| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I'm like, 99% sure that it's only because refocusing feats dont need playtesting and thus didn't make it into the book, but please give the exemplar the "get all your points back on a refocus" feat in the final book!
When I was making my playtest exemplar; I found that the focus spells were actually really valuable! Protector's Sacrifice is really nice alongside Scar of the Survivor; and Scholarly Recollection plus Improved Improvisation offers up some Recall Knowledge ability around the level of an Enigma muse, sans the know it all/true hypercognition stuff. I can see myself wanting to run an exemplar that leans pretty heavy into their focus points, so recharge support would be great
Are you using the remaster focus rules that allows to stay refocusing until full? If not you should these classes projected to be played using the remaster rules.
Also the lack of a refocus speepup feat in both classes makes me think that maybe the designers moved it to general feat list or to a shared class feat to save book space.
Are you using the remaster focus rules that allows to stay refocusing until full? If not you should these classes projected to be played using the remaster rules.
Also the lack of a refocus speepup feat in both classes makes me think that maybe the designers moved it to general feat list or to a shared class feat to save book space.
I am; but my level 4 archer exemplar uses Survey Wildlife -> Recall Knowledge as a main out of combat exploration thing (I'm packing Improved Improvisation so I can always hit a specific lore), and use Scholarly Recollection for it. Since the blinding shot wasn't appealling, the 4th level feat I picked was Protector's Sacrifice, to let myself be a pseudo paladin, but it burns through focus points, so having a fast refocus would be nice
I know it takes 30 min, but that's like 3 exploration turns of not doing things when it could be 1 turn.
It's not like I'm saying it's essential; but both the monk and the champion get the refocus feats so I don't see why the exemplar getting it is so objectionable