IMO, it's not OP at all.
Here are my reasons why.
First, in combat. It's one more save. That's all. It's beneficial, yes, as it does not worsen the poison on a Failure, but it still would on a Critical Failure, and the 30' cone would heal all creatures, not just allies, inside it. Given the cooldown until it can be used on a given person again, you could easily hit people who don't need the healing to help an ally with Poison damage, and put them on cooldown for the healing as well.
Outside of combat, the cooldown makes it very not OP. Why? Because most poisons last 6 rounds. Now, not all do, and on the ones that last a long time, it is very helpful. But most do, and so all it grants is one bonus save.
With diseases, yes, it could hit OP levels, in theory, and I do agree with your proposed house rule of a total of one use of Torrent in the Blood per affliction.
Another couple of things to consider before thinking it's OP. First, it only affects one poison or disease, so if the ally has two or more on them, it only hits one, and then the ally is on cooldown. Second, many enemies that can apply poison can just reapply poison. This makes the timing of when to use Torrent crucial, and giving PCs decision points is, IMO, a good thing
| 5 people marked this as a favorite. |
The "point" of a Kineticist is essentially spending a whole class feat to get something like a spell as essentially a cantrip. If you go nerfing those at-will abilities so that they don't overshadow casting in the few cases where being able to do something at-will actually matters, it's a real bummer.
The ability does essentially guarantee removing a disease before it can progress, so if you need to nerf it, I would consider making its ability to treat a disease once per eight hours (matching the frequency of the Treat Disease activity, but taking a few actions instead of requiring working for eight hours straight). The ten-minute limit is longer than most poisons run, so it's just not relevant there.
The "point" of a Kineticist is essentially spending a whole class feat to get something like a spell as essentially a cantrip. If you go nerfing those at-will abilities so that they don't overshadow casting in the few cases where being able to do something at-will actually matters, it's a real bummer.
The ability does essentially guarantee removing a disease before it can progress, so if you need to nerf it, I would consider making its ability to treat a disease once per eight hours (matching the frequency of the Treat Disease activity, but taking a few actions instead of requiring working for eight hours straight). The ten-minute limit is longer than most poisons run, so it's just not relevant there.
Well, if kineticist was only one or primary healer I probably would not be bothered about it's ability to remove deseases with such ease, which overshadow spells. But the main reasoning here is that party has a main healer, and she has spells and invested in medicine. Granted that bard unlike witch or cleric could not swap spells in their repertoir each day, whats the point to have such spells if kineticist can do all the same but better?
Making it once per 8 hours is a good advice, I will consider that approach
I would certainly let the Bard choose to retrain Cleanse Affliction if they don't think they're getting good value out of it anymore, and I'd handwave the usual training costs and time. (Spontaneous casters can freely retrain a spell on level-up anyway, and often forget the option.)
It's worth noting that Torrent in the Blood won't remove the lingering effects of a disease or poison, so if the Bard needs a substitute spell, Restoration, Clear Mind, and Sound Body are all good choices.
However, Cleanse Affliction can guarantee improving the condition of a poison or disease right away, while heightened versions also get a counteract check to remove it entirely. Even if you don't change Torrent in the Blood, Cleanse Affliction is still pulling its weight against poison.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I would say that you are absolutely not wrong to nerf only allow a rerolled save once per affliction, As Paizo themselves errated a similar ability to do just that.
Page 47: Update the One Moment till Glory transcendence of victor’s wreath to more closely match some similar abilities, to have less of a downside in certain situations, and to be less powerful at ending long-term effects outside combat.
“You rally your allies, carrying them from the brink of disaster to the verge of victory. Each ally in your aura can immediately attempt a new saving throw with a +2 status bonus against one ongoing negative effect or condition currently affecting it that required a save. Use the result of the new save to determine the outcome of the effect, unless the new save would have a worse result than the original save, in which case nothing happens. Each ally can gain this benefit against a given effect only once.”
That's an ability with no cooldown, no restrictions on what it can be used on (including things like permanent curses or urgent things like the Dominate spell), that gives a bonus on the save, and that is level 1 instead of 6. I wouldn't really consider it that similar of an ability myself.
Or, put another way, if it's limited to once-per-effect, it would be appropriate for it to affect anything, not just poisons and diseases.
I would say that you are absolutely not wrong to nerf only it into allow a rerolled save once per affliction, As Paizo themselves errated a similar ability to do just that.
Page 47: Update the One Moment till Glory transcendence of victor’s wreath to more closely match some similar abilities, to have less of a downside in certain situations, and to be less powerful at ending long-term effects outside combat.
“You rally your allies, carrying them from the brink of disaster to the verge of victory. Each ally in your aura can immediately attempt a new saving throw with a +2 status bonus against one ongoing negative effect or condition currently affecting it that required a save. Use the result of the new save to determine the outcome of the effect, unless the new save would have a worse result than the original save, in which case nothing happens. Each ally can gain this benefit against a given effect only once.”
This is exactly how I would nerf it. The idea that you should just have "unlimited cleanse affliction until it succeeds" is ridiculous. Against slow acting poisons and most diseases its a hard counter. Even someone actually specialized in this with the relevant Medicine feats can't do anything like this, and casters would have to burn a ton of high rank spell slots.
It can activate once per stage of the affliction would also be better.