In the Dragon Disciple prestige class, the phrase (and hyperlink) "form of the dragon II" is missing from the sentence:
"At 10th level, this ability functions as [form of the dragon II] and the dragon disciple can use this ability twice per day."
This has been corrected.
That was quick! :-)
This is probably just a problem with my browser (IE 6, while I'm at work), but the table "Actions in Combat" in the Combat section is messed up; it just displays as a bunch of text with no formatting.
I'm pretty sure it displayed fine at home, where I use Chrome.
Question: Will a search field be added?
btw, loving the PRD. Kudos!
Could it be possible to increase the font size and maybe even change it to a sans font instead of serif (or use a serif one that's designed for online reading, like georgia) ? It's quite small and hard to read as it is, compared to the d20 SRD. Especially for people with so-so monitors and bad eyesight :) It's just minor CSS niggle ;)
This is probably just a problem with my browser (IE 6, while I'm at work), but the table "Actions in Combat" in the Combat section is messed up; it just displays as a bunch of text with no formatting.
I'm pretty sure it displayed fine at home, where I use Chrome.
This should be fixed now. (The site certainly doesn't look its best under IE 6, but this was a markup problem.)
Could it be possible to increase the font size and maybe even change it to a sans font instead of serif (or use a serif one that's designed for online reading, like georgia) ? It's quite small and hard to read as it is, compared to the d20 SRD. Especially for people with so-so monitors and bad eyesight :) It's just minor CSS niggle ;)
The font size has been bumped up.
Could it be possible to increase the font size and maybe even change it to a sans font instead of serif (or use a serif one that's designed for online reading, like georgia) ? It's quite small and hard to read as it is, compared to the d20 SRD. Especially for people with so-so monitors and bad eyesight :) It's just minor CSS niggle ;)The font size has been bumped up.
That's a good change, thank you!
My 61 year old eyes say Thank You for the increase to the font size.
In the summoning list for the Summon Nature's Ally spells, "Goblin Dog" should be "Goblin dog" and "Electric Eel" should be "Electric eel".
Also, in the spell index, "Ghoul touch" should be "Ghoul Touch".
In the description for Shapechange, "beast form IV" should be "beast shape IV" (and should be hyperlinked).
Should domain spells normally availabel only to Sor/Wiz be included in the spell entry?
For instance, Fireball ought to read : Sor/Wiz 3, Fire 3
and I think a number of spells have this problem.
The PRD is meant to match the content of the printed book + published errata exactly. We are specifically trying to avoid cases where the Book says X, errata says Y and PRD says Z.
This includes hyperlinks. (Compared against the PDF, obviously.)
Therefore, if an error is reflected in the book, please do not report it as a problem with the PRD. Report it as errata for the book.
|
My 61 year old eyes say Thank You for the increase to the font size.
Control and the plus key do the same thing for any website. Default font size is never really an issue, as long as it's actual text and not just text in an image file.
(And of course Control and the minus key shrinks things back down a step.)
Should domain spells normally availabel only to Sor/Wiz be included in the spell entry?
They are not listed as such in the book. I cannot speak for Jason or anyone in the editorial staff about why these labels were removed, but I would guess that it had to do with the fact that bloodlines can now also grant non-standard spells and it can get a bit cumbersome to list every single list that a spell is on.
In the summoning list for the Summon Nature's Ally spells, "Goblin Dog" should be "Goblin dog" and "Electric Eel" should be "Electric eel".
In the description for Shapechange, "beast form IV" should be "beast shape IV" (and should be hyperlinked).
These are consistent with the printed material and will remain until such time as errata is issued.
Also, in the spell index, "Ghoul touch" should be "Ghoul Touch".
This will be corrected at some point. Possibly tomorrow.
Knowledge skills table, title on second column. Formatting error.
Knowledge skills table, title on second column. Formatting error.
Fixified!
Young'n
-- david
Papa.DRB
My 61 year old eyes say Thank You for the increase to the font size.
There is a formatting error under Wondrous Items>Deck of Illusions.
Queen of Clubs
Corrected.
Additional Rules:
Table: Random Starting Ages appears as jumbled text, not a table.
Under Carrying Capacity, 4th paragraph, references Table: Encumbrance Effects, which is not on the web page.
Under Tactical Movement, 2nd paragraph, references Table: Hampered Movement, which is not on the page.
Under Overland Movement, 6th paragraph, references Table: Terrain and Overland Movement, which is not on the page.
Combat:
Under Combat Statistics, Armor Class. there is a reference to "see Table: Armor and Shields". Should probably have a link to that table (as it's on a different page).
Under "Big and Little Creatures in Combat", Table: Creature Size and Scale appears as jumbled text.
The hyperlink to 'fly' says 'fog_cloud' instead. So the link works, but is formatted wrong
Funny...when I click on the hyperlink to the spell "Fly", I get the right link, but the page title that I see in my browser's tab says "Floating Disk".
RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8
|
Funny...when I click on the hyperlink to the spell "Fly", I get the right link, but the page title that I see in my browser's tab says "Floating Disk".The hyperlink to 'fly' says 'fog_cloud' instead. So the link works, but is formatted wrong
New spell needs added to the PRD Ross's floating hyperlink.
New spell needs added to the PRD Ross's floating hyperlink.
I've read this sentence about 5 times now, and I still don't know what it means. :-)
|
RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8
|
I've read this sentence about 5 times now, and I still don't know what it means. :-)
New spell needs added to the PRD Ross's floating hyperlink.
It was a botched attempt at Craft (humour). We've had reports of two different URLs pointing to 'Fly' and neither of them said 'fly'
Spell Index:
As of a few minutes ago, the hyperlinks for the last fifteen or so spells (starting with Water Walk) each lead to a "URL not found" error message.
This should be fixed now. Please let me know if it keeps happening.
Additional Rules:
Combat:
Fixed.
on http://paizo.com/pathfinderRPG/prd/spellIndex.html
there is an error on Order of presentation link http://paizo.com/pathfinderRPG/prd/spellLists..html doubled dot
on http://paizo.com/pathfinderRPG/prd/spellIndex.html
there is an error on Order of presentation link http://paizo.com/pathfinderRPG/prd/spellLists..html doubled dot
This should be fixed.
Any chance we can move the Feats Table to the top of the Feats Page, with all the "read once" feat stuff beneath it?
My scrollin' finger is starting to hurt.
this is only an suggest, for me will be better remove the doubled menu on home page it make confusion
Question: Will a search field be added?
Just as an FYI, the d20pfsrd.com site has a google powered search box :)
Just sayin...
Could it be possible to increase the font size and maybe even change it to a sans font instead of serif (or use a serif one that's designed for online reading, like georgia) ? It's quite small and hard to read as it is, compared to the d20 SRD. Especially for people with so-so monitors and bad eyesight :) It's just minor CSS niggle ;)
Also, the default font size on d20pfsrd.com site is 12, and is a sans serif font, the same as on d20srd.org.
If you have anything else you'd like to see on the site, feel free to post here or shoot me an email (jreyst@gmail.com).
Any chance we can move the Feats Table to the top of the Feats Page, with all the "read once" feat stuff beneath it?
My scrollin' finger is starting to hurt.
Starting to sound like a broken record, but... d20pfsrd.com is already configured this way :)
Also, the default font size on d20pfsrd.com site is 12, and is a sans serif font, the same as on d20srd.org.
If you have anything else you'd like to see on the site, feel free to post here or shoot me an email (jreyst@gmail.com).
Are you updating it concurrently with the official PRD?
Suggestions (I know the official PRD wants to stay true to the book and pdf, but there might be something in here that's useful too):1) On each spell list page, have a list of links at the top to the various spell levels (so you don't have to manually scroll down).
2) Maybe have pages on the sorcerer/wizard that are indexed by school (for specialists to quickly find all spells of their school)
3) have a diagram/schematic show the progress of the light "scale" - i.e. from bright light, through normal light and dim light to darkness. I know it's a fairly easy concept, but diagrams always help people understand stuff like this easier.
4) Actions In Combat - the "does it provoke AoO" table could benefit from a visual representation of the table frame, just like e.g. the ability scores table. Especially for those of us with a widescreen monitor.
Anyway, just a couple of quick suggestions. :-)
EDIT:
Also, in the bestiary, the templates would be very useful! Difficult to make a warhorse without the advanced template.
Are you updating it concurrently with the official PRD?
Well I haven't been redownloading the PDF and re-importing content into the site direct from the PDF, assuming new PDF's are being posted everytime new errata is posted that is.. I'm not sure if it is or not. What I've been doing so far is basically monitoring these boards for errata people find and then correcting the obvious ones and then waiting to see if Jason or another Paizonite posts a clarification. I may not have every correction but hopefully I'm pretty close.
1) On each spell list page, have a list of links at the top to the various spell levels (so you don't have to manually scroll down).
At first I didn't know what you meant but I think I understand now. Are you saying that on a page like this one I should add a menu of spell levels, and when you click Seven (7) you go to the 7th level spells? If so, that's a great idea and I'll get that in there asap.
2) Maybe have pages on the sorcerer/wizard that are indexed by school (for specialists to quickly find all spells of their school)
Another good idea. I had this one planned already.
3) have a diagram/schematic show the progress of the light "scale" - i.e. from bright light, through normal light and dim light to darkness. I know it's a fairly easy concept, but diagrams always help people understand stuff like this easier.
Absolutely. I hadn't thought of this one but I'll definitely add it in.
4) Actions In Combat - the "does it provoke AoO" table could benefit from a visual representation of the table frame, just like e.g. the ability scores table. Especially for those of us with a widescreen monitor.
I am planning to go through all pages and make the tabular data areas look more like the tables on the Skills page (check it out).
Anyway, just a couple of quick suggestions. :-)
Good ones! Keep them coming!
Also, in the bestiary, the templates would be very useful! Difficult to make a warhorse without the advanced template.
Good point. I'll see about clearing that up.
1) On each spell list page, have a list of links at the top to the various spell levels (so you don't have to manually scroll down).
This one is done on the Wizard/Sorcerer page.
Are you updating it concurrently with the official PRD?Well I haven't been redownloading the PDF and re-importing content into the site direct from the PDF, assuming new PDF's are being posted everytime new errata is posted that is.. I'm not sure if it is or not. What I've been doing so far is basically monitoring these boards for errata people find and then correcting the obvious ones and then waiting to see if Jason or another Paizonite posts a clarification. I may not have every correction but hopefully I'm pretty close.
They should announce via e-mail when they update the pdf with errata. That should help the process along.
1) On each spell list page, have a list of links at the top to the various spell levels (so you don't have to manually scroll down).At first I didn't know what you meant but I think I understand now. Are you saying that on a page like this one I should add a menu of spell levels, and when you click Seven (7) you go to the 7th level spells? If so, that's a great idea and I'll get that in there asap.
2) Maybe have pages on the sorcerer/wizard that are indexed by school (for specialists to quickly find all spells of their school)Another good idea. I had this one planned already.
3) have a diagram/schematic show the progress of the light "scale" - i.e. from bright light, through normal light and dim light to darkness. I know it's a fairly easy concept, but diagrams always help people understand stuff like this easier.Absolutely. I hadn't thought of this one but I'll definitely add it in.
4) Actions In Combat - the "does it provoke AoO" table could benefit from a visual representation of the table frame, just like e.g. the ability scores table. Especially for those of us with a widescreen monitor.I am planning to go through all pages and make the tabular data areas look more like the tables on the Skills page (check it out).
Coolness, you got it all right (despite my vague description) and the changes to come/already implemented look spiffy!
I'll peruse the site some more and see if there's anything else that might be a good idea.
The text for the optional trait Sacred Conduit is not consistent with the latest PDF release for the character traits. The one in the PRD references turning and rebuking undead when it should be channeling energy.
Can we please keep this thread to discussing errors and other problems with the official (Paizo-hosted) PRD? It does not help me fix problems if I first have to figure out what website the poster is even talking about.
If folks want to talk about d20pfsrd.org, that's fine, but please do it in another thread.
This is wrong in the PRD.
This is wrong in the PRD.
Traits are not currently part of the PRD. You are linking to jryest's d20pfsrd.org site.
This is exactly the kind of confusion I was hoping to avoid in this thread.
Sorry Ross, I'll start a separate thread.
My apologies. It didn't register that I had transitioned from the PRD to a fan run site.