| Nekomimi^w^ |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
"An undead creature with the ability to enter a rage gains the morale bonuses from rage despite being immune to morale effects. The bonus to Constitution from the rage applies to an undead creature’s Charisma instead."
This is quote from "Undead Barbarian" special ability. Question is if its just ruling listed as ability (as in to remind how things work) or despite its wording it only applies to creature with that ability?
| Zolanoteph |
My group ruled that since it's only found on that one creature, it only applies to that creature. Not an official ruling, of course, but that was our conclusion. You can still have undead barbarians, though, since the Unchained Barbarian gets mostly untyped bonuses.
True about unchained barbarian, but that's kind of a weird unchained class if you ask me. I had a conversation about it that went like this:
Me: I wanna make an unchained barbarian. The untyped bonus to damage makes them better for Dex/TWF builds.
DM: dex builds. So you get SO ANGRY that you become more graceful? How does that make sense?
Me: Um... That's a good point. But with the way rage bonuses work now the math has been streamlined and simplified.
DM: if you can't figure out how to up your damage, to hit math and HP in rage you shouldn't be playing D&D.
EDIT:
I also don't get why Paizo "fixed" the "problem" of sudden barbarian death syndrome, probably the most heroic and manly aspect of any class.
| blahpers |
"An undead creature with the ability to enter a rage gains the morale bonuses from rage despite being immune to morale effects. The bonus to Constitution from the rage applies to an undead creature’s Charisma instead."
This is quote from "Undead Barbarian" special ability. Question is if its just ruling listed as ability (as in to remind how things work) or despite its wording it only applies to creature with that ability?
Where is this special ability published?
Edit: Nevermind, found it--Monster Codex, Vampire Savage. It's only for that creature, despite the poor wording attempting to sneak in a global rules change.
thaX
|
There is a blurb elsewhere that replaces Con references with Cha for Undead when under beneficial effects, though Rage was not the example. It may be in the Bestiary, but I could be wrong.
The rage blurb in the other book is just clarifying the use of the power.