To sneaksy I understand that I took your comment the wrong way and I wanted you to know that before the thread was stopped I gladly accepted your apology because I was just as much at fault for taking it the wrong way instead of asking you first.
Second Again I agree with you that everybody should have the kind of game they want and I never meant to say otherwise but MY PERSONAL Opinion is that spellcasters are being robed of their flavor the more they are being underpowered.
To any Paizo type person that reads this I hated to have to start a new thread but I couldn't continue the previous thread and I didn't want sneaksy to think that I was being rude and not accepting his apology and be able to make one of my own.
That said on to the game.
|
I am glad you accepted my apology, and i will be more careful with my word choice. I want spellcasters to be awesome too, breath magic back into them. I just prefer my mages to be the gamble to play, incredible power, but so easy to kill. I feel that 3.0 took alot from them with the 5ft step and casting on the defensive (max one skill and you have no problem casting in melee)
I for giving fireball sick damage thats hard to evade, holds that are not saved against every round and massive 9th level spells that slay armies with ease.
im just tired of spellcasters having just enough hitpoints and defenses to cast about all there spells and the go invisible/teleport/fly away, it happens in EVERY combat (unless the DM wants the NPC dead)Wizards were the number 1 death in 2nd ed, now the honor goes to Rogues and Fighters. Im not concerned about our party wizard at all, never have been able to be worried about him, they are always just better at this game than nonspellcasters.
(need CON cap like 2nd ed ^^)