Sorry, but I love this... yeah, granted, as a ranger player I would have preferred a bit more of an evolution to the ranger... perhaps drop the magic spells for more special class ability... but I can live with it... or simply go druid/fighter instead... or just create my own class that is more suiting for what I want... or use the Scout class from the later 3.5 books... I can do what I want, because Pathfinder allows that.
So, in response to all the bye... yeah, I had to get the 4th edition books for a professional reason, but I don't have to like them or play them....
Sorry, but I'm staying with Pathfinder.. so deal with it.
|
Sorry, but I love this... yeah, granted, as a ranger player I would have preferred a bit more of an evolution to the ranger... perhaps drop the magic spells for more special class ability... but I can live with it... or simply go druid/fighter instead... or just create my own class that is more suiting for what I want... or use the Scout class from the later 3.5 books... I can do what I want, because Pathfinder allows that.
So, in response to all the bye... yeah, I had to get the 4th edition books for a professional reason, but I don't have to like them or play them....
Sorry, but I'm staying with Pathfinder.. so deal with it.
I'm also sticking with Pathfinder. I'm using it already, actually (at least as much as I can). I can say honestly that it's better than straight 3.5, and a fast conversion between the two (in the rare cases it's even necessary; for canned monsters (i.e. from a monster book) I just swap out the skills. If I'm feeling really ambitious, I'll give it an extra feat or two. Works just fine.
I'm also sticking with Pathfinder. I'm using it already, actually (at least as much as I can). I can say honestly that it's better than straight 3.5, and a fast conversion between the two (in the rare cases it's even necessary; for canned monsters (i.e. from a monster book) I just swap out the skills. If I'm feeling really ambitious, I'll give it an extra feat or two. Works just fine.Sorry, but I love this... yeah, granted, as a ranger player I would have preferred a bit more of an evolution to the ranger... perhaps drop the magic spells for more special class ability... but I can live with it... or simply go druid/fighter instead... or just create my own class that is more suiting for what I want... or use the Scout class from the later 3.5 books... I can do what I want, because Pathfinder allows that.
So, in response to all the bye... yeah, I had to get the 4th edition books for a professional reason, but I don't have to like them or play them....
Sorry, but I'm staying with Pathfinder.. so deal with it.
Yeah, I've started incorporating bits of the game into 3.5... it is better in the end... though I have a jumble of printed pages right now (can't wait for the bound book)...
my thing is this, most DM that I have ever known fudges and mods rules as needed, so the 3.5 and 3.0 differences really are not that important.
Oh yeah, well let me tell you something The problem with.....Oh, wait I'm going Pathfinder too.
Hey we got nothing to fight about? Huh, this feels kinda strange.
Ummmm, so. Yeah. Okay.