I tried this elsewhere, but maybe the thread title just isn't working for it. Is there no love for today's blog illustration? I was excited by the return of the big pic, and the mite just cracks me up.
Any speculation on what it will be in the new bestiary? Goblinoid?
Is there no love for today's blog illustration? I was excited by the return of the big pic, and the mite just cracks me up.
Totally agree about the mite! Awesome and a must-have. I've ordered one for each of my family members' Christmas stockings.
|
Any speculation on what it will be in the new bestiary? Goblinoid?The mite (according to the BBestiary, it will be in the Bestiary), I guess.
It looks a bit... a bit... DULL to be a PFGoblin. And BLUE. ;-)
I suspect Maikurion was speculating on the mite's subtype. Thus, goblinoid instead of goblin. Just guessing though. :P
Jeremy Puckett
I call fey. Just like the other Gremlins.
|
Any speculation on what it will be in the new bestiary? Goblinoid?The mite (according to the BBestiary, it will be in the Bestiary), I guess.
It looks a bit... a bit... DULL to be a PFGoblin. And BLUE. ;-)I suspect Maikurion was speculating on the mite's subtype. Thus, goblinoid instead of goblin. Just guessing though. :P
Jeremy Puckett
Uhhhhh... whooops. Sorry. My bad. ^_^
I agree with the Fey, then.
That's right...probably fey. And yes, "goblinoid" was going for subtype in my OP.
Anyway, I think the illustration is fun, and am happy to have another preview. Although, one in the stocking might be a bit shocking...
Finally! I'm tired of these sizist stereotypes!
Giant is gone as a type.
It's now known as the "Non-sizist" type or the "Type formerly known as Giant but now including mites".
Giant is gone as a type.But it's still there as a subtype of humanoid.
And monstrous humanoid probably. Maybe even aberration. But not fey. I think.
It's now known as the "Non-sizist" type or the "Type formerly known as Giant but now including mites".
I think that should be... shortened.
And monstrous humanoid probably. Maybe even aberration. But not fey. I think.
There's already a fey in the Bonus Bestiary: the nixie.
And monstrous humanoid probably. Maybe even aberration. But not fey. I think.There's already a fey in the Bonus Bestiary: the nixie.
Not a fey giant, though.
Would probably be horrific.
Heh. Yet.
And monstrous humanoid probably. Maybe even aberration. But not fey. I think.There's already a fey in the Bonus Bestiary: the nixie.Not a fey giant, though.
Would probably be horrific.
Ah I get what you mean. :)
The mite (according to the BBestiary, it will be in the Bestiary), I guess.
It looks a bit... a bit... DULL to be a PFGoblin. And BLUE. ;-)
My six year old saw it. I told her it was a smurf first thing in the morning after staying up too late.
That is one grumpy murfsay.
Smurftacular art!
There's some kind of link malfunction, Sharoth.
There's some kind of link malfunction, Sharoth.
No there isn't.
Yes there is.
Yes there is.
I don't think the "link" is meant to go anywhere. It just triggers the blueification of his icon and makes him three apples tall?
It even looks like it works when it's in a quote and isn't actually a link, or I'm interpreting things poorly.
Yes there is.I don't think the "link" is meant to go anywhere. It just triggers the blueification of his icon and makes him three apples tall?
It even looks like it works when it's in a quote and isn't actually a link, or I'm interpreting things poorly.
Oh, that. There are more interesting ways of doing that. [url=smurf] [/url]
Smurf!