart |

valiant, summons don't take the things out of other dimensions, they just copy them. Only gate really takes it into your plane.
Still, a wish can get you more women than the summoner get summons.
And I'm not even speaking about leadership here.
When you include magic, there is no person who gets the most women. You can't wish for an infinity, so there is always one who can wish for 1 women more than you have had.

Valiant |
valiant, summons don't take the things out of other dimensions, they just copy them. Only gate really takes it into your plane.
Still, a wish can get you more women than the summoner get summons.
And I'm not even speaking about leadership here.When you include magic, there is no person who gets the most women. You can't wish for an infinity, so there is always one who can wish for 1 women more than you have had.
I still root for the Summoner, just cause! :))

Richard Leonhart |

yeah, having 50 summons running trough town and telling every women "have you heard, that one guy is amazing" certainly helps.
a rogue however can use his convincing lie (yes that talent doesn't make much sense, except here) to tell a woman how good he is (even after she just witnessed the contrary) and she can still use his bluff to tell other women about it.
after 2 minutes "damn girl, we did it for hours" *rolls a 20 on bluff*
a minute thereafter she's asked how it was: "well, we did it for hours" and the person that saw the woman only 5 minutes ago believes it, alien timeloss and all.

Richard Leonhart |

@slamevil
no offense to any woman, but if it were not for point 5 we would have a charisma 18 woman working in brothel with something that takes away the need for sleep.
if it were not for number 6, we just need a healthy married couple.
respecting all those rules, bard has a fair chance, but so does the rogue. Of course the aristocrat is still in game.
Money, charisma, skill, something that let's you take 10.

![]() |
Awww C'mon people - why are we still arguing? Its gotta be the Cavilier - heck, the order of the Basalisk can even get the Bards shtick of perform in addition to all the social graces - so you can guitar hero up a storm just as well.
Knights get all the good press and have the nobility thing going for them (even if they weren't of noble birth), and the shinny armour as well. AND you don't have the whole Paladin LG thing working against a few innocent "exaggarations" as to your 'nobility' or 'promises' of a more "long term relationship". Again, do I need to mention the Bard has actually laid all your ground work? The knight on the noble steed thing? He's doing all the work to help you get the girl!
Unlike the bard, you got the big biceps and so you don't need to jump out of windows for outraged husbands or boyfriends.
And again, the badass steed!, Chicks love horses especially big stallions that only their man can tame and only will let them ride them too... well... until the Cavalier says otherwise for another girl.

Arevashti |

Awww C'mon people - why are we still arguing? Its gotta be the Cavilier - heck, the order of the Basalisk can even get the Bards shtick of perform in addition to all the social graces - so you can guitar hero up a storm just as well.
Knights get all the good press and have the nobility thing going for them (even if they weren't of noble birth), and the shinny armour as well. AND you don't have the whole Paladin LG thing working against a few innocent "exaggarations" as to your 'nobility' or 'promises' of a more "long term relationship". Again, do I need to mention the Bard has actually laid all your ground work? The knight on the noble steed thing? He's doing all the work to help you get the girl!
Unlike the bard, you got the big biceps and so you don't need to jump out of windows for outraged husbands or boyfriends.
And again, the badass steed!, Chicks love horses especially big stallions that only their man can tame and only will let them ride them too... well... until the Cavalier says otherwise for another girl.
But does all of that compensate for Alain wrecking their rep?

dunelord3001 |

AP #29 - Mother of Flies - Asmodeus article - page 63, 65-66leo1925 wrote:Only six gods have organized orders of paladins. Paladins can exist for any other god that is only one alignment step away from LG. And Asmodeus. :PCite.
Especially on the asmodeus' paladins.
Hasn't that been declared a mistake/retconed out of existence?

leo1925 |

Hasn't that been declared a mistake/retconed out of existence?Kthulhu wrote:AP #29 - Mother of Flies - Asmodeus article - page 63, 65-66leo1925 wrote:Only six gods have organized orders of paladins. Paladins can exist for any other god that is only one alignment step away from LG. And Asmodeus. :PCite.
Especially on the asmodeus' paladins.
I guess we will have to wait until faiths of corruption comes out, if there is no mention of asmodeus paladins there, i think it's a safe bet to assume that it was retconed out of existance.

Ask a Succubus |

A recent survey published in the succubus periodical Knitting Monthly reported that Fighters were the most frequently encountered professional adventurer in the subset of pragmatic trysts (who survived the encounters) that a random selection of succubi reported over a twelve year spell.
Reasons given by succubi who favoured Fighters tended to include 'they're conveniently susceptible to flattery or other lines of approach', 'most other adventurers when not engaged in killing things and stealing stuff are usually too busy practising their spells and/or trying to sell their loot', and 'they tend to be easy targets for the get them so blind drunk they'll do anything ploy' (in the latter case due to the fact that they find it almost impossible to decline being invited to engage in a tavern drinking contest by a remotely pretty person).
Note that the survey included several possible statistical flaws such as succubi potentially being unwilling to admit to 'prize catches' of a more rarefied nature (in case someone else tried to steal them), the fact that spellcasters of any kind ended up being almost entirely ruled out of contention due to the high mortality rate incident amongst wouldbe smart-alec 'binders', and an almost inexplicable oyster price bubble that happened for a period of thirteen months across years six and seven of the survey.
Whilst this result is thus open to considerable challenge, I must say that an accompanying survey regarding liaisons between professional adventurers and a variety of ornamental garden fixtures made bemusing but interesting reading. For some reason, apparently there was a high incidence of encounters of bards and summoners with sundials, and a frankly baffling correlation between barbarians and gazebos (which almost all other professional adventurers avoided as if they suspected the things were cursed).
Hoping that this post has been Helpful.
Yours,
Ask A Succubus.