|
While I wouldn't mind trying to track down all the other players who were at the table, I can see the GM not being willing to do the extra work and ruling that it must be done before the session is over, otherwise it only benefits the PC using the boon. It does say 'the' scenario rather than 'a' scenario.
Venture-Lieutenant, Finland—Turku
|
You'd need to do it at the end of that specific scenario (bonekeep) in this case.Where is that detailed? The wording is open ended in my mind.
... Because it wouldn't make any sense otherwise and/or would be very difficult to pull off? I can't imagine a situation where, after playing for scenario A, you tell everybody at the table that they suddenly succeeded at the secondary condition of a scenario X that nobody else of them played (but which you did play 6 months ago). How would you report that? They could also go over the normal maximum limit of 2PP/fame per 1xp earned. Alternatively, you'd also need to track down the GM and ask them to change the reporting to reflect the additional PP. A PC might have died, and could be that 1 prestige away from actually getting a raise dead - now they have 1 PP more, can they now raise themselves despite having been reported dead?
Trying to apply it to old scenarios raises so many questions that the text should be a lot more specific if that was intention. Trying to track down potentially 7 complete strangers being one of the biggest ones. (not to mention that text would need to specify if it means the players NOW at your table or players who WERE at your table back then)
