
Freehold DM |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

captain yesterday wrote:And Madison thinks they have hipsters.
That's some professionally obstinate hipster b$*&!!@% right there.
Well, both my brother and the Amish have similar views.
Both my brother and the Amish choose to send their kids to private schools that share their values.
As I said, too political for FaWtL, so I will refrain from further diatribes.
leaves toy bicycle and box of matches on nobodyshome's pillow

Freehold DM |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Tortured Crusader looks so tasty... and flavorful for the AP...
Sadly, although I have the first volume of Strange Aeons, nobody else in my group likes to run APs, and I am forbidden from running a horror game because of In Search of Sanity. Ever.
Period.
** spoiler omitted **...
why would you be forbidden from running after such an awesome game?

NobodysHome |
5 people marked this as a favorite. |

That said, it really is tremendously irritating, as both a teacher, and a parent, when you feel trapped by the rules into doing things that you feel are needless and stupid, but otherwise mandatory, due to social, school board, or legal whatsits. Especially if you know the individual in question. It's usually at that point that I privately go, "Okay, look: you and I both know that this is, by this point, merely a song and dance routine. Your kid gets sick. We have no legal or social recourse to prove why, and we can't really just handwaive it away or, this being California, we'll have truancy flooding out our eardrums*. You're a cool guy, who's a great cook and has excellent taste in pants; I'm a guy who likes martial arts and video games; just let us go through these meetings, go about our lives, and everyone will basically be happy. Incide tally: how's your son doing in school? Does he need tutoring services?**"
Oh, it's the usual nonsense: In-person, the vice principal is all understanding. Then I get a letter from him saying, "How dare your son be absent AGAIN!?!? We're setting up a meeting with the school board and calling CPS!" And I go in and call him out on it, and he says, "Oh, that's just boilerplate. Pay no attention to it at all!"
As a man who has used meticulously-kept records in the past to obliterate my foes (I have mentioned that I once received a letter of apology from the IRS, haven't I?), I really don't appreciate having such a large set of incendiary letters in my son's school records, especially after being told that "it's all good".
Those letters are a Sword of Damocles hanging over my head -- as long as nothing ever goes wrong, no problems at all. If we ever end up in serious legal proceedings with the school for any reason, those letters are a bombshell.
So I don't like 'em.

The Doomkitten |
3 people marked this as a favorite. |

The Doomkitten wrote:why would you be forbidden from running after such an awesome game?Tortured Crusader looks so tasty... and flavorful for the AP...
Sadly, although I have the first volume of Strange Aeons, nobody else in my group likes to run APs, and I am forbidden from running a horror game because of In Search of Sanity. Ever.
Period.
** spoiler omitted **...
It might be because I was running it in a public library. In a place where confused eight year olds tend to wander in.

![]() |

Freehold DM wrote:It might be because I was running it in a public library. In a place where confused eight year olds tend to wander in.The Doomkitten wrote:why would you be forbidden from running after such an awesome game?Tortured Crusader looks so tasty... and flavorful for the AP...
Sadly, although I have the first volume of Strange Aeons, nobody else in my group likes to run APs, and I am forbidden from running a horror game because of In Search of Sanity. Ever.
Period.
** spoiler omitted **...
Rude little bastards.

The Doomkitten |
5 people marked this as a favorite. |

Hush. Hush, Yesterday. I must never remember that bad time.
So, here was a conversation I had (paraphrased):
DK: Hey, why don't we just do some online games so we can count on having a consistent cast and nuanced stories and fun mechanics rather than having to dumb things down for the newbies that wander in? (D&D is an actual public teen program at my library.)
Player 1: Sounds cool!
Player 2: Yeah, I like that. Why don't we swap notes later? I have this great idea for a cooperative DM campaign we can run.
Player 3: Oh, sweet! Now we can finally play some PF instead of 5E!
Player 4: Eh, okay.
Player 5 and 6: Sure!
(the day before the online game)
P1: Hey, DK, my computer has completely broken down. Won't be able to make it to the online meet.
P2: OH S!#% NONE OF MY NOTES ARE READY GIMME A WEEK AND I'LL HAVE SOMETHING
P3: Hold on, I'm trying to squeeze an extra DPS for my build at 8th level. Give me a few days.
P4: My computer has literally exploded. The firemen are putting out the fires right now.
P5: Off with family. Can't come. Sorry.
P6: I got in a car crash. Will be hospitalized for a week or two.
This actually happened.

Freehold DM |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Freehold DM wrote:It might be because I was running it in a public library. In a place where confused eight year olds tend to wander in.The Doomkitten wrote:why would you be forbidden from running after such an awesome game?Tortured Crusader looks so tasty... and flavorful for the AP...
Sadly, although I have the first volume of Strange Aeons, nobody else in my group likes to run APs, and I am forbidden from running a horror game because of In Search of Sanity. Ever.
Period.
** spoiler omitted **...
... not seeing a problem here...

Limeylongears |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Speed, I'm not sure how two hours riding a bus could be considered "exciting".
Depends.
You might have a bus driver who looks exactly like Vizzini in 'The Princess Bride'
Or one who looks like Hugh Laurie in 'Jeeves and Wooster'
Or one who looks like Emo Hitler.
If that doesn't fit the bill, Sandra Bullock on the back seat will have to do.

Tacticslion |

It is usually a good idea to avoid the movie if you have already read the book.
I don't necessarily agree.
I think it's true in many cases, but in many others the difference of experience is worthwhile enough. It fully depends on how invested you are in the source material and whether or not the book was adapted in order to make a good film or in order to make a quick cash grab.
Often studios use the latter; the former turns out quite well, even if it's not the same as the book.
Those who are heavily emotionally invested in the source material, of course, may well disagree with the changes to the source - because they're emotionally heavily invested in the source material - but that's different from simply having read (and enjoyed) a book and then seeing a film thereafter. Yet even then, there are those who, with a strong enough understanding between the necessary differences of film and literature (or just open enough of a mindset for entertainment) will not only understand, but embrace differences.
As an example, I surely wouldn't mind seeing films based off of any number of books that I've read (and I wouldn't call myself either that open minded or that strong in my understanding).
Further, pretty much all of the LotR films were excellent - of course the series has its detractors, and well it should; but the films are solid; the detractors are fairly solidly based on sentimental investment in the source material or disinterest in the genre's deeper elements, not actual flaws within the films themselves.
"This doesn't work for me." is valid, but not a problem with the film.
"This is sucky." is valid only if it's true.
"This is kind of okay." is sadly commonly true, and is hyperbolically blown out of proportion in many different directions, based off of fandoms.

Tequila Sunrise |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Isn't that what sandwich meat is designed for. Maybe make a lot of grilled whatever and cheese sandwiches.
Not in Arizona. Just a couple weeks ago I ate pepperoni pizza that I had left out, and was then sick for a day before violently vomiting it up. :/
It was mighty good cajun-seasoned turkey breast, but it wasn't worth the risk.

Tequila Sunrise |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Tequila Sunrise wrote:hey that's one of my favorite movies!Alexander is truly terrible, watch that.
** spoiler omitted **
...If I didn't know you personally, I'd be judging you right now.
Judging hard.

Freehold DM |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

Freehold DM wrote:Tequila Sunrise wrote:hey that's one of my favorite movies!Alexander is truly terrible, watch that.
** spoiler omitted **
...If I didn't know you personally, I'd be judging you right now.
Judging hard.
** spoiler omitted **
it's a lot of action and colorful costumes and sets. I'm (not] sorry it isn't the somber line by line reading of historic accounts of his life that most people wanted, but it kept me interested throughout.

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Aranna wrote:It is usually a good idea to avoid the movie if you have already read the book.I don't necessarily agree.
I think it's true in many cases, but in many others the difference of experience is worthwhile enough. It fully depends on how invested you are in the source material and whether or not the book was adapted in order to make a good film or in order to make a quick cash grab.
Prime example: The Green Mile.

Aranna |

Tacticslion wrote:Prime example: The Green Mile.Aranna wrote:It is usually a good idea to avoid the movie if you have already read the book.I don't necessarily agree.
I think it's true in many cases, but in many others the difference of experience is worthwhile enough. It fully depends on how invested you are in the source material and whether or not the book was adapted in order to make a good film or in order to make a quick cash grab.
Boys... I said "usually" not "always". I realize there are exceptions to my statement.