Just to clarify, DM_Blake, I would never feel the need to issue an infinite number of clauses for an action. Even more than one trigger would be illegal if it affects more that 1 target (as per alex1976 example). I just wanted to make a point that it is unreal to think that a warrior trying to kill a wizard (on the long term) or at least prevent his spellcasting (on the short term) will let him walk away just because he just happened to decide he was going to take a step back before casting his spell. Mainly because the warrior is likely to know that one spell is coming up right after that 5 feet step. I think it is reasonable for a DM to allow certain rules flexibility. It is when there is no flexibility that ruleslawyering rears its ugly head...
Be extra careful with that stuff, Heathy. Here in Spain we have the doubtful honor of having the first secondary infection outside Africa(that is to say, contagion happening inside the country, not imported case). The authorities are looking into how that came to happen since in theory WHO protocols were being followed to the letter. Being a professional of healthcare I fully agree with Heathy's angle, everyone can make a mistake, but in this line of work mistakes may unfortunately kill...
Male Elf Magus 6; hp 51/51; Init +7; Per +8; AC 20, touch 16, FF 15; CMB +5; CMD 20; Fort +7, Ref +8, Will +6; Arcane Pool 4/6
I´m up late here in Spain, watching Sons of Anarchy. I´ll be here for a while ;D N´Kai is barely able to articulate sotto voce to his companions ... "Wow, I can honestly say than in all my travels I have never seen anything like that..." "Hi, Dobitoc, I´m N´Kai and I am as committed as your friends here as setting you free, but we need to know a couple of things first. Such as what you remember about the night the guard took you at the library. Did someone ask you to grab something from the library??" Damn, ninj´d again. Cursed detective :)
Hi all, just thought I´d drop by! I will be joining you as soon my character is ready.
|
