![]() ![]()
![]() Well are many things to be said for a ranged paladin, but it will become quite powerful damage-wise. So that would depend in whether it fits the theme. Id recommend Dex as you're not really using wisdom anyway, and you don't need it for the will save. And Dex will help you with sneaking of course! If you're going with a twohander you won't have to worry about holding your own in combat if you're getting the chance to smite. Don't forget the armour expert trait that lowers the penalty armor imposes on stealth etc, btw! ![]()
![]() I'll get into it in detail further, but one thing to keep in mind is that pallies cast off of Charisma now. Going by the comment for your wisdom score that might be one change you hadn't picked up on since making the switch. Also look at the wonderful changes to smite in detail! Also, I agree with BBT that the inquisitor might be a great choice. The sin inquisiton, for instance, lets you see which sins dwell in the hearts of men. You will lose the ability to detect evil at will, though. Going with the stealth as well you might want to look into the heretic archetype of the inquisitor.
[LPJ Design] Adventure Path Iconics: Path of the Wicked preview for Way of the Wicked Adventure Path
[LPJ Design] Adventure Path Iconics: Path of the Wicked preview for Way of the Wicked Adventure Path
![]()
![]() MrSin wrote: I thought I already mentioned the idea of making a custom wayfinder with 50 slots a few post ago to get rid of that pesty interference? Yeah, you did. Which would bring it firmly into the realm of crafting fully custom items, for which no rules even exist. Calling that OP is like calling the belt that turns you into a Tarrasque OP... Well. Duh. Clarify; not an attack at you. It would be a valid option, ofc, but would show that it is certainly not within the original rules, nor makes wayfinders OP. ![]()
![]() maouse wrote: No, you don't roll every time you put a stone in. You roll ONE 75% chance to see if you have an amplifying WayFinder. The specific resonance you're using is in a list which clearly states the following: "The resonant powers of the most common forms of ioun stones are listed below. "The resonant powers of ... ioun stones.
![]()
![]() Let me just conclude by quoting the following. A normal wayfinder has one slot for an ioun stone. The one with the highest number of slots is the wayfinder of Passage. Priced 136.000 or 68.000 to craft. wayfinder of passge wrote: Three slots on the inner side of the lid can each hold one ioun stone. and it also mentions that seekers of secrets wrote: The auras of multiple augmenting wayfinders tend to interfere with each other; a person with one who tries to hold or carry a second usually finds that both sputter out in just a few seconds, but activate again once the second one is set aside. Some advanced, expensive wayfinders may hold more than one ioun stone at the same time and still function (though another wayfinder can interfere if brought too close). So at best you can make use of 3 combat feats, for rogues, for which they meet the pre-requisites, provided that you spend 68.000 gp on crafting a wayfinder of passage, and craft the three ioun stones. ![]()
![]() Seekers of Secrets wrote: "In addition, the magic worked into the wayfinder amplif ies the power of the ioun stone, usually (about 75% of the time) unlocking new abilities in addition to the stone’s normal power." Are you arguing here that every time an ioun stone is docked it will have a 75% chance of producing an effect, which will differ each time you dock it? ![]()
![]() Maouse wrote: you could just get some other Rogue Talents (selectable once each) at first level. So you can be doing bleeding crits, fast stealth, and ledgewalking all at first level... still OP since it is basically FREE to craft. Bleeding crits? Really? I didn't know rogues had a BAB of +11 at level 1. Or the critical focus feat, for that matter. ![]()
![]() Well, as people have pointed out several times now, it is not the wayfinder producing this bonus, but the ioun stones. Logically this would mean that the combat trick could be taken more than once, for different combat feats, if multiple ioun stones support this. However, stacking them is mentioned as a problem since interference takes place. I'm not really sure what you are describing with the last theory. But let me just say this; if you have a feat and you somehow lose the pre-requisites for this feat, you also lose the ability to use this feat. Once you meet its pre-requisites again, you'll be able to use it again. And secondly, if it grants the knowledge of a single rogue talent--in this case combat trick--this would have to remain the same combat feat. You can't suddenly freely reassign an extra feat each level. ![]()
![]() Well if you want to craft an ioun stone that has a resonant power that says "You now have acces to a feat that you do not need the prereqs for" that would be wholly houseruled. RAW, imo, you are not able to do so. Rogues would be able to gain a certain specified bonus combat feat they meet the pre-requisites for. ![]()
![]() Well first up, I think you are referring to the line "If the power is a feat, the bearer gains that feat as a bonus feat even if he does not meet its prerequisites" It then goes on to mention feats like alertness, Blind-Fight, and yes "knowledge of a single rogue talent." If you were to apply this to combat trick, I would argue you do not gain access to feats, since you didn't choose a feat from the resonant powers, but rather you chose the option of a rogue talent. Since rogues taking this combat trick--namely a feat--would have to meet the prerequisites for said feat, I would argue you would need to do the same. Also note that this would then only work for rogues, since the resonant power (26) clearly states "If the bearer is a rogue, he gains the talent of this talent as if he had selected it." ![]()
![]() Oh he was talking about a normal wayfinder? I thought he meant another form of wayfinder, like the few custom ones there already are—like the wayfinder of passage and so on—which would provide a custom resonance. But yes, ioun stones provide the resonance in normal wayfinders. And I doubt GMs would allow you to cherry pick from the "method 2" list in seeker of secrets, or come up with your own additional resonances. ![]()
![]() prd wrote: Holding the Charge: If you don't discharge the spell in the round when you cast the spell, you can hold the charge indefinitely. You can continue to make touch attacks round after round. If you touch anything or anyone while holding a charge, even unintentionally, the spell discharges. If you cast another spell, the touch spell dissipates. There you go! :-) ![]()
![]() Elosandi wrote:
Is that true? I've wondered about this myself, but doesn't it work on rays only, or am I not reading it right? ![]()
![]() jwood314 wrote:
This! And congratulations! I loved playing through book 1, but sadly I had to move. I've since bought the first book and am hoping my group will enjoy it as much as I did! ![]()
![]() I'd go so far as to say she loses her resistances, since I'd consider it a physical attribute depending on her being-an-aasimar, not a mental one. And I'd say you're spot on with the rules.
![]()
![]() KenderKin wrote:
That's pretty much how I play my paladin. If there's any dodgy work to be done he's kept in the dark. Might be a little metagame-y at times, but it's by far the easiest way to keep the game going. And his low wisdom and perception back it up, somewhat. He's somewhat naive and gullible when it comes to his friends in that he believes his friends when they tell him something. And it also prevents the campaign from derailing too badly as the rogue can't do anything too evil in broad daylight. ![]()
![]() Calybos1 wrote:
You'd be amazed how many would do this with their soul! *cough* Lich *cough* Speaking of, could a lich make their phylactery their bonded item? ![]()
![]() Ah damn, the forum ate my post. Anyway; yeah what Kydeem said.
As for the familiar;
srd wrote: If a familiar is dismissed, lost, or dies, it can be replaced 1 week later through a specialized ritual that costs 200 gp per wizard level. The ritual takes 8 hours to complete. it only costs you some gold :) ![]()
![]() One thing to keep in mind if you're dealing with a master summoner and he's really going all out with summoning his minions is that it might be fun to have other players play, and get to know, his regular summons. That way the rest of the table gets to join in a bit. This will certainly get more fun once you get to the higher summon monster X abilities that have exciting abilities themselves. And the added benefit is that the master summoner doesn't hog all the limelight. :) ![]()
![]() ZanzerTem wrote:
Summoners can summon using their spell like ability though, which only takes a standard action. So I'm afraid this particular trick won't work against summoners. ![]()
![]() Blitterbug wrote: So when the archetypes say "Treat X, X, and X as class skills", how does that work? If the base animal has no skill ranks in those skills, it doesn't even get the +3 bonus. Or is this just another way to say that if the wizard/etc has a rank in those skills, the familiar gets a +3 bonus when it uses its master's ranks? I think that's spot on, yes. Familiars use their master's ranks, so it seems like the correct interpretation. ![]()
![]() AD wrote: hey, greater teleport at will. Unless I'm mistaken summoned creatures can't use their teleport abilities. Summon Monster I wrote:
Emphasis mine. That said, they still seem to be more than a fair match for a mummy, certainly. ![]()
![]() I agree with Drakhiel that it is somewhat ambiguous. Especially since the name of the ability is aquatic telepathy. However, with improved familiar you could achieve largely the same thing, I.e., telepathy. Either through true speech familiars (cassias angel, etc.) who can speak with any creature that has a language for you, or if you're really going for telepathy, with the imp consular at level 8, who also has telepathy and could relay a conversation for you. Since this is a 9th level power, I'd argue it's roughly balanced in a way that it shouldn't impact play too much at that level. That said; does anyone know anything about rules for talking underwater? Maybe it's flavoured as a way to compensate for the lack of being able to communicate efficiently with allies; I imagine it would be particularly difficult when trying to actually talk to an ally underwater who is 100 ft away. ![]()
![]() I'd argue that it just does what it says; give you telepathy and in addition allow you to communicate with unintelligent aquatic creatures. Telepathy is a normally defined ability: srd wrote:
And unless the ability specifically mentions it overrides this normal ability, it doesn't change the base ability. ![]()
![]() As is mentioned in the Bestiary: "About one out of every 20 drow is gifted with special powers from birth—the overwhelming majority of these exceptional drow are female, and as a result, drow society tends to be matriarchal in nature. These special births are engineered and encouraged among the ruling caste, and are far more likely to occur when the mother is of noble heritage. Strangely, the status of the father seems not to increase or decrease the chances of a child being born a drow noble." This is actually a different 'race' altogether. You have the normal drow, and then the Noble ones. The ARG offers a way for PCs to get the noble-ish powers, but does not actually transform the base race into the Drow, Noble race. |