
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I did some searching and could not find any post about this so far so if there is please point me in the right direction. I have ran and reported 13 games to include 4 quests and 9 scenarios. When I check my "Records" the games show up on my characters but there is no GM credit count that I can find. I would have assumed that it would be next to the 1E GM table credit count bu it is not. If it is somewhere else, please let me know. If it doesn't exist, please let me know when it will be updated to exist. My personal goal is to reach 30 table credits before GenCon 2020 so I can provide my tables I play at with 2 hero points (1 for each of the 2 lowest level players).
Thanks

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

Thanks for volunteering to GM.
For 2E, we don’t know how many tables of credit the quests or modules might or might not be toward your new “Glyphs,” there is no overall 2E table count being displayed anywhere in your My Organized Play section, and no Glyphs being shown in posts. Currently, we have not been told a timeline for any of these things to happen.
At least in my area, we are working on the Trust system. If you run a table and say you’ve earned a Glyph by GMing 10 tables, we simply believe you.

![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for volunteering to GM.
For 2E, we don’t know how many tables of credit the quests or modules might or might not be toward your new “Glyphs,” there is no overall 2E table count being displayed anywhere in your My Organized Play section, and no Glyphs being shown in posts. Currently, we have not been told a timeline for any of these things to happen.
At least in my area, we are working on the Trust system. If you run a table and say you’ve earned a Glyph by GMing 10 tables, we simply believe you.
Thanks. I was hoping for something official but I'm still optimistic that it will come by Gencon so I don't have to rely on the GM honoring the honor system. Although as far as I know, it only gives you hero points to distribute so I don't see why anyone wouldn't trust you.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

I'm still optimistic that it will come by Gencon
Heh. One would hope that Paizo can get it done before August 2020…
We do the honor system in our area too. Everyone knows who GMs a lot, and who doesn't.
I certainly hope quests count towards glyphs/ACP — otherwise, I will no longer be scheduling them.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

jakjr15 wrote:I'm still optimistic that it will come by GenconHeh. One would hope that Paizo can get it done before August 2020…
We do the honor system in our area too. Everyone knows who GMs a lot, and who doesn't.
I certainly hope quests count towards glyphs/ACP — otherwise, I will no longer be scheduling them.
I don't mind counting quests toward Glyphs, but I object to 1 quest equaling 1 scenario in that regard. I think it should be 3 quests to equal one scenario.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

I think I remember Bob over the summer wondering if there would be a way to re-use ACP points/scoring and re-scale the table requirements.
Ie we already have official ACP scaling for quest versus scenarios -- and it is 1:4. I'm not sure we have ACP values for modules yet.
If we didn't have the notion of standard/premier/premier plus, it would definitely seem like a simplification to change table counts to GM-ACP by multiplying by 8. However with those extra bonus tiers, I think it complicates things. Personally I'd think its better to not count the bonus amounts towards glpyhs, at which point maintaining separate code to do the counting/scaling (even if you can use the same scaling) is probably less error prone.
There's also the UI side of things for Lifetime ACP versus current ACP, since ACP is a spendable resource.
I remember it being an intriguing idea over the summer, but I think I've just talked myself out of preferring it.