
Sir James Durham-Fairfax |

Aye dear sir. I was speaking to my French friend yesterday who has played Werewolf frequently and he was implying after a few games the speculation is easier and more care-free. 'I have been killer last 2 games, not again.' 'Hang him, if I am wrong, hang me next.'
I think it could be useful in the next game to have a scenario for the players to interact with, maybe a secondary type mission. Ie an ambassadors' ball and everyone is trying to ensure trade agreements. As even if we have no actual stats/mission it provides a framework for creative posts. As 5-9 people in an airship we have just been hanging around the lounge drinking, which is fun. But sometimes I have been a bit hard pressed of what to type next.

Wowbagger tIP |

unfortunately, Alessandra and robert showing up to vote together seals it. Now by wowbagger voting for alessandra, that triggers a robert vote for me. He tries to convince james knowing he doesn't need to convince anyone else because alessandra is already with him. can't get any better evidence of collusion than that.

Sir James Durham-Fairfax |

If a non-assassin, non-Silver Fox is lynched then the Aristocrats could Stalemate but it would be very slow going, relying upon luck. As the Slver Fox could stop the assassinations with 3/1 or 4/1 probablity each day. Of course if the Silver Fox is lynched then it is definitely over. And if we lynch an assassin then it tips in the Aristicrats favour.
I know this could be IC.

Hamish Cunningham |

If an assassin is lynched, the game will continue. If not, we'll be starting my next game: WEREWOLVES!
Would you consider opening up the recruitment thread right away for Werewolves? Since it looks as though this could be over in about the same time it would take to recruit the next game, we could segue right into it.

Professor Alessandra Devries |

Rather than say 'I told you so', I'll get it out of the way now.
I'm an aristocrat! The only PM I've received relating to this game was from a player wheedling and dealing to try to get me to change my vote. *IF* Wowbagger is also an aristocrat, it looks like we'll be moving on to the werewolf game tomorrow...

Wowbagger tIP |

the quick vote of you and alessandra together at the end of the round is not conclusive proof, but quite suspicious. With no prior coordination at all that I could see. That is what is great about this game, second guessing second guesses. Reminds me a little of Vizzinni in Princess Bride, I know you want me to pick that, so I'll say this.
THE GREATEST PROOF IS LETO'S VOTE FOR YOU ROBERT

The Red Robert |

-Nods- Fair point. That would seem suspicious!
But I ask you, dear Wowbagger, who voted first? Was it I or the Lady Alessandra?
I did.
Now, we can all agree that the Assassins know eachother, it has had to have happened. So, if I was an Assassin, and I knew who the other Assassin was, then surely they too would have voted for my target, yes?
But, as the Professor is an Aristocrat, and the good Doctor still lives, then that would assume that the other Assassin voted for someone else, yes? So why would we divide our targets, this late in the game?
Aaah of course... To spread a wider net. -Nods- This could be the case. Perhaps, by provoking the Professor in to voting for him, the Doctor and I played a nice game of bait and switch. Perhaps I was hovering near the forum to change my vote, should it look like my accomplace, who we can now assume is the good Doctor, would be getting the boot. And by my voting for him, I secured the thought that there was no link between us.
Or, perhaps it meant nothing. Maybe the fact that myself and young James headed off together suggests we are in fact working together.
Or perhaps, dear Wowbagger, the fact that you are spearheading a vote for me, and I for you, perhaps this means we are Assassins, and we are baiting and switching again.
Hmm... Curiouser and curiouser!

Wowbagger tIP |

still voting for you, but only on the word of Alessandra. I have to vote for one of you after the suspicious double vote at the end. She may be an aristocrat as she claims.
Sir James not voting last round makes him appear innocent. An assassin would have broken the tie and ended the game last round by getting rid of an aristocrat by voting and another one by assassination.
Dr. Lugwaude would have changed her vote to Alessandra at the end had she been an assassin with you. So if I believe you are guilty, I have to believe Dr. Lugwaude is innocent.
Hence, like Vizzini in princess bride, I drink this one.

Dr. Lugwaude Lächelnschiefe |

So what the vote count is currently:
Wowbagger: 3 (Red Robert, Sir James, Prof. Alessandra)
Red Robert: 1 (Wowbagger)
Correct?
Interesting; I was half expecting this last round to turn out to be Dr. L vs. Prof. A part two electric boogaloo.
Much like Wowbagger I'm on board with the Alessandra/Red Robert theory, but I'm almost certain he's innocent in any case as he could have simply dropped his vote for me and won the game if he was guilty.
If somehow things become absurdly loony and we pull the game goes on for another cycle I'd recommend the SF protect themselves if possible.
Question: Can the SF protect (his/her)self?