
Jimbles the Mediocre |

mike roper wrote:
How is it a good way to get away from a reach weapon? It leaves you 5 feet away from said weapon no?
5 feet outside its threat range, yes. The ranged attacker will need to spend a move action to close with you again and cannot full attack. Especially useful if the attacker has another (hopefully tankier) target it can full attack. Very situational, but not useless.

![]() |

Jimbles the Mediocre wrote:
5 feet outside its threat range, yes. The ranged attacker will need to spend a move action to close with you again and cannot full attack. Especially useful if the attacker has another (hopefully tankier) target it can full attack. Very situational, but not useless.
I think you mean "melee" attacker, right?

Jimbles the Mediocre |

Gary Bush wrote:
Jimbles the Mediocre wrote:5 feet outside its threat range, yes. The ranged attacker will need to spend a move action to close with you again and cannot full attack. Especially useful if the attacker has another (hopefully tankier) target it can full attack. Very situational, but not useless.I think you mean "melee" attacker, right?
Gah. I meant the attacker with a reach weapon.

![]() |

Jimbles the Mediocre wrote:
mike roper wrote:How is it a good way to get away from a reach weapon? It leaves you 5 feet away from said weapon no?5 feet outside its threat range, yes. The ranged attacker will need to spend a move action to close with you again and cannot full attack. Especially useful if the attacker has another (hopefully tankier) target it can full attack. Very situational, but not useless.
don't think I said useless and well yes they can't full attack (unless they have right feats) that is still not a "good" way per say