All of the kneecaps. Gone.
Yeah....that's why I make my own strawberry waffles.
So this it the T2, friendly Cyna?
I don't follow.
Me either
Something about Skynet, I think?
Oh.....okay.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
"I'll be back."
So you want to play a monk?
I love that take-down.
At level 7 I get Ki Throw which is basically that.
Nice!
Your purpose in life is going to be to torment me.....isn't it? *sigh*
No. My purpose in life is to impose the rule of Asmodeus unto these lands.
Messing with you is just an added bonus.
*Sticks tongue out at you* jerk
Side note: I'm so sick of waking up in the middle of the night and not being able to go back to sleep. If that good for nothing hieffer shows up today I'm gonna have to try really hard not to just beat the holy hell outta her.
Isn't trading one fanatic for another just kind of stupid?
Try to see if you can fall back asleep.
What serves Asmodeus serves us all.
Oh whatever you pirate puppet.
I've been trying since 2:30....I'm almost ready to give up and get up and have a bowl of freakin cereal.
That sucks.
What serves Asmodeus serves us all.
Okay somebody's drinking the kool aid way full on.
I woke up sweaty and hot and just haven't been able to go back to sleep. Part of it is that it's been a really stressful week and the other part is I'm waiting to hear from these people at the women's clinic to find out about my biopsy results. Which hurt like fu©k¡μ& hell by the way.
I'm just doing what I have to do for Ass face assmodeus so I can get the hell on with my life. I don't care about his stupid agenda.
Rav isn't the only one who can spot loop holes you know, try not to make it so easy for me will you?
Yes and no. On one hand I praise Asmodues on the other I don't directly answer any question directed at me.
I don't pay attention to wording. I just want my freedom. I don't care about anything else. I'll do whatever I have to to get it and that's it.
Nobody's getting owned, I guarantee you that.
I had to get up to go to the bathroom.....I don't even know if there's any point in laying back down since I have to be up at 5:30 anyways.
At least lie down even if you don't fall asleep.
hmph
I just had a random thought.
I was looking over my old Piper documents for the start of the Cadrinites Adventure, and I got to thinking. If I were to try and make this into a one shot module for young adventurers, would it be to crazy to allow the PC's to forgo a feat in exchange for a single class feature (restricted) of a PC Class? For example, an Expert could use a feat slot to get Sneak Attack, but only at 1d6. Or another example, an Adept could use a feat to gain access to a single spell from one of the caster classes of either first level or lower (i.e. Magic Missile).
Does that seemed balanced?
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Not really. Dumping a feat for one class feature is really a disadvantage. Class features build off each other to be effective and one spell isn't always going to come in handy. The better thing to do is create encounters that can be handled without class features.
You see, this is why I asked. I hadn't considered how much class features build off of each other.
The 3.5 UA had a system like that. It's what I used when my friend and I were designing our fallout E6 rules.
Oh yeah, I remember that. Matter of fact I have that book somewhere.
Yeah and in Pathfinder especially the structure of how classes build upon themselves is a big part of the design. You've seen first hand how much multi-classing can gimp a character.
Features that don't mesh end up being essentially weaker than the sum of it's parts on paper.
Quite true. I mean the main reason I considered the thought in the first place, was because of what I did in the actual game. Allowing some uses of certain features with some restrictions. Another reason was primarily for the Adept. That class makes sense if you're planning on retraining as a Cleric or a Witch, but not a lot of other casters.
Although, maybe it could be modified like the Spellcaster in the Generic Class system? Upon creation you select divine or arcane and that dictates what spells you can cast? Would that make sense or even work?
For what you're thinking of using it for I think it would be easier to remove features/skills/spells from the original class. Thus you wouldn't need a total rebuild after the 'tutorial' just a few add-on's.
Right. Water down the existing class but it's still clear what "career path" it derives from. Acolyte, budding Sorceror, not quite at level 1 power but clearly headed in that direction.
Like the not quite Cleric gets a single domain, and the domain spell but no domain power and maybe only channels d4's
More Options.
Weakened Familiar (No Alerness or other buffs)
Weakened Sneak Attack (d4's)
Weakened Animal Companion (Lower CR or small size only)
Fewer spells per/day
Fewer Rage/Bardic Rounds per/day
Only Proficient in simple weapons/light armor for Martial types
Hmm, now that's an interesting thought of how to do young adventurers altogether. We may have to delve more into that later.
Surprised she didn't want one as a midnight snack.
Would the eastern monk weapons in the Ult. Equipment be available for this list?
Nah....I have other.....appetites that need satisfying right now. Besides....I've eaten plenty in the last day or so. My tummy is still full from the two cooks.
As long as it's within budget, I don't see why not.
EDIT: Besides, what kind of villain would you be without something memorable that no one else has?
I need something shiny and sharp.
Why? Your claws seem to be doing enough. And there are feats you can take to improve them further.
I know....but what if I wanna chop them up into little pieces? It's purely for my own enjoyment.
Just something to amuse me. When ya get my list, just humor me.
Or what, you'll eat somebody? Wait, that's still a bad thing here right?