All consuming Cleave or Cleaving smash(Two handed tricks)


Pathfinder First Edition General Discussion

Silver Crusade

Different Ideas but both have the same concept, allowing you to add whatever your vital strike damage would be to your cleave attempts

Except consuming cleave damages you in return but you can get it sooner while cleaving smash doesn't but you don't get it until level 13 unless you're a fighter. So between these 2 which is the better option?


I assume you mean all consuming swing . Here is the link for cleaving smash. I would say cleaving smash is better because you can apply the damage to the first two targets not just the initial target. All consuming swing let's you deal more damage but I don't think it's worth the self damage and single target.

Silver Crusade

CactusUnicorn wrote:
I assume you mean all consuming swing . Here is the link for cleaving smash. I would say cleaving smash is better because you can apply the damage to the first two targets not just the initial target. All consuming swing let's you deal more damage but I don't think it's worth the self damage and single target.

Yeah figured it would be something like that.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / General Discussion / All consuming Cleave or Cleaving smash(Two handed tricks) All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in General Discussion