| Legonian |
Hi guys. I´m new to Starfinder (great game) and got some questions about powered armor and weapons:
If I remember correctly, every powered armor is described as humanoid in shape and all but the battle harness are bigger then medium. So, can I use my powered armor "hands" to wield standard weapons, or do I have to pay for larger versions? I´m inclined to go option 2, but I saw arguments for both sides, including people saying that you can use your arms normally while in powered armor (making it more like Edge of Tomorrow and less Iron Man/Mecha).
For me the main source of doubt is the spider harness. they mention the armor have actuator connected to your arms. If it means you can freely use your arms, then it answers the previous question but they should have made it explicit. If it just means that the armor have arms that you can control, then it´s just the same as the others and there was no need to make that distinction.
Thanks.
| Vexies |
My understanding is that any power armor with hands can wield equipment / weapons however if its larger than medium then it would take size penalties unless the gear was sized for the armor.
Pg 168 of the core book states:
"Weapons are built to be easily held and used by both Small and Medium creatures. Weapons can be built for use by smaller creatures but generally cost twice as much (since they require special miniaturization technology). Weapons can also be built for use by larger creatures with no increase in price. A Small or Medium creature trying to use a weapon built for a creature that is Tiny or Large suffers a –4 penalty to attack rolls. Weapons designed for creatures Diminutive or smaller, or Huge or larger, generally cannot be effectively used by Small or Medium creatures."
Hope this helps
| Legonian |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
My understanding is that any power armor with hands can wield equipment / weapons however if its larger than medium then it would take size penalties unless the gear was sized for the armor.
Pg 168 of the core book states:
"Weapons are built to be easily held and used by both Small and Medium creatures. Weapons can be built for use by smaller creatures but generally cost twice as much (since they require special miniaturization technology). Weapons can also be built for use by larger creatures with no increase in price. A Small or Medium creature trying to use a weapon built for a creature that is Tiny or Large suffers a –4 penalty to attack rolls. Weapons designed for creatures Diminutive or smaller, or Huge or larger, generally cannot be effectively used by Small or Medium creatures."
Hope this helps
It does TY.
Any clarification about the spider harness? Like now the way Im conciliating the rules and the description is picturing a drider shaped mech.
| Vexies |
It shouldn't matter, the armor isn't a character. Also, I don't know if you can even assign an attack penalty to a suit of armor, or why that would then transfer to a character.
I believe your misunderstanding my explanation. I dont believe the OP was referring to weapons mounted on the armor they are of course built to an appropriate size. he is referring to taking his PC's weapons and holding them in the armors hands and using them. In this case its fairly clear by the rules what happens. Most armor is large or larger while a PC's weapons would be medium in most cases and so a -4 penalty would apply.
| Pantshandshake |
Nope, I get your explanation just fine. I didn't speak to armor size vs size of mounted weapons.
What I’m saying is that there are rules governing character size, weapon size, and the interactions between them. There are not, that I know of, rules governing whether your armor size and weapon size need to be compatible.
Until there are, a medium character wielding a medium weapon should be fine, regardless of how big his suit is.
I mean, I get what you're saying. It's even an understandable stance to have. But I don't believe the rules support your interpretation.
| Vexies |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Nope, I get your explanation just fine. I didn't speak to armor size vs size of mounted weapons.
What I’m saying is that there are rules governing character size, weapon size, and the interactions between them. There are not, that I know of, rules governing whether your armor size and weapon size need to be compatible.
Until there are, a medium character wielding a medium weapon should be fine, regardless of how big his suit is.
I mean, I get what you're saying. It's even an understandable stance to have. But I don't believe the rules support your interpretation.
I guess your game is your game but that interpretation makes no sense. if your encased in a Large suit of armor than for all intents and purposes you are considered large. Your reach is large, your space is large.. how then are you not considered large for things held in your large hands?
Zoggy Grav
|
Pantshandshake wrote:I guess your game is your game but that interpretation makes no sense. if your encased in a Large suit of armor than for all intents and purposes you are considered large. Your reach is large, your space is large.. how then are you not considered large for things held in your large hands?Nope, I get your explanation just fine. I didn't speak to armor size vs size of mounted weapons.
What I’m saying is that there are rules governing character size, weapon size, and the interactions between them. There are not, that I know of, rules governing whether your armor size and weapon size need to be compatible.
Until there are, a medium character wielding a medium weapon should be fine, regardless of how big his suit is.
I mean, I get what you're saying. It's even an understandable stance to have. But I don't believe the rules support your interpretation.
The hands might not be Large. *shrug* I don't see any reason why power armor's limbs must have variable weapon manipulators (i.e. hands) that are large, even if the total rig is Large. My car can shine normal headlights or brights at a flip of a switch, and the driver's seat can accommodate a big person like me or a very small person with some easy adjustments.
The large armor is not a large creature. It is, for all intents and purposes, a vehicle like my car. My car gives me certain extra characteristics when I drive it (speed, armor, temperature control); I don't BECOME the car.
| Pantshandshake |
That's basically my take, Zoggy.
But even without that, here's the thing: There's a rule about characters and weapons and compatible sizes. There's no rule about characters driving a larger-than-themselves thing and weapon sizes compatible with that.
On top of that, if you're a medium sized race in a large or huge power armor, *you* aren't even wielding the weapons, you're in a cockpit. That takes us even farther from the only rule we actually have.
So, to sum up:
You may be correct in your interpretation. It might be that paizo included armor bigger than characters and forgot to make a rule about weapon sizes for them. But for whatever reason, there isn't a rule, FAQ, or errata for inappropriate weapons based on the size of your armor
So if you want to do that, I won't even say you're wrong. It's possible, maybe even likely, that there should be some kind of penalty. But since the rules are silent about it, any rule anyone makes up to address it is house rule territory, and there's a whole other forum for that discussion.